Comments on: Happy New Year to All!

By: jonathan riley

jonathan riley — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:47:06 +0000

Happy new year to you all.

By: Marathon Pundit

Marathon Pundit — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:25:06 +0000

Happy New Year, Roger.

By: heather

heather — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:03:01 +0000

A couple of days ago, I had a wonderful time watching “Singing in the Rain” on vhs, and now I think I’ll buy some more Donald OConnor movies.

And.. would you believe… not only is the original “Francis the Talking Mule” really good, BUT, there, in a tiny tiny role was… Tony Curtis!

By: Buddy Larsen

Buddy Larsen — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:13:55 +0000

I sure miss the annual Coen Brothers film.

By: Patrick Tyson

Patrick Tyson — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:04:45 +0000

This year on the last day of the year Dreamgirls is in theaters. Last year on this date Rent and The Producers were in theaters. The year before on this date The Phantom of the Opera was in theaters. Why? The year before the year before the year before on this date Chicago was in theaters. Whether Dreamgirls, the stage musical version of which debuted on Broadway over 25 years ago, makes money or not, movie versions of other stage musicals will probably turn up in December for at least a few more years and maybe even in January for another few after that. And then, some years from now, or maybe just a year from now, some guy will have an idea and will find someone with money to finance putting that idea on film and the result might just be something akin to Moulin Rouge! and its box office and then people with movie rights to material from another medium might get people with money to finance putting that material onto film because, just maybe, that might be what'll get the public into the movie theaters. ...and so it goes.

By: Sissy Willis

Sissy Willis — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 21:44:30 +0000

Happy New Year to Roger and his loved loves. How fun to have worked as a member of PJM this year. Onward and upward!!!

By: neo-neocon

neo-neocon — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 20:52:04 +0000

I went to see “Dreamgirls” with low expectations, and so I had fun watching it. But I agree with you totally about the plot, the length, and absolutely about the music–inferior to the originals in every way.

But when I wrote my review of the movie, you’ll be happy to see (and hear) that I put the “Baby Love”–and the supremely superior Supremes–back in “Dreamgirls.” Follow the links to the videos and enjoy.

And a very Happy New Year to you all!

By: Roger

Roger — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:59:33 +0000

Good point, LTEC. These things cut both ways. In the case of Dreamgirls, however … a story that has been around a loooooong time … I suspect, from my own experiences, that the development people are in part responsible. Too much opportunity, etc. But of course I don’t know. That’s why I wrote “whatever the case”

By: LTEC

LTEC — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:55:04 +0000

In your review you blame the “studio development system”. It is interesting to note, however, that in most cases where film makers are given total artistic freedom independent of the “system”, the result is panned by the same critics who are always complaining about the “system”. An interesting recent case is “Lady in the Water”. Almost all the reviewers complained about the producer/director’s arrogance in ignoring all the warnings he was given by numerous studio executives, and going off on his own.