<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surrealism from Sixty Minutes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:39:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandy P</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15440</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15440</guid>
		<description>I watched Pat Caddell during the 2000 election, he was honorable then.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched Pat Caddell during the 2000 election, he was honorable then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vegetius</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15439</link>
		<dc:creator>vegetius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15439</guid>
		<description>Dennis:



&quot;Wouldn&#039;t it have been easier just to pull down his pants and sit on some uncooked rice?&quot;



You&#039;ve got me ROTFLMAO. I&#039;m going to use a variant

of this re JFK&#039;s second purple heart on my favorite Dems.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis:</p>
<p>&#8220;Wouldn&#8217;t it have been easier just to pull down his pants and sit on some uncooked rice?&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got me ROTFLMAO. I&#8217;m going to use a variant</p>
<p>of this re JFK&#8217;s second purple heart on my favorite Dems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knucklehead</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15438</link>
		<dc:creator>Knucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15438</guid>
		<description>Samuel,



No Clintonista.  I voted for Carter because I thought he had character.  I&#039;ve since learned otherwise, but back then I had no good grasp of what &quot;character&quot; actually was.



The first time I watched Clinton when he first surfaced out of nowhere I was convinced the guy was a sleazebag.  The Carter Lesson taught me, eventually, that I should not vote for a candidate with questionable character.  What finally drove that home to me was another, non-national vote, for another man of little or no discernable character that I made because I fell into the &quot;abortion trap&quot;.  Oddly enough, I am personally middling opposed to abortion but defer to the women on the issue, so I voted for the &quot;pro-choice&quot; candidate because the other one seemed too stridently &quot;pro-life&quot;.  It turned out Candidate Pro-Choice was devoid of character while the other one went on to demonstrate he was a man of good character.  Slowly, but surely, I realized that &quot;a woman&#039;s right to choose&quot; is not in any jeopardy and it is a false issue (as is gun-control by and large) and that character is the primary issue.



This particular election has tossed a whole lot of my previous &quot;convictions&quot; up in the air.  I swore to myself that I would never again be a &quot;single issue&quot; voter and would, instead, vote for the candidate I saw as having greater character. Now comes 2004 and I find that in this election the WoT is the single issue I will not ignore.  Its not a serious challenge because I believe Bush has  character and Kerry doesn&#039;t.



I&#039;m also faced with my long growing and increasing strong belief that the Democratic Party is corrupt to the core.  I can never articulate this to people but, up until now, I have not been &quot;Republican&quot;, I&#039;ve just long been &quot;anti-Democrat&quot;.  The realizations that pushed me in that direction started to form back in HS but I never gave them enough thought (it had to do with unions being exempt from assault and property destruction laws - I witnessed it first hand, it bothered me, but it took me a long time to figure out what the heck I&#039;d seen).  There were many other realizations over time but thing really started to come together for me when I put my children into the public school system.  Then I slowly but surely realized that resistance to the &quot;social engineering&quot; crap the Dems have so long pushed is not a matter of NIMBY or bigotry.  Its a straightforward matter of &quot;Screw you, Jack, you don&#039;t get to run your stupid experiments on my kids.  I have one shot at this parenthood thing and I ain&#039;t handing it over to Moonbat Hackery.&quot;



What I&#039;ve witnessed from the Dems (and their PR arm, the MSM) over the past three years has convinced me to finally forego my false-flag Independent status and register as a Republican).   The meltdown and corruption of the Dems is so complete, so deep, that I believe it demonstrates a fundamental character flaw in anyone who runs for election or actively supports the Dems.  They&#039;ve become so bad that I must take the other side even if it isn&#039;t perfect.



