<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Dinosaur Lumbers In&#8230; Excuse Me,  a Mammoth!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:00:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandy P</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7528</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 03:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7528</guid>
		<description>--The blindness is in those who say it is just doing its job. It is not. It is accumulating excess power. What right is protected when a judge takes over a school district (Kansas City) and runs it down to the last detail, even creating new facilities and raising taxes (without representation) to pay for it?--



Quadrupled prop taxes, they had stuff that almost any school district would drool over, and after between $2-$4 BILLION and about 16 years, STILL couldn&#039;t get accredited.



Anyone tells me more money for schools, I ask them to explain KC, MO.



They don&#039;t even know what I&#039;m talking about.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211;The blindness is in those who say it is just doing its job. It is not. It is accumulating excess power. What right is protected when a judge takes over a school district (Kansas City) and runs it down to the last detail, even creating new facilities and raising taxes (without representation) to pay for it?&#8211;</p>
<p>Quadrupled prop taxes, they had stuff that almost any school district would drool over, and after between $2-$4 BILLION and about 16 years, STILL couldn&#8217;t get accredited.</p>
<p>Anyone tells me more money for schools, I ask them to explain KC, MO.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t even know what I&#8217;m talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard mcenroe</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7527</link>
		<dc:creator>richard mcenroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 03:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7527</guid>
		<description>Charlie (Harkin) ó FWIW: It turns out Harkin was a shuttle pilot, assigned to fly jets from Vietnam back to higher-echelon service depots in Japan.  This would not have involved take-offs and landings at night and in inclement weather, since the need was not essential to the mission, unlike the air-defense missions ANG units in the states were flying.  Also, even though the planes were being flown to Japan for servicing, they would have been certified as flight-worthy before being released from Vietnam.  And the F-4 and F-8 Crusader both had vastly better safety records than the F-102.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie (Harkin) ó FWIW: It turns out Harkin was a shuttle pilot, assigned to fly jets from Vietnam back to higher-echelon service depots in Japan.  This would not have involved take-offs and landings at night and in inclement weather, since the need was not essential to the mission, unlike the air-defense missions ANG units in the states were flying.  Also, even though the planes were being flown to Japan for servicing, they would have been certified as flight-worthy before being released from Vietnam.  And the F-4 and F-8 Crusader both had vastly better safety records than the F-102.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7526</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7526</guid>
		<description>http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/articles/2004/08/18/kerry_disputes_allegations_on_cambodia?mode=PF



notice how the tone of a pro Kerry Boston Globe reporter is starting to shift.



The anti-Kerry quote was the last one in the article.



========



Why was John Kerry mistaken about Christmas eve in Cambodia? Because poor John&#039;s brain was seared. He has never been the same since. He said so himself.





What is the War Hero Afraid of?



Form 180. Release ALL the records.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/articles/2004/08/18/kerry_disputes_allegations_on_cambodia?mode=PF" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/articles/2004/08/18/kerry_disputes_allegations_on_cambodia?mode=PF</a></p>
<p>notice how the tone of a pro Kerry Boston Globe reporter is starting to shift.</p>
<p>The anti-Kerry quote was the last one in the article.</p>
<p>========</p>
<p>Why was John Kerry mistaken about Christmas eve in Cambodia? Because poor John&#8217;s brain was seared. He has never been the same since. He said so himself.</p>
<p>What is the War Hero Afraid of?</p>
<p>Form 180. Release ALL the records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7525</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7525</guid>
		<description>Charlie, Fresh Air:



I said limited defense.  I clearly stated that he was out of line in his personal attack on Cheney.  I just thought fair is fair.  If I am going to cite the risks of service in defense of GWB I felt it necessary to go the extra mile and point out that Harkins&#039; service was hardly risk free.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie, Fresh Air:</p>
<p>I said limited defense.  I clearly stated that he was out of line in his personal attack on Cheney.  I just thought fair is fair.  If I am going to cite the risks of service in defense of GWB I felt it necessary to go the extra mile and point out that Harkins&#8217; service was hardly risk free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie (Colorado)</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7524</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie (Colorado)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7524</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I am going to come to Harkins defense in a limited manner. If Harkins was a Naval Aviator then he bore a substantial peacetime risk, unless he flew P-3s which are little more than glorified airliners. If he flew carrier based aircraft or Helos he bore the same flying Risks as GWB with the added risk of operating at sea.&lt;/i&gt;



