You can be sure I won’t be seeing Dreamgirls again on New Year’s Eve. [I told you to stop reviewing. You'll never work in Hollywood again.-ed. Not with anyone connected with Dreamgirls.]
Roger L. Simon
Blacklisting Myself Memoir of a Hollywood Apostate in the Age of Terror
BUY HERE IN HARDCOVER- BUY HERE ON KINDLE! New radio: Fred Thompson Show, Hugh Hewitt on PJTV (first of five-parter). YouTube version of Roger on BookTV (After Words) with Armstrong Williams - here. Video: Roger on Greg Gutfeld's Red Eye. Reviews so far: Lloyd Billingsley @ FrontPage, Ron Radosh in the National Review, Sonny Bunch in the Washington Times, Andrew Klavan in City Journal, Marty Dodge in Blogcritics, Tod Goldberg in LV City Life, John Hinderaker in Powerline. Lone Star Times, Mark Coffey at Informed Speculation, John Ruberry at Marathon Pundit, Dan Blatt at Gay Patriot. First syndication Commentary. Advance comments from Michael Barone, John Podhoretz and Ron Silver. Podcasts: Milt Rosenberg Show, John J. Miller - National Review, Ed Driscoll - Sirius Radio. Video review by Bernard Chapin. FrontPage Interview w/ Jamie Glazov. Join the Facebook group. BUY HARDCOVER! - BUY KINDLE!





PJM Home




Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
9 Comments
1. LTEC:In your review you blame the “studio development system”. It is interesting to note, however, that in most cases where film makers are given total artistic freedom independent of the “system”, the result is panned by the same critics who are always complaining about the “system”. An interesting recent case is “Lady in the Water”. Almost all the reviewers complained about the producer/director’s arrogance in ignoring all the warnings he was given by numerous studio executives, and going off on his own.
Dec 31, 2006 - 11:55 am 2. Roger:Good point, LTEC. These things cut both ways. In the case of Dreamgirls, however … a story that has been around a loooooong time … I suspect, from my own experiences, that the development people are in part responsible. Too much opportunity, etc. But of course I don’t know. That’s why I wrote “whatever the case”
Dec 31, 2006 - 11:59 am 3. neo-neocon:I went to see “Dreamgirls” with low expectations, and so I had fun watching it. But I agree with you totally about the plot, the length, and absolutely about the music–inferior to the originals in every way.
But when I wrote my review of the movie, you’ll be happy to see (and hear) that I put the “Baby Love”–and the supremely superior Supremes–back in “Dreamgirls.” Follow the links to the videos and enjoy.
And a very Happy New Year to you all!
Dec 31, 2006 - 1:52 pm 4. Sissy Willis:Happy New Year to Roger and his loved loves. How fun to have worked as a member of PJM this year. Onward and upward!!!
Dec 31, 2006 - 2:44 pm 5. Patrick Tyson:This year on the last day of the year Dreamgirls is in theaters. Last year on this date Rent and The Producers were in theaters. The year before on this date The Phantom of the Opera was in theaters. Why? The year before the year before the year before on this date Chicago was in theaters.
Whether Dreamgirls, the stage musical version of which debuted on Broadway over 25 years ago, makes money or not, movie versions of other stage musicals will probably turn up in December for at least a few more years and maybe even in January for another few after that. And then, some years from now, or maybe just a year from now, some guy will have an idea and will find someone with money to finance putting that idea on film and the result might just be something akin to Moulin Rouge! and its box office and then people with movie rights to material from another medium might get people with money to finance putting that material onto film because, just maybe, that might be what’ll get the public into the movie theaters.
…and so it goes.
Dec 31, 2006 - 3:04 pm 6. Buddy Larsen:I sure miss the annual Coen Brothers film.
Dec 31, 2006 - 5:13 pm 7. heather:A couple of days ago, I had a wonderful time watching “Singing in the Rain” on vhs, and now I think I’ll buy some more Donald OConnor movies.
And.. would you believe… not only is the original “Francis the Talking Mule” really good, BUT, there, in a tiny tiny role was… Tony Curtis!
Dec 31, 2006 - 6:03 pm 8. Marathon Pundit:Happy New Year, Roger.
Dec 31, 2006 - 7:25 pm 9. jonathan riley:Happy new year to you all.
Jan 1, 2007 - 5:47 am