Roger L. Simon

February 4th, 2006 9:21 am

To the Security Council we will go

The US dropped its oppostion to the Egyptian proposal that the Middle East be a nuclear-free zone (an obvious, but largely irrelevant, jab at Israel) and off Iran goes, kicking and screaming , to the Security Council. Well, in five weeks anyway. What does all this add up to? Not much, in the short run. In the long run, who knows?

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

8 Comments

1. Sandy P:

Hosni wants his son to rule Egypt.

There might not be an Egypt for his son to rule.

Feb 4, 2006 - 2:59 pm 2. quickrob:

Is LGF down (dos attack?) right now…? Anybody know? Just curious…

Feb 4, 2006 - 3:38 pm 3. newscaper:

FWIW, Belmont CLub seems to be down now too.

I bet Wretchard and Charles are under a DOS hackig attack right now, by you know who.

Feb 4, 2006 - 4:13 pm 4. lowandslow:

I bet Wretchard and Charles are under a DOS hackig attack right now, by you know who.

Who?

Feb 4, 2006 - 4:31 pm 5. Lem:

For now, with the exception of the irrelevant suspects, Chaves and Castro, everybody seems to agree that Iran should not be allowed in the Nuke club.

If we talk the big talk and fail to pass any resolutions with teeth, actual force behind unmet deadlines, then I believe we will embolden not only the Iranians but North Korea and Syria.

After the mostly unmeet expectations in Iraq and our apparent success on the WOT (measured by no further attacks on our homeland) I predict we will not have the political stomach to release the dogs of war one more time.

Sadly, the danger posed by a nuclear Iran is manifestly greater than that of Iraq. Our failure to act on Iran may end up costing us dearly.

Feb 4, 2006 - 4:40 pm 6. Chap:

In the long run?

I’m betting on “not much”.

Feb 4, 2006 - 9:28 pm 7. SDN:

“The US dropped its oppostion to the Egyptian proposal that the Middle East be a nuclear-free zone ”

Sure, that’s irrelevant…. until all the Arab governments, with the agreement of China and possibly Russia (I’m assuming that the Euro powers have gained a better understanding of Islamofascism) say “If you won’t enforce it on the evil Jooos, you can’t enforce it on us….” BAD MOVE, W!

Feb 5, 2006 - 4:50 am 8. Curmudgeon:

In the (probably not very) long run, either Iran will have nuclear weapons or it will have been attacked/invaded by the US and/or Israel. I’m leaning about 80% towards the first alternative.
There are effective steps short of war that can be taken, but they require essentially total cooperation by Europe and a lack of interference by China and Russia. Not going to happen.

Feb 5, 2006 - 10:59 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments:
 

Roger L Simon

Author Photo
The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media

Just Published

Blacklisting MyselfWith gratitude to the readers of this blog without whom my new -- and first non-fiction -- book would likely never have been written.

Simon's first non-fiction book - Blacklisting Myself: Memoir of a Hollywood Apostate in an Age of Terror - Pub. date: February 5, 2009

Archives

Books