Jerry, I agree with you, except in that it appears Harkin claimed to have actually been in combat.  Flying fighters, good.  Lying about your combat record, bad.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I am going to come to Harkins defense in a limited manner. If Harkins was a Naval Aviator then he bore a substantial peacetime risk, unless he flew P-3s which are little more than glorified airliners. If he flew carrier based aircraft or Helos he bore the same flying Risks as GWB with the added risk of operating at sea.</i></p>
<p>Jerry, I agree with you, except in that it appears Harkin claimed to have actually been in combat.  Flying fighters, good.  Lying about your combat record, bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh Air</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7523</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7523</guid>
		<description>Jerry--



Okay. I suppose a little braggadocio is par for the course with Harkin. But let&#039;s not forget Harkin is &lt;i&gt;still&lt;/i&gt; a horse&#039;s ass.



Tying this back down to Kerry, I ran across an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usenetarchive.org/Dir2/File627.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;  from the good old days when Foreign Ministers Harkin and Kerry were trying to business with another communist, Danny Ortega.



Let&#039;s take a trip down memory lane to 1985:



&lt;blockquote&gt;Reagan was in the middle of a delicate balancing act - seeking the release of a $14 million appropriation for the Nicaraguan resistance.



On the table: an offer to limit U.S. aid to the Contras to humanitarian assistance. The quid pro quo: the Sandinistas would agree to national reconciliation and free elections.



The scene was set for Kerry to bluster into the equation like a bull in a China shop.



Teaming with Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, the pair - without portfolio - traveled to Managua to chat with Sandinista junta leader Daniel Ortega.



The result: a meaningless document that State Department experts considered little more than an offer to the Contras to surrender. The Sandinistas made no commitment to national reconciliation, and that was the heart of the matter.



Nonetheless, Kerry raced back to Washington with the document he touted as a &quot;peace proposal.&quot;



&quot;Here,&quot; Kerry boldly pronounced to the Senate, &quot;is a guarantee of the security interest of the United States.&quot;...



But few bought the grandstanding. Overnight, Kerry found himself not the returning hero and peacemaker but a pariah....



A frantic Kerry had his staff seek out anybody willing to praise his efforts. The only takers were Sens. &lt;b&gt;Teddy Kennedy&lt;/b&gt;, D-Mass., and &lt;b&gt;Robert Byrd&lt;/b&gt;, D-W.Va., who styled the controversial mission to Managua as a masterstroke forcing a recalcitrant Reagan to parley with the commies.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Ah yes, I remember it well. And to think these two Chamberlains could have accounted for 100% of the Democratic ticket this year.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry&#8211;</p>
<p>Okay. I suppose a little braggadocio is par for the course with Harkin. But let&#8217;s not forget Harkin is <i>still</i> a horse&#8217;s ass.</p>
<p>Tying this back down to Kerry, I ran across an <a href="http://www.usenetarchive.org/Dir2/File627.html" rel="nofollow">article</a>  from the good old days when Foreign Ministers Harkin and Kerry were trying to business with another communist, Danny Ortega.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a trip down memory lane to 1985:</p>
<blockquote><p>Reagan was in the middle of a delicate balancing act &#8211; seeking the release of a $14 million appropriation for the Nicaraguan resistance.</p>
<p>On the table: an offer to limit U.S. aid to the Contras to humanitarian assistance. The quid pro quo: the Sandinistas would agree to national reconciliation and free elections.</p>
<p>The scene was set for Kerry to bluster into the equation like a bull in a China shop.</p>
<p>Teaming with Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, the pair &#8211; without portfolio &#8211; traveled to Managua to chat with Sandinista junta leader Daniel Ortega.</p>
<p>The result: a meaningless document that State Department experts considered little more than an offer to the Contras to surrender. The Sandinistas made no commitment to national reconciliation, and that was the heart of the matter.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, Kerry raced back to Washington with the document he touted as a &#8220;peace proposal.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Here,&#8221; Kerry boldly pronounced to the Senate, &#8220;is a guarantee of the security interest of the United States.&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>But few bought the grandstanding. Overnight, Kerry found himself not the returning hero and peacemaker but a pariah&#8230;.</p>
<p>A frantic Kerry had his staff seek out anybody willing to praise his efforts. The only takers were Sens. <b>Teddy Kennedy</b>, D-Mass., and <b>Robert Byrd</b>, D-W.Va., who styled the controversial mission to Managua as a masterstroke forcing a recalcitrant Reagan to parley with the commies.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah yes, I remember it well. And to think these two Chamberlains could have accounted for 100% of the Democratic ticket this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie (Colorado)</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7522</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie (Colorado)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7522</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The blindness is in those who say it is just doing its job. It is not. It is accumulating excess power. What right is protected when a judge takes over a school district (Kansas City) and runs it down to the last detail, even creating new facilities and raising taxes (without representation) to pay for it?&lt;/i&gt;



Now, &lt;i&gt;here&lt;/i&gt; you&#039;ve got a point.  It seems a bit of a stretch for a court to be able to compel a school district in this way.



