Who knows, but the invaluable website Regime Change Iran is reporting:
There are reports of massive demonstrations in Iran following the Iranian win over Japan in an important soccer match in Tehran.
Pro-democracy forces have used such events in the past to demonstrate their hatred of the regime. Massive security forces have been mobilized around the country to keep the demonstrations from getting out of control.
Gary Metz, aka Doctor Zin, of RCI telephoned me that he is monitoring events inside Iran, which are fluid. I suggest checking back into his site during the day. I will be following this too. Here’s a report on the activities from the Iranian student movement. These events have been exaggerated in the past, but some day they won’t be.
PJM Home
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
9 Comments
1. Ron Wrght:UPDATE ON IRANIAN DEMONSTRATIONS:
From Regime Change Iran:
. . . Update on Protests
Reports are coming in of demonstrations taking place all over Iran (Tehran, Esfhan, Tabriz, Abadan, and others) against the regime, using the soccer victory over Japan as an excuse to go into the streets. The victory is an excuse for people to go into the streets. The people can claim the are celebrating their victory while those in their midst demonstrate against the regime.
Read More
Dr. Zin doesn’t think this is “the event” but is a precursor of bigger things to come.
I don’t think Dr. Zin went to bed last night and is probably running short on fuel. I’m sure he could use some support from the “Titans of the Blogos.”
Others may want to help him out and mirror his posts so his site doesn’t go down.
Mar 25, 2005 - 1:10 pm 2. Ron Wrght:Sorry dropped a word “NOT”:
Dr. Zin doesn’t think this is NOT “the event” but is a precursor of bigger things to come.
Mar 25, 2005 - 1:26 pm 3. John Moore ( Useful Fools ):Although I have my doubts about the ability of the people to overthrow the ayatollahs, it might happen.
Then we would be left with the following interesting situation:
1) A democratic (we hope) government of free people
2) An Iranian nuclear program and related IRBM program
My sources and reading tell me that the Persian people want to keep the nukes, even after they ditch the Ayatollahs.
Then what do we do?
Do sanctions work better against a free people? Can they remain free under those circumstances?
How about threats or actual attacks – what would their impact be.
We live “in interesting times.”
Mar 25, 2005 - 5:02 pm 4. FriarsTale:Sleep, Mr. Carter
the nightmare you wouldn’t face
may soon blow away
Mar 25, 2005 - 7:18 pm 5. alan:A free Iran with nukes certainly would make things interesting. I think the biggest problem with that is it would encourage more proliferation as arab countries would believe they should have them too.
Mar 25, 2005 - 8:41 pm 6. Ric Locke:A secular, democratic Iran — a “Persia” — with nuclear weapons wouldn’t bother me any more than France does. My anecdotal experience of expatriate Iranis says they’re no worse (and no better) than anyone else. It’s just the mullahs who worry me.
Regards,
Ric
Mar 25, 2005 - 9:40 pm 7. rosignol:Well, here’s the thing- Iran is a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and unlike France, they were not a nuclear power prior to signing. That basically means that Iran has given up it’s right to develop nuclear weapons.
Mar 26, 2005 - 2:16 am 8. Steve M:Thanks for that, rosignol. I’m sure that’s a big weight off all our minds.
Mar 26, 2005 - 2:37 am 9. byrd:I tend to agree with Ric. Stable democracies with nukes don’t disturb me. It’s other kinds of governments with nukes that do.
Which points the way to a larger issue–nuclear nonproliferation is ultimately doomed. Always was. Sooner or later, every country that wants nukes will have them and there’s nothing we can do about it.
What the treaty does do is buy us time, slow down the process, so that we can come up with a different, better plan.
Personally, I can think of no better plan than democracy promotion. Democracies don’t go to war with each other and they won’t fire nuclear weapons at each other.
Mar 26, 2005 - 8:19 am