Seems like the Lebanese opposition has won. Emile Lahoud and Syria’s lackey regime have been given the boot. From the Lebanon Daily Star:
BEIRUT: Lebanon’s anti-Syrian opposition looked set to win outright control of Parliament last night in the decisive final round of the country’s first elections free of Syrian control in almost 30 years. Early indications from North Lebanon showed the united list of Saad Hariri, the son of murdered former Premier Rafik Hariri, had won enough seats to secure a majority in Parliament for his united opposition grouping.
Leading opposition politician Boutros Harb said: “According to incomplete results, we are heading for a total victory.”
How will Hezbollah react?
PJM Home
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
6 Comments
1. Laurence Simon:Hrm… what will Hezbollah do?
Well, The Pope just had a blessing of the Roman Ferrari Club.
Who will bless the Beirut Carbombing Club before they take out Hariri?
Jun 20, 2005 - 5:37 am 2. Jamie Irons:Roger
How will Hezbollah react?
You have asked the critical question.
In the news in the past several weeks (forgive me for having no specific references) it seems to me I have read several times of the Bush administration’s having succumbed to the nonsensical idea that Hezbollah has a “political” wing that can be dealt with, as though any cash given to the “political” wing were somehow, unlike all the other money in the world, not fungible.
It is my expectation that Hezbollah, looking like a duck, quacking like a duck, and walking like a duck, will continue to act and react like exactly what it is, a…
terrorist organization!
Jamie Irons
Jun 20, 2005 - 6:03 am 3. ed:Hmmmm.
My two shekels? I think Hezbollah will try to instigate sectarian violence. But if these groups can stick together they’ll stare Hezbollah down. The thing people should remember is that Hezbollah isn’t the normal terrorist organization. Many of their members are openly Hezbollah, and aren’t hidden away.
They live and work in close proximity with everyone else. This isn’t going to be a situation where violence will take place and nobody will know who is responsible. Instead, after decades of operating in the open, Hezbollah is uniquely vulnerable to retribution. This is probably why they haven’t struck out already.
Jun 20, 2005 - 7:11 am 4. mrp:In the last two weeks, Coalition forces have conducted large-scale counter-insurgency operations in the vicinity of the Iraq-Syrian border. Operation Matador was quickly followed by Spear and Dagger .
That’s a lot of firepower revved up and ready to go on the Syrian border. No doubt Bashar is following the action closely.
It will also be interesting to see what happens after the Iranian presidential “election” runoff this week.
Jun 20, 2005 - 7:20 am 5. David Thomson:“How will Hezbollah react?”
And how will the Baathists of Syria react? Bashar Assadís government is in danger. A major political upheaval seems likely before the end of the year. I canít see how the Baathists can continue to dominate Syria. The recent events in Lebanon show them to be nothing more than a paper tiger.
Jun 20, 2005 - 7:31 am 6. Kyda Sylvester:How will Hezbollah react?
I’m tempted to say “badly”, but Ed has an excellent point and I concur.
I’m with you, Jamie, I didn’t like that one bit either (I didn’t like it when such distinctions were made with the IRA/Sein Fein). Everything is such a delicate balance over there, though, that I’m willing to go along for the moment.
Jun 20, 2005 - 11:01 am