Of course, M. Douste-Blazy, the most dangerous terror sponsors in the world are a “stabilizing force.” How impressively intellectually deep and nuanced an observation. Only someone from the loftiest heights of the international intelligentsia could have such a profound realization. You are “geeving a ceegarette to a babee,” and we are all so very impressed. Perfect perversity, Black is white. Evil is good. You, the elite, can see that where we are blind.

This is an example of how the global Left sides with groups like Hezbollah. Why? Anti-semitism? Anti-Americanism? Anti-Westernism? Poststructuralist relativism? Yes to all, but mainly because of the rule of perfect perversity. If it is bleedingly obviously wrong, evil even, then of course you must support and encourage it. Praise it.Only cowboys think otherwise.

Don’t be too hard on M. Douste-Blazy. He cannot help it. He puts the “duh” in dumb.

If the Europeans had treated their immigrant work horses with anything close to the melting pot mentality that is much more prevalent in the U.S., things likely would have turned out much differently. But they didn’t…they were [are still] too steeped in and limited by the woefully inaccurate self importance with which they regard themselves. (Forget about “a woman scorned”…it is a “former power” for which Hell hath no similar fury.) Their second class citizens have a right to be mightily pissed about it. Not that I support what they’d do if given a chance, but I understand some of that rage.

The other reason why your fear will never be realized is that Muslims are breeding 3 to every 1 indigenous European. Muslims don’t abort their replacements Westerners unfortunately do. It will be impossible for the ‘European street’ to rise up to defend itself.

Another reason why the short-sighted abortionist movement is leading the cause of Western suicide.

What I fear is most likely is that the European elite will go to ever greater lengths to prostrate Europe before the Islamo-fascist Jihadi movements right up until the moment that the “European street” decides it has had too much, and responds sharply and violently. Europe is not a melting pot, Islamic immigrants don’t fit into European society very well (partly because they haven’t been allowed to) it would be all too easy, and all too enticing, to round them up and throw them out, or worse.

It would certainly not be the first, or second or third, time that Europe would have done something of that sort.

Your question presumes a Chiracian rationality and good sense.

A highly dubious proposition.