<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mullah, Mullah on the Wall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:15:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Esbiem</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78200</link>
		<dc:creator>Esbiem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 13:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78200</guid>
		<description>I have read elsewhere that the letter to the President of the United States from the &quot;President&quot; of Iran is in itself a last ditch effort to turn the great satin around or he shall face the consequences, because a good Jihadist should always give his enemy an opportunity to convert prior to sawing his head off. After reading the letter it seems a likely scenario. I have commented on it in my blog with a photorial last Thursday,May 11.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read elsewhere that the letter to the President of the United States from the &#8220;President&#8221; of Iran is in itself a last ditch effort to turn the great satin around or he shall face the consequences, because a good Jihadist should always give his enemy an opportunity to convert prior to sawing his head off. After reading the letter it seems a likely scenario. I have commented on it in my blog with a photorial last Thursday,May 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cave Bear</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78199</link>
		<dc:creator>Cave Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 01:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78199</guid>
		<description>I was reading about this on another blog today, and someone made a rather (to me) cogent remark.  He said it was interesting to note that the very people that the Muslim terrorists want to kill the most are the ones who pretty consistently take their side in these matters, and even live in the US cities the terrorists would most like to destroy.  That is, places like New York, LA, Boston, San Francisco, and other bastions of politically correct leftist thought.

He went on to say that if New York disappeared, it would not adversely affect his or his family&#039;s life.  And the spooky part is, he&#039;s right.  The Islamoterrorists won&#039;t be targeting places like Des Moines, Tulsa, Jacksonville or Portland.  It will be the big coastal cities, where most of the anti-American BDS suffers live.

Hopefully this won&#039;t happen, but if it does, there would be a certain Homeric justice to it...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading about this on another blog today, and someone made a rather (to me) cogent remark.  He said it was interesting to note that the very people that the Muslim terrorists want to kill the most are the ones who pretty consistently take their side in these matters, and even live in the US cities the terrorists would most like to destroy.  That is, places like New York, LA, Boston, San Francisco, and other bastions of politically correct leftist thought.</p>
<p>He went on to say that if New York disappeared, it would not adversely affect his or his family&#8217;s life.  And the spooky part is, he&#8217;s right.  The Islamoterrorists won&#8217;t be targeting places like Des Moines, Tulsa, Jacksonville or Portland.  It will be the big coastal cities, where most of the anti-American BDS suffers live.</p>
<p>Hopefully this won&#8217;t happen, but if it does, there would be a certain Homeric justice to it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photoncourier.blogspot.com</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78198</link>
		<dc:creator>photoncourier.blogspot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 22:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78198</guid>
		<description>&quot;I am amazed at the amount of anti-war and isolationist feeling in the US in the 30s&quot;...a lot of it was due to the vividly-reported horros of WWI, and to the feeling that that war had not really been necessary.

Here&#039;s a very interesting passage by Daniel Mannix, an American naval officer, about &lt;a href=&quot;http://photoncourier.blogspot.com/2005_08_01_photoncourier_archive.html#112502743037566856&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an experience he had in 1921&lt;/a&gt;. Sounds quite contemporary.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am amazed at the amount of anti-war and isolationist feeling in the US in the 30s&#8221;&#8230;a lot of it was due to the vividly-reported horros of WWI, and to the feeling that that war had not really been necessary.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a very interesting passage by Daniel Mannix, an American naval officer, about <a href="http://photoncourier.blogspot.com/2005_08_01_photoncourier_archive.html#112502743037566856" rel="nofollow">an experience he had in 1921</a>. Sounds quite contemporary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trainer</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78197</link>
		<dc:creator>trainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 15:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78197</guid>
		<description>Talks with Iran...Naaa.  But listening can&#039;t hurt...and publishing what you hear.

I believe that the Muslims hate each other as much as they hate the Great and Little Satan.  For our Iranian nutjob to become the next great leader is a bit far-fetched...He is a local phenomenon...unfortunately local to Israel.

I&#039;ve been reading auto and biographies of various US and English WWII personalities recently...Bradley, Patton, Ike, Monty, and several others.

I am amazed at the amount of anti-war and isolationist feeling in the US in the 30s...it dwarfs anything I saw in the 70s.  Leftists and appeasers abound...and this among the greatest generation.

