Over at Real Clear Politics, Thomas Sowell has some thought on the “conservatives for Obama” phenomenon. It’s partly sour grapes–John McCain is not the dream candidate, ergo some conservatives are planning–or say they are planning–to vote for someone who is closer to a conservative nightmare. And it’s partly wishful thinking. Conservatives point out that Obama has been moving toward the center in his recent speeches, but it is (at best) a fantasy to believe that what a man says is more important than what he does, and Obama has done plenty to belie his recent centrist noises. As usual, Sowell gets to the heart of the matter: “What is becoming ever more painfully apparent,” he writes,
is that too many people this year– whether conservative, liberals or whatever– are all too willing to judge Barack Obama on the basis of his election-year rhetoric, rather than on the record of what he has advocated and done during the past two decades.
Many are for him for no more serious reasons than his mouth and his complexion. The man has become a Rorschach test for the feelings and hopes, not only of those on the left, but also for some on the right as well.
Here is a man who has consistently aided and abetted people who have openly expressed their contempt for this country, both in words and in such deeds as planting bombs to advance their left-wing agenda.
Despite the spin that judging Obama by what was said or done by such people would be “guilt by association,” he has not just associated with such people. He has in some cases donated some serious money of his own and even more of the taxpayers’ money, as both a state senator in Illinois and a member of the Senate of the United States.
Read the whole thing here.



Digg This
del.icio.us

PJM Home
The New Criterion
The Rape of the Masters: How Political Correctness Sabotages Art
Lives of the Mind: The Use and Abuse of Intelligence from Hegel to Wodehouse
Art’s Prospect: The Challenge of Tradition in an Age of Celebrity
Experiments Against Reality: The Fate of Culture in the Postmodern Age
Tenured Radicals, Revised: How Politics has Corrupted our Higher Education
Counterpoints: 25 Years of The New Criterion on Culture and the Arts
The Long March: How the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s Changed America
Against the Idols of the Age
Lengthened Shadows: America and Its Institutions in the Twenty-First Century
The Survival of Culture: Permanent Values in a Virtual Age
Physics and Politics, by Walter Bagehot, edited with an
Introduction by Roger Kimball

3 Comments
David Thomson:I suspect that many conservatives have been culturally programmed into perceiving a polite and friendly man of color as merely another Bill Cosby or Sidney Poitier. Ultimately, how could such an apparently warm fellow be perceived to be a threat? These “conservatives for Obama” also subconsciously wish to prove that they are not racists. Voting for him is supposedly evidence of their enlightened and non-bigoted attitudes. To be blunt, these normally right wing representatives are dangerously fooling themselves. Obama is, after all, psychologically and existentially a man of the left. At the end of the day, he will lurch leftward. Obama has not done the required reading and overall studying to evolve. He is very shallow. Nikita Khrushchev boxed the ears of the immature and ill prepared John F. Kennedy—and JFK had it far more together than Obama! Our nation’s enemies will take full advantage of the situation.
Jul 8, 2008 - 4:14 pm Daniel:Oddly enough, David, trying to prove that you’re not a racist by voting for and electing Obama puts a man in the White House who built his career by associating with and depending on the support of racists.
Jul 9, 2008 - 8:03 am