Every phone call. Every email. Every text message. Every web site visited. I land at Heathrow and discover that Big Brother in England will be recording it all: the entire electronic career of every private citizen will salted away for a year in a gigantic database and “available for monitoring by government bodies.” Six-hundred and fifty-three government bodies, to be precise, including the police and local council authorities. They will not need a warrant from a judge but only the authorisation of a “senior” police officer or equivalent of a deputy head of department at a local authority to rifle through who you’ve talked to when about what. This is more or less the equivalent of a hall pass in your local high school. Adding insult to injury, the British taxpayers are going to be forced to fork over some £2 billion to spy on themselves. According to the London Daily Telegraph, the “Intercept Modernisation Programme,” as this hideous assault on freedom is officially denominated, will allow any public authority to see the internet addresses, dates, times, and recipients of calls made by every citizen in the kingdom. Only 29 percent of the British people are in favor of this preposterous scheme. But the Home Office insists that it will push it through anyway. In this post-democratic era, what does the will of the people mean when put up against the inclinations of political bureaucrats?
Britain, once the cradle of political liberty, is now leading the world in capitulating to the the soft-totalitarian forces that would gobble up freedom for the sake of central control. I have been quoting this observation of David Hume frequently of late: seldom is freedom lost all at once. Here in England we have another example of how it oozes away. Sad. Expensive. And frightening.





PJM Home

The New Criterion
The Rape of the Masters: How Political Correctness Sabotages Art
Lives of the Mind: The Use and Abuse of Intelligence from Hegel to Wodehouse
Art’s Prospect: The Challenge of Tradition in an Age of Celebrity
Experiments Against Reality: The Fate of Culture in the Postmodern Age
Tenured Radicals, NEW, EXPANDED EDITION FALL 2008! How Politics has Corrupted our Higher Education
Counterpoints: 25 Years of The New Criterion on Culture and the Arts
The Long March: How the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s Changed America
Against the Idols of the Age
Lengthened Shadows: America and Its Institutions in the Twenty-First Century
The Survival of Culture: Permanent Values in a Virtual Age
Physics and Politics, by Walter Bagehot, edited with an
Introduction by Roger Kimball
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
5 Comments
1. biblio44:Sounds like the logical next step in the warrantless-wiretap strategy. What’s the problem?
Nov 11, 2009 - 8:35 am 2. William M. Briggs:These remarks will be noted in your file.
If any readers have heard Mr Kimball utter negativities against England, I encourage them to report them immediately.
Don’t trust your neighbors.
Nov 11, 2009 - 9:04 am 3. SoberHorseThief:Unbelieveable. They can’t control crime in the streets but they can spend two billion pounds controling the lives of law-abiding citizens.
Nov 11, 2009 - 9:42 am 4. Scott:Sorry to say, but this is what you get when you allow things like the Patriot Act, and prolonging the campaign in Afghanistan; both from “different” political parties, but essentially the same thing: letting the government dictate things as opposed the what freely elected REPRESENTATIVES (not “leaders”) are supposed to do.
It’s not Democrat versus Republican any longer, the only difference between the parties has been reduced to semantics, I’m afraid. It’s now the people versus Big Brother (or Big Sister for those of the radical feminist agenda).
Nov 11, 2009 - 2:39 pm 5. K:Sounds like a great opportunity for an entrepreneur and a cheap internet phone scrambler.
Nov 30, 2009 - 2:32 am