What an odd world.  Isn&#039;t life grand!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel,</p>
<p>No Clintonista.  I voted for Carter because I thought he had character.  I&#8217;ve since learned otherwise, but back then I had no good grasp of what &#8220;character&#8221; actually was.</p>
<p>The first time I watched Clinton when he first surfaced out of nowhere I was convinced the guy was a sleazebag.  The Carter Lesson taught me, eventually, that I should not vote for a candidate with questionable character.  What finally drove that home to me was another, non-national vote, for another man of little or no discernable character that I made because I fell into the &#8220;abortion trap&#8221;.  Oddly enough, I am personally middling opposed to abortion but defer to the women on the issue, so I voted for the &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; candidate because the other one seemed too stridently &#8220;pro-life&#8221;.  It turned out Candidate Pro-Choice was devoid of character while the other one went on to demonstrate he was a man of good character.  Slowly, but surely, I realized that &#8220;a woman&#8217;s right to choose&#8221; is not in any jeopardy and it is a false issue (as is gun-control by and large) and that character is the primary issue.</p>
<p>This particular election has tossed a whole lot of my previous &#8220;convictions&#8221; up in the air.  I swore to myself that I would never again be a &#8220;single issue&#8221; voter and would, instead, vote for the candidate I saw as having greater character. Now comes 2004 and I find that in this election the WoT is the single issue I will not ignore.  Its not a serious challenge because I believe Bush has  character and Kerry doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also faced with my long growing and increasing strong belief that the Democratic Party is corrupt to the core.  I can never articulate this to people but, up until now, I have not been &#8220;Republican&#8221;, I&#8217;ve just long been &#8220;anti-Democrat&#8221;.  The realizations that pushed me in that direction started to form back in HS but I never gave them enough thought (it had to do with unions being exempt from assault and property destruction laws &#8211; I witnessed it first hand, it bothered me, but it took me a long time to figure out what the heck I&#8217;d seen).  There were many other realizations over time but thing really started to come together for me when I put my children into the public school system.  Then I slowly but surely realized that resistance to the &#8220;social engineering&#8221; crap the Dems have so long pushed is not a matter of NIMBY or bigotry.  Its a straightforward matter of &#8220;Screw you, Jack, you don&#8217;t get to run your stupid experiments on my kids.  I have one shot at this parenthood thing and I ain&#8217;t handing it over to Moonbat Hackery.&#8221;</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve witnessed from the Dems (and their PR arm, the MSM) over the past three years has convinced me to finally forego my false-flag Independent status and register as a Republican).   The meltdown and corruption of the Dems is so complete, so deep, that I believe it demonstrates a fundamental character flaw in anyone who runs for election or actively supports the Dems.  They&#8217;ve become so bad that I must take the other side even if it isn&#8217;t perfect.</p>
<p>What an odd world.  Isn&#8217;t life grand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15437</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15437</guid>
		<description>You know what . . . surely there must be eyewitness who can place Bill Burkett at Kinkos Sometime in the past couple weeks or so?  Anyone offering a bounty for these eyewitness to step forward?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what . . . surely there must be eyewitness who can place Bill Burkett at Kinkos Sometime in the past couple weeks or so?  Anyone offering a bounty for these eyewitness to step forward?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15436</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 05:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15436</guid>
		<description>ìBefore or after they were crumpled?î



Syl, you are killing meÖ.LOL


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ìBefore or after they were crumpled?î</p>
<p>Syl, you are killing meÖ.LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15435</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 05:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15435</guid>
		<description>Samuel,



Thank you for your wonderfully insightful (as always) response.

I posted my explanations on the original thread:

http://www.rogerlsimon.com/mt-archives/2004/09/the_first_words.php


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel,</p>
<p>Thank you for your wonderfully insightful (as always) response.</p>
<p>I posted my explanations on the original thread:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rogerlsimon.com/mt-archives/2004/09/the_first_words.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.rogerlsimon.com/mt-archives/2004/09/the_first_words.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ballard</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15434</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ballard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 05:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15434</guid>
		<description>Richard,



By Nov. 10 we&#039;ll be sandtabling Iran and handicapping the election in Iraq. It ain&#039;t even gonna slow down.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>By Nov. 10 we&#8217;ll be sandtabling Iran and handicapping the election in Iraq. It ain&#8217;t even gonna slow down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wiser</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15433</link>
		<dc:creator>wiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 05:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15433</guid>
		<description>Tammy Bruce pointed out the argument is basically circular.  &quot;Bush&#039;s accuser Barnes is no partisan liar.  His story is proven by these memos.&quot; &quot;But the memos are fake.&quot; &quot;No.  The memos are real.  They match what Barnes says.&quot;

It&#039;s the old &quot;The Bible is the Holy Word of God.&quot; &quot;How do you know that?&quot; &quot;It says so in the Bible.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy Bruce pointed out the argument is basically circular.  &#8220;Bush&#8217;s accuser Barnes is no partisan liar.  His story is proven by these memos.&#8221; &#8220;But the memos are fake.&#8221; &#8220;No.  The memos are real.  They match what Barnes says.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the old &#8220;The Bible is the Holy Word of God.&#8221; &#8220;How do you know that?&#8221; &#8220;It says so in the Bible.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard mcenroe</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15432</link>
		<dc:creator>richard mcenroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 05:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15432</guid>
		<description>Goof ó In the words of Bela Lugosi: &quot;...it never ends.  It may be over, but it never ends...&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goof ó In the words of Bela Lugosi: &#8220;&#8230;it never ends.  It may be over, but it never ends&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goof¬Æ</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15431</link>
		<dc:creator>Goof¬Æ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 04:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/15/surrealism-from-sixty-minutes/#comment-15431</guid>
		<description>Oh, and...love that Pat.



http://www.laweekly.com/ink/02/50/a.php




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and&#8230;love that Pat.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.laweekly.com/ink/02/50/a.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.laweekly.com/ink/02/50/a.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