Things haven&#039;t changed much.  And they won&#039;t change unless Iran does something really, really, stupid.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talks with Iran&#8230;Naaa.  But listening can&#8217;t hurt&#8230;and publishing what you hear.</p>
<p>I believe that the Muslims hate each other as much as they hate the Great and Little Satan.  For our Iranian nutjob to become the next great leader is a bit far-fetched&#8230;He is a local phenomenon&#8230;unfortunately local to Israel.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading auto and biographies of various US and English WWII personalities recently&#8230;Bradley, Patton, Ike, Monty, and several others.</p>
<p>I am amazed at the amount of anti-war and isolationist feeling in the US in the 30s&#8230;it dwarfs anything I saw in the 70s.  Leftists and appeasers abound&#8230;and this among the greatest generation.</p>
<p>Things haven&#8217;t changed much.  And they won&#8217;t change unless Iran does something really, really, stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78196</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 05:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78196</guid>
		<description>Bush and the United States are presently occupied elsewhere.

Leave it to England, France, and Germany, as at least the first two are UNSC permanent members, and all three are in the more immediate line of fire of any attempts by Iran to use any possible weapons that might come into existence.

Meanwhile, all the talk of &quot;wiping off the face of the earth&quot; can procede in blissful ignorance.  I mean, these fission devices are big, but are hardly nation killers.  It would take at least dozens to come close to nation killing results.

So the Shia Iran should proceed carefully when they take the advice of the Sunnis in Pakistan to target Israel if attack &quot;by anyone.&quot;  Iran is setting itself up for the biggest &quot;sucker punch&quot; in history (i.e. Sunnis secretly &quot;attack&quot; Iran, Iran attacks Israel, the Israelis return the favor, the Sunnis have obliterated large portions both the Jews and the heretic Shia).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush and the United States are presently occupied elsewhere.</p>
<p>Leave it to England, France, and Germany, as at least the first two are UNSC permanent members, and all three are in the more immediate line of fire of any attempts by Iran to use any possible weapons that might come into existence.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, all the talk of &#8220;wiping off the face of the earth&#8221; can procede in blissful ignorance.  I mean, these fission devices are big, but are hardly nation killers.  It would take at least dozens to come close to nation killing results.</p>
<p>So the Shia Iran should proceed carefully when they take the advice of the Sunnis in Pakistan to target Israel if attack &#8220;by anyone.&#8221;  Iran is setting itself up for the biggest &#8220;sucker punch&#8221; in history (i.e. Sunnis secretly &#8220;attack&#8221; Iran, Iran attacks Israel, the Israelis return the favor, the Sunnis have obliterated large portions both the Jews and the heretic Shia).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godzilla</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78195</link>
		<dc:creator>Godzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 21:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78195</guid>
		<description>Commenting on the Iranians and the 18-page diatribe is tantamount to stepping into a pile of wet dung and following the streamers that fly off your shoes as you kick them clean. You never end up with the same pattern.

Aside from wondering if the England, France, and Germany feel slighted for not getting their own letters, I wonder about this:

A few weeks ago, I remember reading an article from a Jewish publication out of Israel that quoted some high level offical as saying that Iran poses an existential threat for Israel.

Now you really can&#039;t get more stark than that.

I also remember reading an article where a high-ranking Israeli official stated that the U.S. should be the one that acts militarily to nix Iran&#039;s threat.

Huh?

Israel is fully capable of defending herself.

Iran needs an ultimatum, and it should come from Israel.

What I hope is that Bush has given Israel the okay to do whatever it deems necessary, with the emphasis on &lt;b&gt;whatever&lt;/b&gt;.

I just don&#039;t know if Israel has the moral unity and courage to do what they need to to ensure their survival.

If they are going to rely on the U.S. to save them, than they are as good as dead, intellectually, if not physically yet.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commenting on the Iranians and the 18-page diatribe is tantamount to stepping into a pile of wet dung and following the streamers that fly off your shoes as you kick them clean. You never end up with the same pattern.</p>
<p>Aside from wondering if the England, France, and Germany feel slighted for not getting their own letters, I wonder about this:</p>
<p>A few weeks ago, I remember reading an article from a Jewish publication out of Israel that quoted some high level offical as saying that Iran poses an existential threat for Israel.</p>
<p>Now you really can&#8217;t get more stark than that.</p>
<p>I also remember reading an article where a high-ranking Israeli official stated that the U.S. should be the one that acts militarily to nix Iran&#8217;s threat.</p>
<p>Huh?</p>
<p>Israel is fully capable of defending herself.</p>
<p>Iran needs an ultimatum, and it should come from Israel.</p>
<p>What I hope is that Bush has given Israel the okay to do whatever it deems necessary, with the emphasis on <b>whatever</b>.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t know if Israel has the moral unity and courage to do what they need to to ensure their survival.</p>
<p>If they are going to rely on the U.S. to save them, than they are as good as dead, intellectually, if not physically yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Peters</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78194</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 17:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78194</guid>
		<description>jabba:

