Roger’s Rules

Email This to a Friend

* Your name:

* Your email address:

* Your friend's name:

* Your friend's email address:

Message:

* Required Fields

August 3rd, 2008 8:56 am

Stanley Kurtz on Obama’s “lost years”

Reviewing the forty-plus columns that Barack Obama wrote for the Hyde Park Herald and the Chicago Defender between 1995, when he entered politics, and 2004, when he ran for the U.S. Senate, Stanley Kurtz provides a revealing and disturbing glimpse into the formative opinions and associations of the presumptive Democratic candidate for President.

Reportage in these two papers is particularly significant because Obama’s early political career–the time between his first campaign for the Illinois State Senate in 1995 and his race for U.S. Senate in 2004–can fairly be called the “lost years,” the period Obama seems least eager to talk about, in contrast to his formative years in Hawaii, California, and New York or his days as a community organizer, both of which are recounted in his memoir, Dreams from My Father. The pages of the Hyde Park Herald and the Chicago Defender thus offer entrée into Obama’s heretofore hidden world.

What they portray is a Barack Obama sharply at variance with the image of the post-racial, post-ideological, bipartisan, culture-war-shunning politician familiar from current media coverage and purveyed by the Obama campaign. As details of Obama’s early political career emerge into the light, his associations with such radical figures as Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Father Michael Pfleger, Reverend James Meeks, Bill Ayers, and Bernardine Dohrn look less like peculiar instances of personal misjudgment and more like intentional political partnerships. At his core, in other words, the politician chronicled here is profoundly race-conscious, exceedingly liberal, free-spending even in the face of looming state budget deficits, and partisan. Elected president, this man would presumably shift the country sharply to the left on all the key issues of the day-culture-war issues included. It’s no wonder Obama has passed over his Springfield years in relative silence.

Read the whole eye-opening column in The Weekly Standard here.

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

6 Comments

1. Elroy Jetson:

There is your real Barack Obama. This is a good article. It makes you want to read some of these articles he published in the Chicago Defender and the Hyde Park Herald. No man can get to where his is without a paper trail. His is just a little harder to find.

Aug 3, 2008 - 10:01 am 2. srlucado:

“What they portray is a Barack Obama sharply at variance with the image of the post-racial, post-ideological, bipartisan, culture-war-shunning politician familiar from current media coverage and purveyed by the Obama campaign.”

There’s the key passage right there. The media portrays Obama the way they want to see him, not as he actually is.

Why aren’t there more calls for him to face McMcain one-on-one? Why isn’t there more media reporting on Obama’s incredible misstatements on a wide range of topics? (Many of these are catalogued on Power Line.) Why don’t interviewers challenge him on his current statements that are completely at odds with his long-held positions in the past?

Obama is nothing but megalomania – nothing.

Scott

Aug 3, 2008 - 11:58 am 3. Martya:

Chicago City Alderman Arenda Troutman is guilty of bribery (see: “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arenda_Troutman).
She was finance director for John Edwards campaign and represented a district in South Chicago. Does Mr. Kurtz’ research suggest any connections between Troutman and Obama?

Aug 9, 2008 - 1:09 pm 4. Roger’s Rules » NY Times tries to torpedo anti-Obama book; succeeds in spreading its message:

[...] I wonder? Stanley Kurtz, as I mentioned a few days ago, has been doing yeoman’s service piecing together a picture of what Obama said, wrote, and in did in his early years as a political activist in Chicago. Thanks [...]

Aug 13, 2008 - 5:05 am 5. Dave ll:

Obama may be “least eager” to talk about these years…but even the years he HAS talked or written about are filled with unknowns, misstatements, diversion tactics, and rationalizations.

So the written word, back BEFORE he was a “professional politician” is the closest thing we get to seeing the heart and soul of the guy…

and it ain’t a pretty picture!

Aug 13, 2008 - 7:25 pm 6. Sitka Laker:

Total BS. Kurtz wouldn’t know the truth if it came up and bit him in the rear end.

Aug 27, 2008 - 6:51 pm

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: