<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anchors Aweigh!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:28:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vote On Paper</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34337</link>
		<dc:creator>Vote On Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34337</guid>
		<description>Katie Couric has the &quot;Mary Hart Effect&quot; on this household.  Would Jorge Ramos be a fit for CBS?  We live out of satellite range and have never seen him.



&quot;Consider this tantalizing fact: more New Yorkers get their news in Spanish from Jorge Ramos on &quot;Noticiero Univision&quot; than in English from Dan Rather on &quot;The CBS Evening News.&quot;



Louis Nevaer, Pacific News Service, October 13, 2004



&quot;Univision&#039;s Ramos is Rather-Brokaw-Jennings rolled into one, and a prolific author as well.&quot;



Newsday, January 20, 2004



One of &quot;The Ten Most Admired Latinos&quot;



Latino Leaders magazine. January 31, 2003



&quot;One of this country&#039;s highest rated network news anchors&quot;.



Nightline (ABC) March 2, 2001



&quot;Star newscaster of Hispanic TV. Hispanic TV&#039;s No 1 correspondent and key to a huge voting bloc.&quot;



The Wall Street Journal



&quot;The anchor for Univision&#039;s evening news, Jorge Ramos, he&#039;s actually bigger than Peter Jennings, Dan Rather and Tom Brokaw -- at least in Miami, Los Angeles and Houston, where his newscast consistently beats out all the other networks for the top ratings.&quot;



The Miami Herald


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie Couric has the &#8220;Mary Hart Effect&#8221; on this household.  Would Jorge Ramos be a fit for CBS?  We live out of satellite range and have never seen him.</p>
<p>&#8220;Consider this tantalizing fact: more New Yorkers get their news in Spanish from Jorge Ramos on &#8220;Noticiero Univision&#8221; than in English from Dan Rather on &#8220;The CBS Evening News.&#8221;</p>
<p>Louis Nevaer, Pacific News Service, October 13, 2004</p>
<p>&#8220;Univision&#8217;s Ramos is Rather-Brokaw-Jennings rolled into one, and a prolific author as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Newsday, January 20, 2004</p>
<p>One of &#8220;The Ten Most Admired Latinos&#8221;</p>
<p>Latino Leaders magazine. January 31, 2003</p>
<p>&#8220;One of this country&#8217;s highest rated network news anchors&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nightline (ABC) March 2, 2001</p>
<p>&#8220;Star newscaster of Hispanic TV. Hispanic TV&#8217;s No 1 correspondent and key to a huge voting bloc.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Wall Street Journal</p>
<p>&#8220;The anchor for Univision&#8217;s evening news, Jorge Ramos, he&#8217;s actually bigger than Peter Jennings, Dan Rather and Tom Brokaw &#8212; at least in Miami, Los Angeles and Houston, where his newscast consistently beats out all the other networks for the top ratings.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Miami Herald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rgvdh</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34336</link>
		<dc:creator>rgvdh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34336</guid>
		<description>Jon Stewart!



At least he admits when he&#039;s making stuff up....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart!</p>
<p>At least he admits when he&#8217;s making stuff up&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34335</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34335</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Ed, I rarely watch the TV &quot;news&quot; anymore so their choice of anchor is irrelevant. I switched off Brian Williams the first time I tuned him in after he said that supplies were &quot;trickling in&quot; from the US bunglers.  This, after our military had been there for at least 10 days pouring in rescue supplies.



I did watch 60 Minutes last night, thinking that the election is over and it would be safe, and was astonished to see a segment on G from Baghdad as a reporter embedded with the terrorists in Iraq!  I would have had him arrested.  Sickening.



CBS News, Katie or no Katie--they&#039;re down for the count.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Ed, I rarely watch the TV &#8220;news&#8221; anymore so their choice of anchor is irrelevant. I switched off Brian Williams the first time I tuned him in after he said that supplies were &#8220;trickling in&#8221; from the US bunglers.  This, after our military had been there for at least 10 days pouring in rescue supplies.</p>
<p>I did watch 60 Minutes last night, thinking that the election is over and it would be safe, and was astonished to see a segment on G from Baghdad as a reporter embedded with the terrorists in Iraq!  I would have had him arrested.  Sickening.</p>
<p>CBS News, Katie or no Katie&#8211;they&#8217;re down for the count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photoncourier.blogspot.com</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34334</link>
		<dc:creator>photoncourier.blogspot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34334</guid>
		<description>I agree that GE/NBC does a better news job than the other two networks....but I don&#039;t think we&#039;ve seen the same level of creativity from the news business at NBC that we&#039;ve seen from other NBC businesses.