But then that wasn&#039;t the original issue -- it was the more general, black and white issue of whether a court should be able to &quot;legislate from the bench&quot;.



If we deny courts the ability to override the legislature, we eliminate the primary way it has to protect our rights.



Once we allow for it &lt;i&gt;at all&lt;/i&gt; we&#039;re back to arguing whether a particular action was wise or not -- and I&#039;d be the last person to suggest that every action of every court has been wise.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The blindness is in those who say it is just doing its job. It is not. It is accumulating excess power. What right is protected when a judge takes over a school district (Kansas City) and runs it down to the last detail, even creating new facilities and raising taxes (without representation) to pay for it?</i></p>
<p>Now, <i>here</i> you&#8217;ve got a point.  It seems a bit of a stretch for a court to be able to compel a school district in this way.</p>
<p>But then that wasn&#8217;t the original issue &#8212; it was the more general, black and white issue of whether a court should be able to &#8220;legislate from the bench&#8221;.</p>
<p>If we deny courts the ability to override the legislature, we eliminate the primary way it has to protect our rights.</p>
<p>Once we allow for it <i>at all</i> we&#8217;re back to arguing whether a particular action was wise or not &#8212; and I&#8217;d be the last person to suggest that every action of every court has been wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie (Colorado)</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7521</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie (Colorado)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7521</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Only when I, my family, my country and my beliefs are not on the endangered species list.&lt;/i&gt;



So, uh, Sandy -- what you want is for the Court to find a &quot;national defense exemption&quot; that&#039;s not written in the law?



I thought we were &lt;i&gt;complaining&lt;/i&gt; that the Court was legislating from the bench?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Only when I, my family, my country and my beliefs are not on the endangered species list.</i></p>
<p>So, uh, Sandy &#8212; what you want is for the Court to find a &#8220;national defense exemption&#8221; that&#8217;s not written in the law?</p>
<p>I thought we were <i>complaining</i> that the Court was legislating from the bench?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syl</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7520</link>
		<dc:creator>Syl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7520</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care about Harkins&#039; bona fides. Cheney criticized something Kerry said, and in return Harkins blasted Cheney&#039;s character.



Mort Kondrake, an eminently reasonable man. A man I&#039;ve never been able to figure how he votes, is furious at the ad hominems coming out of Democratic mouths. He says the Democrats have been far worse than the Republicans as far as dirty campaigning goes...which left Juan Williams sputtering and outraged at the very thought.



I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever seen Mort so angry.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care about Harkins&#8217; bona fides. Cheney criticized something Kerry said, and in return Harkins blasted Cheney&#8217;s character.</p>
<p>Mort Kondrake, an eminently reasonable man. A man I&#8217;ve never been able to figure how he votes, is furious at the ad hominems coming out of Democratic mouths. He says the Democrats have been far worse than the Republicans as far as dirty campaigning goes&#8230;which left Juan Williams sputtering and outraged at the very thought.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever seen Mort so angry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7519</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/17/a-dinosaur-lumbers-in-excuse-me-a-mammoth/#comment-7519</guid>
		<description>I am going to come to Harkins defense in a limited manner.  If Harkins was a Naval Aviator then he bore a substantial peacetime risk, unless he flew P-3s which are little more than glorified airliners.  If he flew carrier based aircraft or Helos he bore the same flying Risks as GWB with the added risk of operating at sea.  So lets not denigrate Harkins&#039; service per se, however much he was out of line about his personal attack on Dick Cheney.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to come to Harkins defense in a limited manner.  If Harkins was a Naval Aviator then he bore a substantial peacetime risk, unless he flew P-3s which are little more than glorified airliners.  If he flew carrier based aircraft or Helos he bore the same flying Risks as GWB with the added risk of operating at sea.  So lets not denigrate Harkins&#8217; service per se, however much he was out of line about his personal attack on Dick Cheney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
