… and too many of us listen:
Afterwards, as he was being led out of court, Saddam angrily ordered two jailers in armored vests not to hold his arms. He squabbled with them for a minute and shoved one of them hard in the shoulder, and then they let him walk out untouched.
As for why the trial was postponed today:
The judge, Rizgar Mohammed Amin, who is Kurdish, told Reuters the main reason for the adjournment was that between 30 and 40 witnesses, some of them relatives of the men killed, had been too frightened to show up and testify.
Is that the real or whole reason? I don’t know. But the possibility of it gives me the shivers.
PJM Home
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
8 Comments
1. dougf:As one who stands in the first rank of those who hold the media in complete disdain, might I just say that there are many words that I might have chosen to use to describe Saddam’s performance today.For example:
A.Truculent
B.Bombastic
C.Argumentative
D.Hectoring
So what did the denizens of media world choose— Defiant.
Frankly if the whole media appartus was beamed up by space aliens tomorrow, the world would be a vastly better place. They are beyond useless.
Where are Kang & Kordos when you really need them anyway?
Oct 19, 2005 - 12:10 pm 2. Terrye:Roger:
I heard it had something to do with scurity concerns. I also think they need to make sure the case is very tight, no way Saddam can blame someone else.
We should not get too judgmental with the Iraqis however, look at how hard it is to get people to testify against drug dealers in this country.
And the Batthists really are like the mafia. They will do what they have to in order to intmidate people.
Maybe they need a witness protection program.
Oct 19, 2005 - 12:13 pm 3. Terrye:dougf:
I have to agree, they serve no useful purpose.
Oct 19, 2005 - 12:14 pm 4. PJ:Leave it to the ITM brothers for a riveting account of Baghdadi reaction to the first day of trial.
http://iraqthemodel.blogspot.com/
Oct 19, 2005 - 12:14 pm 5. Peter G.:Mohammed at ITM sounds a lot less discouraged than I do about the 45 day trial delay. In fact he doesn’t sound discouraged at all.
Oct 19, 2005 - 12:45 pm 6. Curmudgeon:When they found him in that abandoned cesspool, they should have all used it for its original function, then filled it in.
Oct 19, 2005 - 1:04 pm 7. exmaple:“Is that the real or whole reason?”
The reason was, I thought, the defense asked for a continuance. Asked for 90 days, got 45. Would think most any court in the world would give one reasonable extention – diminishes the later complaint of not having enough time to prepare.
Oct 19, 2005 - 2:48 pm 8. JFarreast:Could someone please copy and paste or make a screen shot and email to me Iraq the Model and other Iraqi sites during the trial? Blogspot is blocked in my area and I am very interested. Thanks.
Oct 19, 2005 - 3:05 pm