It would be fun if Immelt would bring in somebody from a totally different business, like locomotive, medical, or appliance, to run NBC News. Might get some very different approaches to things.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that GE/NBC does a better news job than the other two networks&#8230;.but I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ve seen the same level of creativity from the news business at NBC that we&#8217;ve seen from other NBC businesses.</p>
<p>It would be fun if Immelt would bring in somebody from a totally different business, like locomotive, medical, or appliance, to run NBC News. Might get some very different approaches to things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34333</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 05:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34333</guid>
		<description>Rogers right. Lets open up the anchor coffin, pound that stake in, and be done with it. Oh, and lots of sunshine to get rid of the stink. Better that way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rogers right. Lets open up the anchor coffin, pound that stake in, and be done with it. Oh, and lots of sunshine to get rid of the stink. Better that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedrury</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34332</link>
		<dc:creator>jedrury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 03:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34332</guid>
		<description>PhotoCourier:



GE is a corporation more concerned about its shareholders than Viacom or Disney. You run the network like NBC is run; opinion reigns on its cable appendages(CNBC and MCNBC); clean up the network news by moderating its political edge

in a conservative country and a changing media environment, thus increasing viewers and ad rates; buy a movie operation to feed your productions and run a tight fiscal ship in Hollywood.



GE, the platinium card of American corporation, has a long tradition of making money for its shareholders and it is run by serious money people. It is not like Disney [which if

you read Jim Stewart&#039;s latest piece in the New Yorker] is run by a child and it is not Viacom which has a real corporate identity crisis.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PhotoCourier:</p>
<p>GE is a corporation more concerned about its shareholders than Viacom or Disney. You run the network like NBC is run; opinion reigns on its cable appendages(CNBC and MCNBC); clean up the network news by moderating its political edge</p>
<p>in a conservative country and a changing media environment, thus increasing viewers and ad rates; buy a movie operation to feed your productions and run a tight fiscal ship in Hollywood.</p>
<p>GE, the platinium card of American corporation, has a long tradition of making money for its shareholders and it is run by serious money people. It is not like Disney [which if</p>
<p>you read Jim Stewart's latest piece in the New Yorker] is run by a child and it is not Viacom which has a real corporate identity crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin P</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34331</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 01:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34331</guid>
		<description>Roger:



Katie would do just fine. She is very good at reading a teleprompter, when she is doing a serious story she will wear her glasses to give the appearence of gravitas, and she has a smooth delivery and a nice smile. The myth that you have to be a reporter, the Mapes scandall exposes this fact perfectly, and that these anchors are nothing but newsreaders and actors should not exclude Katie. Katie would be able to do what Dan, Peter, and Tom have done for years and the fact that she has a huge following and is a woman would help a floundering CBS. She could hardly do worse then Dan and there is no reason not to try her. Not that I would watch her, or any male replacement either, but I doubt that she uses anymore hairspray then the male newsreaders do.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger:</p>
<p>Katie would do just fine. She is very good at reading a teleprompter, when she is doing a serious story she will wear her glasses to give the appearence of gravitas, and she has a smooth delivery and a nice smile. The myth that you have to be a reporter, the Mapes scandall exposes this fact perfectly, and that these anchors are nothing but newsreaders and actors should not exclude Katie. Katie would be able to do what Dan, Peter, and Tom have done for years and the fact that she has a huge following and is a woman would help a floundering CBS. She could hardly do worse then Dan and there is no reason not to try her. Not that I would watch her, or any male replacement either, but I doubt that she uses anymore hairspray then the male newsreaders do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photoncourier.blogspot.com</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34330</link>
		<dc:creator>photoncourier.blogspot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34330</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to do the following business case study. Suppose you were running a network, and also suppose that (a)your objective was the well-being of your shareholders, and (b)you were not overly intimidated by your own employees. What would be the proper way to run the news function, both right now and in the future, to maximize objective (a)?




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to do the following business case study. Suppose you were running a network, and also suppose that (a)your objective was the well-being of your shareholders, and (b)you were not overly intimidated by your own employees. What would be the proper way to run the news function, both right now and in the future, to maximize objective (a)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard mcenroe</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34329</link>
		<dc:creator>richard mcenroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34329</guid>
		<description>JBR ó CBS doesn&#039;t broadcast its news in widescreen yet.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JBR ó CBS doesn&#8217;t broadcast its news in widescreen yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBR</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34328</link>
		<dc:creator>JBR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/16/anchors-aweigh/#comment-34328</guid>
		<description>I suggest Michael Moore-- ideologically he would be perfect.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest Michael Moore&#8211; ideologically he would be perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
