The WSJ’s Daniel Henninger concludes his thought-provoking piece today “Bin Laden as Patrick Henry? Confusion reigns five years after September 11.“:
It is possible to sharpen the focus of this matter further. The critics of the anti-terror surveillance programs such as the NSA’s warrantless wiretaps give the impression that these efforts somehow violate principles laid down at the ratification of the Bill of Rights. The legal arguments, however, revolve around the requirements of Title III (establishing probable cause for electronic surveillance) and the FISA statute. Both laws, from the 1960s and ’70s, in part were a reaction to government wiretapping of individuals involved in the civil-rights movement and anti-Vietnam War protests.Many of those in the opposition on these surveillance issues–in Congress, the legal community and the press–are people whose personal and intellectual formation is rooted in the events of that era. This is the prism through which they transmute any political event; does it pass or fail the commandments carved in the ’70s? But this is 2006, not 1974. Islamic jihad and al Qaeda are not the Montgomery marchers or Kent State, and our debate and laws should reflect that. Applying transaction analytics to telephone traffic is not the same as two cops with headphones in a hotel listening to the people in the next room.
Perhaps there’s a silver lining. The public demonizing of Messrs. Bush, Cheney and Gonzales as ruthless tramplers of civil liberties is a throwback to the anti-LBJ, anti-Nixon style of Vietnam-era protests. This has been catastrophic for shaping public policy around this issue. But if the bad guys go slow because they think that George Bush and Dick Cheney are RoboCops willing to do what they gotta do track, trap and catch them, hey, maybe our crackpot “system” works after all.
Maybe. But the RoboCops are only in office until 2008 and the bad guys are operating on a time scheme very different from ours. I’m not so sanguine as Mr. Henninger (and I wonder if he’s so sanguine himself).
PJM Home
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
2 Comments
1. David Thomson:Earth to Dan Henninger: our ìcrackpot “system” doesn’t always work after all. The constant attacks on the Bush administration only emboldens the terrorists. I am convinced that a large number of our troops have been killed in Iraq due to the press coverage of Americaís MSM. The North Vietnam Communists manipulated our very own leftist dominated institutions against us. In 2006 we are observing the Islamic nihilists employing the same game plan.
Jun 30, 2006 - 9:13 am 2. Sandy P:Frogistan and Turkey should also be included.
We weren’t where we were supposed to be in the initial attack.
Jun 30, 2006 - 11:39 am