<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mainstream Media Needs a Comments Section</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:15:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13303</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13303</guid>
		<description>Rumors of provenance:



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1211690/posts
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumors of provenance:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1211690/posts" rel="nofollow">http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1211690/posts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh Air</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13302</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 04:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13302</guid>
		<description>Charlie--



&lt;i&gt;Jeez, Penwil, a journalism degree? You seem like such a nice guy.&lt;/i&gt;



I believe Penwil is in fact a &lt;b&gt;lady&lt;/b&gt;. Not all vets on this board are guys, Charlie.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie&#8211;</p>
<p><i>Jeez, Penwil, a journalism degree? You seem like such a nice guy.</i></p>
<p>I believe Penwil is in fact a <b>lady</b>. Not all vets on this board are guys, Charlie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justice</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13301</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 04:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13301</guid>
		<description>The MSM doesn&#039;t seem like it&#039;s going to cover for CBS on this one.  The local ABC affiliate aired an audio of Killian&#039;s widow doubting the document&#039;s authenticity on the 11:00 news.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MSM doesn&#8217;t seem like it&#8217;s going to cover for CBS on this one.  The local ABC affiliate aired an audio of Killian&#8217;s widow doubting the document&#8217;s authenticity on the 11:00 news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard mcenroe</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13300</link>
		<dc:creator>richard mcenroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 04:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13300</guid>
		<description>Charlie(Colorado) ó In an effort to reestablish its journalistic credibility, CBS News today announced it was letting go two student interns and ordering Dan Rather and Katie Couric to slap the coffee-cart lady...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie(Colorado) ó In an effort to reestablish its journalistic credibility, CBS News today announced it was letting go two student interns and ordering Dan Rather and Katie Couric to slap the coffee-cart lady&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13299</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 03:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13299</guid>
		<description>Wichita, thank you, now I know why I feel this glow of well-being inside me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wichita, thank you, now I know why I feel this glow of well-being inside me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie (Colorado)</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13298</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie (Colorado)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 03:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13298</guid>
		<description>Jerry, the problem is that the FCC doesn&#039;t actually grant CBS a broadcast franchise; those are held by the individual stations.  The most they could do is fine the stations that CBS owns directly.



Even that&#039;s unlikely, though: CNN didn&#039;t close down over Peter Arnett, they just fired him.  Someone at CBS will be found who was responsible for the letters coming in; they&#039;ll be looking for work, probably in another field.



&lt;i&gt;Charlie (C)

Close but no cigar--try this&lt;/i&gt;



Hey, it&#039;s been 35 years.



(Hell, it works for Kerry....)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, the problem is that the FCC doesn&#8217;t actually grant CBS a broadcast franchise; those are held by the individual stations.  The most they could do is fine the stations that CBS owns directly.</p>
<p>Even that&#8217;s unlikely, though: CNN didn&#8217;t close down over Peter Arnett, they just fired him.  Someone at CBS will be found who was responsible for the letters coming in; they&#8217;ll be looking for work, probably in another field.</p>
<p><i>Charlie (C)</p>
<p>Close but no cigar&#8211;try this</i></p>
<p>Hey, it&#8217;s been 35 years.</p>
<p>(Hell, it works for Kerry&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13297</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 02:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13297</guid>
		<description>John:



I respectfully disagree on the seriousness of CBS&#039;s situation visa via its broadcasting licenses if they were a willing participant in this kind of fraud.  First of all this letter has status of an official US Government document. Forging a government document is a serious felony.  If they are using a forged US government document to try to influence an election then that is certain a violation of the public service clause of their franchise.  If pressed on the issue I don&#039;t think the FCC would have choice but revoke CBS&#039;s broadcasting franchise.  If the fraud was perpetrated as a stupid result of their partisanship the market will take care of them.  But if it is willful they need to be removed from the public airways.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:</p>
<p>I respectfully disagree on the seriousness of CBS&#8217;s situation visa via its broadcasting licenses if they were a willing participant in this kind of fraud.  First of all this letter has status of an official US Government document. Forging a government document is a serious felony.  If they are using a forged US government document to try to influence an election then that is certain a violation of the public service clause of their franchise.  If pressed on the issue I don&#8217;t think the FCC would have choice but revoke CBS&#8217;s broadcasting franchise.  If the fraud was perpetrated as a stupid result of their partisanship the market will take care of them.  But if it is willful they need to be removed from the public airways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RogerA</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13296</link>
		<dc:creator>RogerA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 02:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13296</guid>
		<description>Charlie (C)

Close but no cigar--try this



Letter format



To:  1LT George W. Bush



Subject:  Flight Physical



1.  Records indicate your flight physical is due on XXXX.  You may not remain in flight status unless you successfully pass your flight physical.



