Roger’s Rules

January 8th, 2009 6:16 am

Why Satire Suffers: a Example from the “Adult Entertainment” Industry

I have often had occasion to bemoan the sad lot of the satirist in contemporary society. Satire depends for its bite on a discrepancy between the satire and reality. The satirist presents an exaggerated, over-the-top caricature of some state of affairs in order to highlight a recognizable element of failure, hypocrisy, turpitude, or pomposity. It’s one thing for a critic to satirize some elements of modern art as pre-packaged excrement. But what’s the critic to do when faced with Piero Manzoni’s “Artist’s Shit,” a series of 90 numbered cans each containing 30 grams of the artist’s own feces? In May 2007, a single can fetched 124,000 euros at Sotheby’s. Can you beat that?

The financial bailout mania might just do it. Yesterday, Instapundit linked to a story about about a possible bailout for the porn industry. (Do not scoff at the word “industry”: at least those folks bestir themselves to do some real work.) Fox News had the lowdown:

With the financial industry, auto makers and more getting assistance from the federal government to stay afloat during the recession, the adult industry decided it would try to get something as well.

Girls Gone Wild CEO Joe Francis and “Hustler” magazine publisher Larry Flynt have said they will petition Congress for financial aid along the lines of what the Big Three auto makers are getting.

Francis said that he and Flynt are asking for $5 billion, and that they have sent letters to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Congress and their local Congressman, Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) with the proposal.

With the $5 billion, they would “invest in building new means of distribution, and shoring up our distribution right now to prevent further erosion from factors like Youporn and other Internet content that has seriously affected our business over the past few years,” Francis said in an interview with FOX Business. “We will use the money wisely, and we will create more jobs.”

Francis said that if invited, he and Flynt would drive across the country in a hybrid vehicle to present their plans to Congress.

The press release noted that DVD sales and rentals for the adult industry have decreased by 22% in the past year, partially because people are turning more and more to the Internet for adult content.

“People are too depressed to be sexually active,” Flynt said in the press release. “This is very unhealthy as a nation. Americans can do without cars and such but they cannot do without sex.”

Francis said he and Flynt would also be willing to discuss the possibility of the government buying equity stakes in their companies, as was done with financial firms.

“If the government would like to be a partner with Mr. Flynt and I, we’re certainly amenable to it,” he said.

Pretty funny, right? But how much more outrageous would a government bailout for Mr. Flynt be (and who knows: maybe he’ll get it!) than a government bailout for newspapers? Or a football game? Here in Connecticut, politicians are proposing the former while earlier this week, as George Will reports, football got its chance. Will noted

Tuesday’s Bailout Bowl (Ball State vs. Tulsa, by the way), in which you could have seen your tax dollars at work. Or at play.

The game’s real name was the GMAC Bowl. GMAC is known as the “financing affiliate” of General Motors. But Cerberus, the huge private equity firm that owns 80.1 percent of Chrysler, also owned 51 percent of GMAC until GMAC got the government to baptize it as a bank holding company. That transformation supposedly was necessary to make GMAC eligible for a place at the TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) trough — although GM itself already has a place there, as does Chrysler. Anyway, the infusion of TARP dollars — 6 billion of them — diluted Cerberus’ GMAC ownership to at most 33 percent, but that diminution seems a small price for Cerberus to pay for a second bite from the bailout apple.

An example of what Juvenal called panis et circenses–the bread and circuses with which a besieged Roman govenrment would entertain, and pacify, a disgruntled public? Maybe so. Or maybe Piero Manzoni had a more accurate name for the enterprise. In any event, it stinks.

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

16 Comments

1. Fausta’s Blog » Blog Archive » Girls Gone Wild With Bailouts:

[...] Related: Why Satire Suffers: a Example from the “Adult Entertainment” Industry [...]

Jan 8, 2009 - 7:50 am 2. Leave it to Larry Flynt to take the absurdity up a notch. « Perplexed with Narrow Passages:

[...] Roger Kimball responds humorlessly to the same news by claiming that the times are just too horrid for satire. His readers will [...]

Jan 8, 2009 - 8:29 am 3. Mrs. Jackson:

Oh Mr. Kimball, why not?

We’ve already got the horse-face Harry Reid running the Senate.

