<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The (Continuing) Trouble With Harry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:16:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/#comment-73193</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/#comment-73193</guid>
		<description>jedrury,

I believe you may be forwarding Roger&#039;s point.  When there is no news....they create it (or promote it).  Squeaky wheels and all that...

It doesn&#039;t bode well for trust, but it does get some instantaneous viewers and talk.  This translates into some curious on-lookers and therefore some ratings increases.  As mature product people know, the way to increase sales of old stock is to make it &quot;new&quot; again by generating industry talk.  It doesn&#039;t really matter if the talk is true, just that there IS talk to generate interest.  In an age of &quot;page-hits&quot; it doesn&#039;t surprise me that the MSM has resorted to the quick-hit method to generate sales.

This method of generating talk does absolutely nothing for generating trust, just sales.  Trust has been put aside as a poor business decision.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jedrury,</p>
<p>I believe you may be forwarding Roger&#8217;s point.  When there is no news&#8230;.they create it (or promote it).  Squeaky wheels and all that&#8230;</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t bode well for trust, but it does get some instantaneous viewers and talk.  This translates into some curious on-lookers and therefore some ratings increases.  As mature product people know, the way to increase sales of old stock is to make it &#8220;new&#8221; again by generating industry talk.  It doesn&#8217;t really matter if the talk is true, just that there IS talk to generate interest.  In an age of &#8220;page-hits&#8221; it doesn&#8217;t surprise me that the MSM has resorted to the quick-hit method to generate sales.</p>
<p>This method of generating talk does absolutely nothing for generating trust, just sales.  Trust has been put aside as a poor business decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedrury</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/#comment-73192</link>
		<dc:creator>jedrury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/#comment-73192</guid>
		<description>It must have been a slow news day for Wolf

Imagine his poor producer searching around for a
celeb on a slow news day and Wolf barking in his ear &quot;who do we have .... who the f***, do we have? I only have an hour!!!&quot;

&quot;Wolf,  calm down, calm down,  we can always do Harry,  his publicist called four days ago.
It&#039;s either Harry or Mike Farrell or Tim Robbins,  Michael Moore is too hot,  and,
Pat Leahy took his usual does of Sominex is
on the floor of the Senate speaking as usual!!!&quot;




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must have been a slow news day for Wolf</p>
<p>Imagine his poor producer searching around for a<br />
celeb on a slow news day and Wolf barking in his ear &#8220;who do we have &#8230;. who the f***, do we have? I only have an hour!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Wolf,  calm down, calm down,  we can always do Harry,  his publicist called four days ago.<br />
It&#8217;s either Harry or Mike Farrell or Tim Robbins,  Michael Moore is too hot,  and,<br />
Pat Leahy took his usual does of Sominex is<br />
on the floor of the Senate speaking as usual!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomson</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/#comment-73191</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/#comment-73191</guid>
		<description>God must love Karl Rove.  Fools like Harry Belafonte make his life so much easier.  Hillary Clinton was caught between a rock and a hard place by the famous singerís antics.  This is another reason why Iím convinced that Senator Clinton has little chance of being elected president.  Someone like Belafonte can always be counted on to embarrass her campaign.  This is less likely to happen to her Republican opponent.  What about an idiot like Pat Robertson?  Yes, he will say something stupid---but quickly apologize and shut up.  Belafonte simply keeps going.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God must love Karl Rove.  Fools like Harry Belafonte make his life so much easier.  Hillary Clinton was caught between a rock and a hard place by the famous singerís antics.  This is another reason why Iím convinced that Senator Clinton has little chance of being elected president.  Someone like Belafonte can always be counted on to embarrass her campaign.  This is less likely to happen to her Republican opponent.  What about an idiot like Pat Robertson?  Yes, he will say something stupid&#8212;but quickly apologize and shut up.  Belafonte simply keeps going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plainslow</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/#comment-73190</link>
		<dc:creator>Plainslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/#comment-73190</guid>
		<description>He needs to take some lessons from Bono, about how to get things done.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He needs to take some lessons from Bono, about how to get things done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy P</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/#comment-73189</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/01/24/the-continuing-trouble-with-harry/#comment-73189</guid>
		<description>--Homeland Security to the Gestapo.--

Pubbies weren&#039;t the ones who wanted the TSA to be federalized/unionized.

We wanted private companies.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211;Homeland Security to the Gestapo.&#8211;</p>
<p>Pubbies weren&#8217;t the ones who wanted the TSA to be federalized/unionized.</p>
<p>We wanted private companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
