Roger L. Simon

August 11th, 2004 5:02 am

Chalibification Continues

A WSJ editorial questions this week’s accusations against controversial Iraqi politician Ahmed Chalabi:

Meanwhile, Iraq’s Central Bank Governor has said that he issued no counterfeiting complaint against Ahmed Chalabi, contrary to the claims of the accusing judge in this case. As for the murder charges the same judge has levied against Salem–a respected lawyer in charge of the tribunal prosecuting Saddam and his henchmen–even Ahmed’s enemies say they find them incredible.

Okay, what gives?

But such service apparently wasn’t enough to save Mr. Chalabi from all the enemies he made while lobbying for a war that much of the Washington establishment bitterly opposed. Sometime early this year the decision was taken at the highest levels of the Administration to stabilize Iraq by reaching out to disaffected members of Saddam’s Baath Party and to call on the United Nations for help. The Journal has been able to confirm that a document was drafted in the National Security Council outlining strategies to marginalize Mr. Chalabi, who was sure to be critical of U.S. plans, and who was then the most powerful member of the Governing Council.

One particular concern vis-a-vis the U.N. strategy was that Mr. Chalabi was starting to expose the massive corruption that had characterized the Oil for Food program. Just prior the May raid, Mr. Bremer shut down the KPMG investigation that Mr. Chalabi had initiated, and hired accountants Ernst & Young instead, for no apparent reason other than delay.

Uh-huh… Not far away… one article down in WSJ Online… Claudia Rosett writes:

And then, of course, there’s the hoard of documents allegedly held by Ahmad Chalabi, head of the Iraqi National Congress. Mr. Chalabi was one of the first to call for serious investigation of Oil-for-Food, based on what he has described as “damning documents” found in government offices in Baghdad, implicating senior officials of both the U.N. and various unnamed nations. Mr. Chalabi, according to his Washington-based adviser, Francis Brooke, recovered enough of Saddam’s paperwork last year to fill three basketball courts chest-high. Of this hoard, says Mr. Brooke, some 20,000 pages relate directly to Oil-for-Food, most of them from the files of the Finance Ministry–which was just one of the many Iraqi ministries involved in this program.

Since Mr. Chalabi first called for that investigation, the discrediting in some quarters of anything he has to say, including his charges about Oil-for-Food, has proceeded apace. In May, U.S. authorities raided his home and office. This week an Iraqi judge issued a warrant for Mr. Chalabi’s arrest, on counterfeiting charges–an intriguing allegation in an environment where a considerable number of still un-arrested people appear to have been involved for years in the embezzlement of billions of entirely genuine dollars, hand-over-iron-fist.

It’s going to take a modern Thucydides to get to the root of this, but one thing is sure — hardball is being played at a level far more interesting than anything that ever appears on Chris Matthews.

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

5 Comments

1. Swopa:

Roger, after all your cries for the mainstream media to begin covering this subject, it’s interesting that you seemed to have missed the New York Times article yesterday on Paul Volcker’s investigation:

Speaking at a news conference near the panel’s temporary offices next to the United Nations, Mr. Volcker said his staff of 50, more than half of them American, has already identified and gained access to about 15 million pages of United Nations records of the program in Baghdad and New York. The panel has also interviewed witnesses and law enforcement authorities in several countries and is opening offices in Baghdad, New York and Paris.

. . . Mr. Volcker said his panel had not yet received the original list of oil vouchers supposedly awarded to diplomats and United Nations officials, which was published by an Iraqi newspaper several months ago.

Well, well, well, who’s not being “transparent” now? Kind of curious, when you realize that that the easiest way to force things into the open would be for Al-Mada (the Iraqi paper) to duplicate the list and distribute it to everyone in the world. You know, kind of like the Taguba report into the abuses at Abu Ghraib.

But then, who could have guessed that the Al-Mada list would be so elusive? Oh, yeah, I did, three months ago. And a month before that, I warned that the the Chalabi-centric nature of the controversy made it suspect.

But since I’m just a lying lefty troll who doesn’t have Roger’s eagle eye for the truth, I guess I must have just gotten lucky. ;-)

(Hey, Roger, if you get a chance — did that backup CD of Claude Hankes-Drielsma’s ever turn up? You know, the one that you said Claudia Rosett confirmed he had? Sure would be awkward if that turned out not to be so, wouldn’t it? “As they say in court, if a witness lies about one thing…”)

Aug 11, 2004 - 6:33 am 2. Terrye:

Swopa:

Don’t be so damn snarky.

I have no idea if Chalabi is guilty of the charges against him or not. He may well have played both against the middle, happens all the time. I think there is a lot of jockying for power going in Iraq right now and it might be a long time before we know the truth. I hear he is actually more popular now because he is seen as a victim. Who knows?

But one thing is for sure, if it had been left up to the lying lefties [which you referred to] there would have been no investigation of the food for oil scandal in the first damn place. People in Iraq would still be getting rotten food and watered down medicine and France would still be swapping security councel votes for oil deals and Chalabi would still be working with the CIA just like he did before Bush and the neocons ever came to Washington and you would not give a goddam one way or the other.

Aug 11, 2004 - 2:29 pm 3. Dale Gribble:

Ledeen and the Department of Defense are Chabli supporters.State and the UN hate him. I’ll give Chabli the benefit of the doubt for the time being.

Aug 11, 2004 - 3:44 pm 4. hollywood:

I don’t believe anything about Chalabi, but I am impressed that he’s returned to Iraq. That’s gutsy.

Aug 11, 2004 - 3:52 pm 5. hollywood:

I don’t believe anything about Chalabi, but I am impressed that he’s returned to Iraq. That’s gutsy.

Aug 11, 2004 - 3:52 pm

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments:
 

Roger L Simon

Author Photo
The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media

Just Published

Blacklisting MyselfWith gratitude to the readers of this blog without whom my new -- and first non-fiction -- book would likely never have been written.

Simon's first non-fiction book - Blacklisting Myself: Memoir of a Hollywood Apostate in an Age of Terror - Pub. date: February 5, 2009

Archives

Books