Multiculturalism is a cultural belief.

Multiculturalism excludes the alternative cultural belief of non-multiculturalism.

Hence, Multiculturalism is inadmissible in a multicultural society.

Consider Mumbai, or Rome and Vienna airports, or Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie Scotland. The slaughter of the non-muslim, the “white people” (there) accomplishes nothing toward (any such) struggle to uproot an unjust ruler in the dar as Salam, now does it?

Our war in Iraq and Afghanistan, and elsewhere, did precisely that. [jihad]

But if the ‘infidel’ wants to call the slaughter of the ‘infidel’ “white people” jihad, then ‘let the infidel go ahead and lie to himself’ (and satisfy his standards for newspeak, (whatever that is) simultaneously).

Isalm starts taqquia; if we continue to lie to ourselves, by calling it jihad, instead of Takfiri, then we have ourselves to blame, as well.

this interpretation reminds me of that old Charlton Heston movie, “Moses and the 10 Spitritual Opportunities”.

Produce a conservative dictionary:

Words in:
Acsesis, dimpse, miscegenation, phlogiston, phrenology, roinish, etc.

My calendar was made, published and printed in the USA (!) and it’s the same brand I’ve been using for at least a decade now. I haven’t kept past issues, but I bet even as little as 5 years ago, these Moslem dates were not shown.

Granted that 6 days out of 365 is not much, but of course, that’s not the point. And, chances are that within 5 years, even more Moslem holidays will make their debut. After all, the calendar still does not show such important dates as the beginning of the Hajj (currently on-going in Mecca) and the Birthday of the Prophet.

It’s also interesting to note that more than ½ of the “Western” holidays have nothing to do with religion: Veterans’ Day, Thanksgiving, Mother’s Day, Independence Day and so on, whereas all the Moslem dates are 100% religious (can you believe that in the Moslem world there is no such thing as Mother’s Day !?).

A dissertation could be written on the significance of what all this means, but one thing springs to mind right now: “Soft Jihad”, the mainstreaming of Islamic values and institutions into Western societies by legal means, is making inroads in places that are most unexpected…and what’s worse, that on the surface appear totally innocuous.

Oh, try this: one of the very few things that the Bush administration got right after 9/11 was to realize that not all Muslims are radical fundamentalist terrorists, and the best way to counteract the appeal of Islamic fundamentalists was to treat normal Muslims, especially American Muslims, like human beings (the Bush clan’s coziness with the House of Saud probably helped). Of course, then they invaded Iraq, Abu Ghraib happened, and whatever good will we had managed to accumulate was squandered. But soon we will have an Islamofascistcommieterroristfistbumper President, (Malcolm X’s love child no less) so we can try again

The alternative to this approach would be to declare war on the world’s billion Muslims and the intern the US’s 5 million or so Muslims. That sounds real practical.