Your mistake is that you expect the Bush critics to be consistent. If Bush tries multilateral approaches, they will demand unilateral talks. If Bush tries unilateral approaches they will call him a cowboy who is trying to undercut the U.N. They will even suggest Multilateral and unilateral at the same time. And the Iranians know that they will particpate, walk away, particpate. walk away, participate, walk away in an endless loop. U.N. IAEA, E.U.,whatever method is used and the critics will never say, &quot;Hmmm, maybe Iran simply wants their bombs and no matter what form of negotiations we use they will always walk away until they get the bomb. Naah, the Mullahs are basically good and reasonable people, it must be how we are talking to them, they really have no desire to join the nuclear club, what they say and do isn&#039;t a  accurate view of what they want, what we fantasize is what they want to do.&quot; Escape reality through delusion, it&#039;s almost as good as mind altering drugs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jabba:</p>
<p>Your mistake is that you expect the Bush critics to be consistent. If Bush tries multilateral approaches, they will demand unilateral talks. If Bush tries unilateral approaches they will call him a cowboy who is trying to undercut the U.N. They will even suggest Multilateral and unilateral at the same time. And the Iranians know that they will particpate, walk away, particpate. walk away, participate, walk away in an endless loop. U.N. IAEA, E.U.,whatever method is used and the critics will never say, &#8220;Hmmm, maybe Iran simply wants their bombs and no matter what form of negotiations we use they will always walk away until they get the bomb. Naah, the Mullahs are basically good and reasonable people, it must be how we are talking to them, they really have no desire to join the nuclear club, what they say and do isn&#8217;t a  accurate view of what they want, what we fantasize is what they want to do.&#8221; Escape reality through delusion, it&#8217;s almost as good as mind altering drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jabba the Tutt</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78193</link>
		<dc:creator>Jabba the Tutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 17:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78193</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t US talks with Iran be a huge dis to the EU Three talking with the Persian Moonbats?  Wouldn&#039;t US talks with Iran be a huge leap forward for Unilateralism?  Wouldn&#039;t US talks with Iran be a huge slap in the face to the UN and the UN Security Council and the IAEA?  Are the same people saying the US should talk to Iran the same people who demand the US set its policy by what the EU, the UN,  the UN Security Concil and the IAEA say?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t US talks with Iran be a huge dis to the EU Three talking with the Persian Moonbats?  Wouldn&#8217;t US talks with Iran be a huge leap forward for Unilateralism?  Wouldn&#8217;t US talks with Iran be a huge slap in the face to the UN and the UN Security Council and the IAEA?  Are the same people saying the US should talk to Iran the same people who demand the US set its policy by what the EU, the UN,  the UN Security Concil and the IAEA say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photoncourier.blogspot.com</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78192</link>
		<dc:creator>photoncourier.blogspot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 14:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78192</guid>
		<description>From Ralph Peters: &quot;One of the most consistently disheartening experiences an adult can have today is to listen to the endless attempts by our intellectuals and intelligence professionals to explain religious terrorism in clinical terms, assigning rational motives to men who have moved irrevocably beyond reason. We suffer under layers of intellectual asymmetries that hinder us from an intuititive recognition of our enemies.&quot;

