<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here Comes (not your father&#8217;s) Mr. Jordan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/here-comes-not-your-fathers-mr-jordan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/here-comes-not-your-fathers-mr-jordan/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:55:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fountainhead</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/here-comes-not-your-fathers-mr-jordan/#comment-36706</link>
		<dc:creator>fountainhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 03:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/here-comes-not-your-fathers-mr-jordan/#comment-36706</guid>
		<description>CNN never ceases to amaze.  Several of my colleagues (of a different ideological ilk than I)  have suggested that CNN is deliberately moving to the left as a way to counter FOX.  What?  Are you serious?  Moving to the left?  Let&#039;s not forget the recent comments by CNN&#039;s notorious founder comparing our commander-in-chief to Hitler.  CNN, a mere shadow of its former self, appears to be tumbling from laughable to frightening.  Even the network&#039;s so-called business program, Moneyline, has been hijacked by organized labor&#039;s favorite apologist, Lou Dobbs.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN never ceases to amaze.  Several of my colleagues (of a different ideological ilk than I)  have suggested that CNN is deliberately moving to the left as a way to counter FOX.  What?  Are you serious?  Moving to the left?  Let&#8217;s not forget the recent comments by CNN&#8217;s notorious founder comparing our commander-in-chief to Hitler.  CNN, a mere shadow of its former self, appears to be tumbling from laughable to frightening.  Even the network&#8217;s so-called business program, Moneyline, has been hijacked by organized labor&#8217;s favorite apologist, Lou Dobbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yehudit</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/here-comes-not-your-fathers-mr-jordan/#comment-36705</link>
		<dc:creator>Yehudit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/here-comes-not-your-fathers-mr-jordan/#comment-36705</guid>
		<description>Instapundit and LGF also got the email.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instapundit and LGF also got the email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin P</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/here-comes-not-your-fathers-mr-jordan/#comment-36704</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 22:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/here-comes-not-your-fathers-mr-jordan/#comment-36704</guid>
		<description>Roger:



I received the response from CNN and it made no sense. It says that his comments were taken out of context but it did not deny that he used the word targeted. It stated that the military apologized for the deaths of certain journalists but then tried to draw a distinction between the apology and collateral damage. The  way I understood it the army apologized for the accidental death of the journalists, not for assasinating them. I replied and asked them for a transcript.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger:</p>
<p>I received the response from CNN and it made no sense. It says that his comments were taken out of context but it did not deny that he used the word targeted. It stated that the military apologized for the deaths of certain journalists but then tried to draw a distinction between the apology and collateral damage. The  way I understood it the army apologized for the accidental death of the journalists, not for assasinating them. I replied and asked them for a transcript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
