Comments on: ” . . . a pro-Obama advocacy organization that every day attacks the McCain campaign”

By: Jack Klompus

Jack Klompus — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 00:37:56 +0000

9 o’ D — exactly. Sniveling little non-entities like KD flutter on in this belief that packaging themselves in this persona of biting wit and sarcastic disdain merits them some lofty place in the pantheon of commentary. But they are so transparent, so one-dimensional, so obvious and predictable in their trite, boring, self-aggrandizing routines. KD obviously thinks he’s a paragon of wit, “Oooh I’ll stick it to these Neanderthal ‘right-wingers’ with my devastating social commentary routine!” Then when you don’t give them the attention akin to when a toddler throws a tantrum they lash out. It’s kind of fun to roll their eyes at them like a stern teacher not giving in to the class clown.
KD – coward? Bring it any time anywhere you spineless little unfunny loser. First of all, you couldn’t carry Roger’s jock when it comes to intellect and accomplishment. You’re just a pathetic little tool getting your jollies on the internet because you possess a pedestrian intolerance of anything alien to your packaged, unquestioned secular views. You’ve been called out on your lame, tired, smug little act and now you’ve got your inch long member between your legs, you spineless little weenie. Leave your info anytime, you pretentious pseudo-intellectual j-off and I’ll show you cowardice.

By: Nine-of-Diamonds

Nine-of-Diamonds — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:55:59 +0000

@ Jack: I’ve noticed in the past few days how the Proggs’ anti-religious obsession against Palin is coming back to bite them. Notice that since her selection Obama has abandoned his campaign to reach out to disaffected cultural conservatives in the Red States. There was talk about winning Montana, South Dakota, etc – not anymore. For all their platitudes about winning over Christians from the EVIL RELIGIOUS RIGHT, Leftists never really could conceal their disdain for the believers. Palin’s nomination was the catalyst for the most over-the-top display of secularist bigotry in years. If Obama does win it will only be because of the secular progs and minority grievance groups that make up the usual Liberal base. A major opportunity for them to diversify their constituencies has been thrown away.

Obviously, the opposite is true – SP alienates some moderates because of her religion – but McCain probably needed to secure his base more than anything else.

By: KD

KD — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:11:02 +0000

On second thought, Jack, I owe you and everyone here an apology. I should have realized what first-rate minds I’m dealing with. Mature minds tempered by the humility that comes with great learning.

Yes, I’m ashamed of mocking the dignity of Sarah Plain’s church. Forgive me.

And please forgive me for my lame attempt to ridicule the even-handed approach to politics one finds on this blog. I bow before my betters and shall renounce my pen forever.

By: KD

KD — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:42:58 +0000

You’re a coward, Mr. Klompus. As I suspected.

By: Jack Klompus

Jack Klompus — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:06:28 +0000

I knew you’d come off your pedestal with enough poking of your bloated ego. Refute what? You assert nothing. Your entire shtick is this lame, sarcastic mocking of religious people, people right of center in their views, and anyone else you deem of lesser enlightened views than those which you smugly embrace. Your sanctimony and superior attitude oozes from every lamely crafted line you pen. You’re not funny. You’re not clever. You’re just an obnoxious, sarcastic, egotistical bore that thinks your smarter and more clever than anyone who dares dissent from your one-dimensional, holier than thou pseudo-progressive posture. But yet you fail to see that it is YOU that are the joke.

By: Nine-of-Diamonds

Nine-of-Diamonds — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:33:48 +0000

@ Jack – Quit being a bully. Our resident O-Drone “comedians” need encouragement. I seem to remember a real knee-slapper the other day about gang rape and black men. Of course, the Lightworkers’ little helpers promptly tried to justify it in their passive-aggressive way. Part of their “new kind of politics”, you see. HOPE AND CHANGE!

By: KD

KD — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:32:59 +0000

Very bright, Jack.

Why don’t you go back and refute one single thing I’ve said.

Let’s see how witty you are. Go ahead, give it a shot.

By: Jack Klompus

Jack Klompus — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:02:54 +0000

Just calling you out on your tired, played out routine for what it is – unfunny, self-indulgent tripe lacking even an iota of the wit that you are so convinced you possess.

By: gaetano catelli

gaetano catelli — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:47:52 +0000

mtraven: “The left is full of over-privileged children? May I remind you that the right-wing commentariat is full of undistinguished hacks who owe their positions solely to neopotism: Jonah Goldberg, John Podhoretz, William Kristol, and Adam Bellow (who had to write a whole book defending the practice). I won’t count Christopher Buckley, who is that rarity on the right, a conservative who manages to retain not only a smidgen of independent thought but even a functioning sense of humor.”

i didn’t write that the left has a monopoly on childish chatterers (of course, it doesn’t). what i did write was that it is ironic that the NYT’s portside bias has resulted in their providing a showcase only for those conservative voices who seem quite reasonable and mature, at the same time that it presents several voices on the left who sound like obnoxious spoiled children.

By: KD

KD — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:26:38 +0000

Poor Jack. Your vulgar, puerile remark smacks of desperation.