and from Paul Reynaud, who became Prime Minister of France just before the German invasion of 1940: &quot;People think Hitler is like Kaiser Wilhelm. The old gentleman only wanted to take Alsace-Lorraine from us. But Hitler is Genghis Khan.&quot; (approximate quote)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Ralph Peters: &#8220;One of the most consistently disheartening experiences an adult can have today is to listen to the endless attempts by our intellectuals and intelligence professionals to explain religious terrorism in clinical terms, assigning rational motives to men who have moved irrevocably beyond reason. We suffer under layers of intellectual asymmetries that hinder us from an intuititive recognition of our enemies.&#8221;</p>
<p>and from Paul Reynaud, who became Prime Minister of France just before the German invasion of 1940: &#8220;People think Hitler is like Kaiser Wilhelm. The old gentleman only wanted to take Alsace-Lorraine from us. But Hitler is Genghis Khan.&#8221; (approximate quote)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Razak</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78191</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Razak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 04:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/12/mullah-mullah-on-the-wall/#comment-78191</guid>
		<description>MY supports talks with Iran because he is of the Left.  Leftists only differ over how much they despise America.  At some level, MY, to be true to his leftist beliefs, must believe that Iran is reacting to America`s evil.  He doesn`t want to be tough because in his heart he doesn`t believe that Iran is the problem.  Faith which does not act is not sincere.  The Left doesn`t view Iran as a threat; it views America as the threat.  The EU, Russia, and China are not stupid they are merely playing for time.  If Russia and China viewed Iran as threat they would not have assisted Iran in her quest for the bomb.  The Left wants Iran to become a nuclear power, because by doing so it is a defeat for America. The same held true for Saddam Hussein.  The Left knows that oil is America`s Achilles` heel.  A radical anti-American regime that controls most of the world`s oil has the potential to bring America to her knees, to destroy her economy.  But America removed Hussein ending that hope.  That is the real reason why the Left was so enraged over Iraq, because up to that time Hussein was the only real hope that the Left had in its war against the U.S. and its seemly unstoppable economy.  So now the Left`s hope is on Iran.  Iran is arch-reactionary in its social policies but her unyielding, unrepentant hatred for America and everything American easily earns Iran the Left`s admiration. Noam Chomsky`s meeting in Lebanon with Hezbollah and his support of Iran signals the beginning of an overt alliance between the radical Left and radical Islam.  Does Chomsky really believe that Iran`s nuclear program exists because Iran feels threaten by Israel?

Unfortunately GWB`s gross ineptitude and incompetence in stating America`s case and in defending her actions to the American people and to the world has helped lead to this no-win situation.  If Bush ignores the letter the Left will claim that it is because he is not interested in peace; if he accepts the offer for negotiations their pre-ordained failure will be Bush`s fault because he was too inflexible; he was not really interested in peace.  The letter provides a perfect vehicle in which the U.S. can be blamed for any future Iranian aggression.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MY supports talks with Iran because he is of the Left.  Leftists only differ over how much they despise America.  At some level, MY, to be true to his leftist beliefs, must believe that Iran is reacting to America`s evil.  He doesn`t want to be tough because in his heart he doesn`t believe that Iran is the problem.  Faith which does not act is not sincere.  The Left doesn`t view Iran as a threat; it views America as the threat.  The EU, Russia, and China are not stupid they are merely playing for time.  If Russia and China viewed Iran as threat they would not have assisted Iran in her quest for the bomb.  The Left wants Iran to become a nuclear power, because by doing so it is a defeat for America. The same held true for Saddam Hussein.  The Left knows that oil is America`s Achilles` heel.  A radical anti-American regime that controls most of the world`s oil has the potential to bring America to her knees, to destroy her economy.  But America removed Hussein ending that hope.  That is the real reason why the Left was so enraged over Iraq, because up to that time Hussein was the only real hope that the Left had in its war against the U.S. and its seemly unstoppable economy.  So now the Left`s hope is on Iran.  Iran is arch-reactionary in its social policies but her unyielding, unrepentant hatred for America and everything American easily earns Iran the Left`s admiration. Noam Chomsky`s meeting in Lebanon with Hezbollah and his support of Iran signals the beginning of an overt alliance between the radical Left and radical Islam.  Does Chomsky really believe that Iran`s nuclear program exists because Iran feels threaten by Israel?</p>
<p>Unfortunately GWB`s gross ineptitude and incompetence in stating America`s case and in defending her actions to the American people and to the world has helped lead to this no-win situation.  If Bush ignores the letter the Left will claim that it is because he is not interested in peace; if he accepts the offer for negotiations their pre-ordained failure will be Bush`s fault because he was too inflexible; he was not really interested in peace.  The letter provides a perfect vehicle in which the U.S. can be blamed for any future Iranian aggression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