Jan 8, 2009 - 8:43 am 4. Gaffe Prices:

Well, you just don’t get it do you. Piero was protesting the idea of a government mandate of one sheet of toilet paper per, uh, can in this case. /sarcasm off

I’ll grant you though, its pretty shoddy satire. He would have had a stronger case if he’d have utilized some worthless Zimbabwean banknotes in his, uh, struggle against, uh, the government.

Speaking of sports, GM owns a golf course. So why not sell that otherwise non contributory asset? The answer is obvious, they don’t have to. they’ve moved to the “if it moves (at all) again, subsidize it” level of existence, and they know it.

Jan 8, 2009 - 9:32 am 5. Gaffe Prices:

P.S. I smell a new world odor in all of this.

Jan 8, 2009 - 10:10 am 6. John Allen:

In some respects Larry Flynt and Joe Francis are right. The porn industry has taken a hit over the last few years and perhaps the gov’t should step in. Failing that, hopefully it has given these two the exposure they were looking for when they brought this up, kind of funny really.
- J Allen
http://www.sexarise.com
http://www.sexarise.blogspot.com

Jan 8, 2009 - 3:03 pm 7. PA Cat:

The government is already a partner in the “adult” industry– just ask Barney Frank, John Edwards, Eliot Spitzer, and the other usual suspects.

Jan 8, 2009 - 4:36 pm 8. ahem:

Satire’s only possible when such a thing as shame exists. No shame, no satire.

Jan 8, 2009 - 6:02 pm 9. Josh:

>>Pretty funny, right? But how much more outrageous would a government bailout for Mr. Flynt be (and who knows: maybe he’ll get it!) than a government bailout for newspapers? Or a football game?<<

Oh, I don’t know, maybe the fact that those things are considered good, wholesome industries, at least when compared to the sex industry? Despite the fact that it generates a great deal of money anually, sex industries are still marginalized – they’re still “dirty” and “unwholesome.” So by using an industry that always creates such a rabid response in the public (a response which the annual figures of the sex industry put the lie to, but which occurs nevertheless) maybe people who wouldn’t otherwise will finally sit up and pay attention.

Of course it probably won’t happen, since most of the target audience will be too busy whipping themselves into a “moral fervor,” but the point still stands.

Jan 8, 2009 - 10:15 pm 10. Charlie (Colorado):

At least you got the joke. That’s more than you can say for a lot of people.

Jan 9, 2009 - 2:15 am 11. Newmarket2:

I have heard that Flynt, a known libertarian, said in an interview that the petition to congress was entirely a means to an end. He seems to have no interest in a federal bailout whatsoever and was doing this to highlight the entire concept of the federal government bailing out ANY industry.

Jan 9, 2009 - 7:21 am 12. Skeptic:

>>>>Despite the fact that it generates a great deal of money anually, sex industries are still marginalized – they’re still “dirty” and “unwholesome.”

Well, that’s because it is. Prostitution caught on film (well, video) is still prostitution. It is corrupting and demeaning to both those who do it and those who watch it. That’s the very definition of “unwholesome” and “dirty”.

Jan 9, 2009 - 10:05 am 13. BMoon:

I have often had occasion to bemoan the sad lot of the satirist in contemporary society.
Thank you, thank you, Mr. Kimball. You understand our pain, our suffering. Satirists are out of work in unheard of numbers. Satire venues are going belly up faster than the wannabe starlets in the Playboy Mansion…..

Hey, maybe we should ask for bailout money.

(My satire blog is at :http://lumpsfromtheleft.blogspot.com/)

Jan 9, 2009 - 10:15 pm 14. Steynian 306 « Free Canuckistan!:

[...] ROGER KIMBALL– “Why Satire Suffers: a Example from the “Adult Entertainment” Industry” [...]

Jan 10, 2009 - 4:22 pm 15. Steynian 306:

[...] ROGER KIMBALL– “Why Satire Suffers: a Example from the “Adult Entertainment” Industry” [...]

Jan 11, 2009 - 1:53 pm 16. Con-Artist Revealed:

No, I don’t think so, no bail out for porn. And I will use as my reasoning that excuse that has disenfranchised many a day laborer, “You, gentleman may not receive an industry bailout because you are not an industry. Your employees consist mainly of subcontractors.” :)

Jan 13, 2009 - 6:53 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: