<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Convention Blogging Worth It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:16:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LemonDrop</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11023</link>
		<dc:creator>LemonDrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11023</guid>
		<description>Love your site. But really, do you care if there are celebrities there?  How can they contribute better than the Mothers and Fathers there?  Or rather, who represents mainstream America better?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your site. But really, do you care if there are celebrities there?  How can they contribute better than the Mothers and Fathers there?  Or rather, who represents mainstream America better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bostonian</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11022</link>
		<dc:creator>Bostonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11022</guid>
		<description>Absolutely it&#039;s worth it, Roger!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely it&#8217;s worth it, Roger!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard mcenroe</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11021</link>
		<dc:creator>richard mcenroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 04:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11021</guid>
		<description>Ben ó Don&#039;t &lt;i&gt;ever&lt;/i&gt; change the channel if Milton Friedman wants to watch the damn World Series...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben ó Don&#8217;t <i>ever</i> change the channel if Milton Friedman wants to watch the damn World Series&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holdfast</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11020</link>
		<dc:creator>holdfast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 04:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11020</guid>
		<description>Jason Priestley is pulling for Bush?  Cool - I guess that makes 2 from my old high school (Argyle Secondary, North Van, BC, Peoples Soviet Republic of Canuckistan)


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason Priestley is pulling for Bush?  Cool &#8211; I guess that makes 2 from my old high school (Argyle Secondary, North Van, BC, Peoples Soviet Republic of Canuckistan)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ballard</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11019</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ballard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 04:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11019</guid>
		<description>Catherine,



This is an RV poll, not an LV so you have to assume a 3%-5% Dem shift. You picked up 80% of the &quot;news&quot; in the poll but one other item that caught my eye was the &quot;Strong Enthusiasm for Candidate&quot; question where Kerry has cratered from 56% on August 1 to 40% now. Essentially, the Dem convention did absolutley nothing for him while Bush&#039;s numbers moved in the opposite direction &lt;i&gt;prior&lt;/i&gt; to the start of the Rep convention.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catherine,</p>
<p>This is an RV poll, not an LV so you have to assume a 3%-5% Dem shift. You picked up 80% of the &#8220;news&#8221; in the poll but one other item that caught my eye was the &#8220;Strong Enthusiasm for Candidate&#8221; question where Kerry has cratered from 56% on August 1 to 40% now. Essentially, the Dem convention did absolutley nothing for him while Bush&#8217;s numbers moved in the opposite direction <i>prior</i> to the start of the Rep convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ballard</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11018</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ballard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 04:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11018</guid>
		<description>Catherine,



This is an RV poll, not an LV so you have to assume a 3%-5% Dem shift. You picked up 80% of the &quot;news&quot; in the poll but one other item that caught my eye was the &quot;Strong Enthusiasm for Candidate&quot; question where Kerry has cratered from 56% on August 1 to 40% now. Essentially, the Dem convention did absolutley nothing for him while Bush&#039;s numbers moved in the opposite direction
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catherine,</p>
<p>This is an RV poll, not an LV so you have to assume a 3%-5% Dem shift. You picked up 80% of the &#8220;news&#8221; in the poll but one other item that caught my eye was the &#8220;Strong Enthusiasm for Candidate&#8221; question where Kerry has cratered from 56% on August 1 to 40% now. Essentially, the Dem convention did absolutley nothing for him while Bush&#8217;s numbers moved in the opposite direction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11017</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 03:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11017</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Catherine AZ&lt;/b&gt;



Here&#039;s the ABC Poll on Kerry &amp; the military:



&lt;i&gt;This poll suggests collateral damage rather than a direct hit from the &quot;swift boat&quot; ads questioning Kerry&#039;s military service. They may have moved Kerry off his message, and they may have sown some doubts among a minority of registered voters: Four in 10 either don&#039;t think Kerry legitimately earned his medals (23 percent) or are unsure (17 percent). That includes 36 percent of independents and 18 percent of Democrats, soaring to 64 percent of Republicans.



&lt;i&gt;Still, however, six in 10 believe Kerry did earn his decorations, and 67 percent disapprove of the ads. Fewer, though, 42 percent, accept his contention that the Bush campaign was behind them.



. . .



&lt;i&gt;There may be more potential downside for Kerry in a separate issue, his prominent opposition to the Vietnam War after leaving the military. Twenty-one percent say they&#039;re more likely to vote for him because of this activity, but 26 percent are less likely to support him. Specifically among veterans, moreover, it&#039;s 20 percent &quot;more likely,&quot; but 38 percent less so.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Catherine AZ</b></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the ABC Poll on Kerry &amp; the military:</p>
<p><i>This poll suggests collateral damage rather than a direct hit from the &#8220;swift boat&#8221; ads questioning Kerry&#8217;s military service. They may have moved Kerry off his message, and they may have sown some doubts among a minority of registered voters: Four in 10 either don&#8217;t think Kerry legitimately earned his medals (23 percent) or are unsure (17 percent). That includes 36 percent of independents and 18 percent of Democrats, soaring to 64 percent of Republicans.</p>
<p></i><i>Still, however, six in 10 believe Kerry did earn his decorations, and 67 percent disapprove of the ads. Fewer, though, 42 percent, accept his contention that the Bush campaign was behind them.</p>
<p>. . .</p>
<p></i><i>There may be more potential downside for Kerry in a separate issue, his prominent opposition to the Vietnam War after leaving the military. Twenty-one percent say they&#8217;re more likely to vote for him because of this activity, but 26 percent are less likely to support him. Specifically among veterans, moreover, it&#8217;s 20 percent &#8220;more likely,&#8221; but 38 percent less so.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yehudit</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11016</link>
		<dc:creator>Yehudit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 03:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11016</guid>
		<description>Gee, I wish I knew you guys by sight. I was at the NR party talking with Roger too. 5&#039;0&quot;, glasses, brown hair in a clip, red skirt. If you want to touch base during the week, go over to Kesher Talk and email me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I wish I knew you guys by sight. I was at the NR party talking with Roger too. 5&#8242;0&#8243;, glasses, brown hair in a clip, red skirt. If you want to touch base during the week, go over to Kesher Talk and email me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11015</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 03:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11015</guid>
		<description>And here is this, from today&#039;s ABC News poll:



&lt;i&gt;Personal favorability, the most basic measure of a public figure&#039;s popularity, is another problem for Kerry. Last March, as he emerged victorious from the Democratic primaries, 54 percent of Americans had a favorable opinion of him, 26 percent unfavorable. On Aug. 1, after his convention, it was 51 percent to 32 percent. Today it&#039;s 43 percent to 40 percent.&lt;/i&gt;



http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/Vote2004/bush_convention_poll_040829.html




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here is this, from today&#8217;s ABC News poll:</p>
<p><i>Personal favorability, the most basic measure of a public figure&#8217;s popularity, is another problem for Kerry. Last March, as he emerged victorious from the Democratic primaries, 54 percent of Americans had a favorable opinion of him, 26 percent unfavorable. On Aug. 1, after his convention, it was 51 percent to 32 percent. Today it&#8217;s 43 percent to 40 percent.</i></p>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/Vote2004/bush_convention_poll_040829.html" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/Vote2004/bush_convention_poll_040829.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11014</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 03:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/08/30/is-convention-blogging-worth-it/#comment-11014</guid>
		<description>G-O-O-O-O-O------R-U-D-Y-----!!!!!!!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G-O-O-O-O-O&#8212;&#8212;R-U-D-Y&#8212;&#8211;!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