2.  You are hereby directed to take your flight physical on XXXXXXXXXX.



3.  Reply by endorsement hereon when you receive this letter; advise me when you have completed your physical.





XXXXXXXXX

LtCol, USAF (thats what the airforce uses; Army uses LTC)


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie (C)</p>
<p>Close but no cigar&#8211;try this</p>
<p>Letter format</p>
<p>To:  1LT George W. Bush</p>
<p>Subject:  Flight Physical</p>
<p>1.  Records indicate your flight physical is due on XXXX.  You may not remain in flight status unless you successfully pass your flight physical.</p>
<p>2.  You are hereby directed to take your flight physical on XXXXXXXXXX.</p>
<p>3.  Reply by endorsement hereon when you receive this letter; advise me when you have completed your physical.</p>
<p>XXXXXXXXX</p>
<p>LtCol, USAF (thats what the airforce uses; Army uses LTC)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard mcenroe</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13295</link>
		<dc:creator>richard mcenroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 02:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13295</guid>
		<description>Charlie (Colorado) ó Woulda worked in my 201 file...



Lindenen ó You still don&#039;t get it...



We shouldn&#039;t criticize Kerry&#039;s fraudulent Viet Nam medals  because it was a long time ago and doesn&#039;t matter today.



We shouldn&#039;t criticize Kerry&#039;s antiwar activities and traffic with the enemy because it was a long time ago and doesn&#039;t matter today.



We shouldn&#039;t criticize Kerry&#039;s legislative record because, well, face it that never mattered.



But we shouldn&#039;t criticize people lying about Bush&#039;s guard service  a long time ago because that&#039;s terribly important today and might get Bush in real trouble.  Got it now?



I am kicking myself for not having a job where I have web access.  I&#039;ve been missing this all day...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie (Colorado) ó Woulda worked in my 201 file&#8230;</p>
<p>Lindenen ó You still don&#8217;t get it&#8230;</p>
<p>We shouldn&#8217;t criticize Kerry&#8217;s fraudulent Viet Nam medals  because it was a long time ago and doesn&#8217;t matter today.</p>
<p>We shouldn&#8217;t criticize Kerry&#8217;s antiwar activities and traffic with the enemy because it was a long time ago and doesn&#8217;t matter today.</p>
<p>We shouldn&#8217;t criticize Kerry&#8217;s legislative record because, well, face it that never mattered.</p>
<p>But we shouldn&#8217;t criticize people lying about Bush&#8217;s guard service  a long time ago because that&#8217;s terribly important today and might get Bush in real trouble.  Got it now?</p>
<p>I am kicking myself for not having a job where I have web access.  I&#8217;ve been missing this all day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie (Colorado)</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13294</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie (Colorado)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 02:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/09/mainstream-media-needs-a-comments-section/#comment-13294</guid>
		<description>Jeez, Penwil, a journalism degree?  You seem like such a nice guy.



But I think the phrasing thing is right on target: if that were a real military memo, it would have read like





1. Re Bush, G.W. 1LT XXXXXXXXXXXX



2. As of date this memo, subject officer has not completed physical examination  required per AFR XX-XXX.



3. Subject officer is hereby directed to complete said physical examination as soon as possible.



4.  Subject officer will reply by endorsement noting date and outcome.



(signed)

X. Y. KILLIAN

LTC USAFR

Commanding







[Jerry, John, How&#039;d I do.  It&#039;s been &lt;i&gt;years&lt;/i&gt; since I wrote something like this.]
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, Penwil, a journalism degree?  You seem like such a nice guy.</p>
<p>But I think the phrasing thing is right on target: if that were a real military memo, it would have read like</p>
<p>1. Re Bush, G.W. 1LT XXXXXXXXXXXX</p>
<p>2. As of date this memo, subject officer has not completed physical examination  required per AFR XX-XXX.</p>
<p>3. Subject officer is hereby directed to complete said physical examination as soon as possible.</p>
<p>4.  Subject officer will reply by endorsement noting date and outcome.</p>
<p>(signed)</p>
<p>X. Y. KILLIAN</p>
<p>LTC USAFR</p>
<p>Commanding</p>
<p>[Jerry, John, How'd I do.  It's been <i>years</i> since I wrote something like this.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
