Roger L. Simon

September 25th, 2005 1:36 pm

India Votes with US, on Iran

Some had predicted it would be otherwise, but India has thrown its considerable (and growing) weight behind the struggle to deny nucear weapons to the mullahs.

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

8 Comments

1. Kevin P:

Roger:

Do you think the thought of India being in the vicinity of two nuclear powers that have large populations who show a taste for Islamo Fascism had anything to do with their decision? It strikes me as common sense and a strong desire to survive rather then a suprising political move.

Kevin Peters

Sep 25, 2005 - 1:55 pm 2. madawaskan:

Here’s the operative paragraph which explains why it is a diplomatic coup for the US-

Its biggest diplomatic victory was to pressure India to make a choice between a new-found friend called the United States and traditional ally Iran. When the crucial hour came, India had to distance itself not just from Iran, but from Russia and China, with whom it works at a trilateral forum, and some of the fellow non-aligned nations who refused to be influenced by the US.

Now Venezuela being in favor of Iran having nuclear weapons-why am I not surprised?

btw-Someone tell Sheehan and Co. if America only invades for oil-why didn’t we go for the closer fields in Chavez Country?

Sep 25, 2005 - 2:09 pm 3. richard mcenroe:

How do you say HOO-IN in Hindu?

And WHY exactly, would Iran be India’s traditional ally?

Sep 25, 2005 - 2:22 pm 4. dougf:

The US accommodated the wish of the Europeans to give Iran one last chance to return to the negotiating table and abandon its suspected nuclear bomb programme.

Would this be the ‘last’ last chance or merely the latest last chance, soon to be followed by the ‘OK! Now we really mean it, no kidding around,’last’ chance?

What a JOKE. It’s nice that India voted against the PR interests of the Iranian terror-State, but frankly, it matters not a bit.

I’m sure that India had its own reasons for doing so and has communicated same to its business partners in Tehran. In this case it really is ALL ABOUT OIL(or Natural Gas, as the case may be).

And what if the UN, in an act of un-imaginable dedication, actually does sanction Iran ? What will happen ?

NOTHING.

It’s either WAR-WAR or it’s Nukes for all courtesy of the mullahs. They know it.We know it.India knows it. I,m betting on the mullahs.

This pathetic dance of the ‘diplomats’ is now not even unseemly; it’s merely tedious.

This is a hollow victory of verbiage. Soon enough India along with Russia,China & Europe will be pouring money and material into Iran in return for OIL.

And we still won’t even get a UN sanction out of the mess. Wonderful.

Sep 25, 2005 - 4:48 pm 5. madawaskan:

Looks like we might be learning a few things from India.

Link to photo

Sep 25, 2005 - 5:07 pm 6. thibaud:

The Indian Navy is first-rate. Won’t be easy overcoming decades of Soviet agitprop and centuries of resentment of anglo colonialism, but this is shaping up to be a far more important relationship for us than our relationships with either France or Germany.

Long past time we shifted our diplomatic attention and resources away from increasingly irrelevant Europe toward those two Asian powers that truly can help or hurt us: India and Russia. A pity that so much of our foreign policy elite remains Atlanticist and euro-centric to the core.

Sep 25, 2005 - 11:11 pm 7. richard mcenroe:

Thibaud — The USAF Air Force recently held some joint exercises with the Indian AF. The Eagle pilots came back VERY thoughtful…

Sep 26, 2005 - 5:49 pm 8. yenyumyum:

I think the India -US partnership is one of the most important evolving relationships. Both nations share & celebrate the democratic spirit & are very similar in terms of the importance given to freedom.

The nations face similar threats, however India is also economically at potential threat to the US due to similar strengths. you may check out http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2002587929_injaop28.html , hence managing India is important to the US & vice versa. I dont however think india would blindly toe the US line like many other nations . Regarding Iran i har written a post on it in my blog http://yensthoughts.blogspot.com/2005/10/iiranisraelindiaindependant-foreign.html You may like to hv a look at it.

Nov 5, 2005 - 8:58 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments:
 

Roger L Simon

Author Photo
The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media

Just Published

Blacklisting MyselfWith gratitude to the readers of this blog without whom my new -- and first non-fiction -- book would likely never have been written.

Simon's first non-fiction book - Blacklisting Myself: Memoir of a Hollywood Apostate in an Age of Terror - Pub. date: February 5, 2009

Archives

Books