Last week I had a lot of bad things to say about Paul Wolfowitz. Now I am not so sure. Evidently World Bank officials are cool to requests by W’s new attorney Robert Bennett to lay out the case for the embattled bank president. I don’t have any inside information on this, but I am becoming increasingly suspicious that the real issue here is not Wolfowitz’s behavior toward his girl friend, but far bigger fish – the Iraq War and, yet more importantly, Wolfowitz’s professed struggle against corruption among recipients of World Bank aid. This seems to me a genuinely good (and necessary) fight against a group of highly-entrenched (and often self-deceiving) adversaries. Was Wolfowitz fighting it well? I have no idea. But I would imagine it’s not easy. Indeed, this latest refusal even to hear his defense is an indication of just how hard it is.
UPDATE: Michael Totten pointed me to Christopher Hitchens’ eloquent defense of Wolfowitz and Riza, which appeared on Slate a few days ago.
PJM Home
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
15 Comments
1. jane m:This from davidsmediankritik site:
“Wall Street Journal’s Bret Stephens points to the apparent double standard employed by the European political elite in the Wolfowitz-Riza case:
A Tale of Two Scandals
“Full confidence” for an EU official despite a romp on a nude beach with an employee.
BY BRET STEPHENS Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Imagine that a top civil servant at a major multinational institution arranges a job for a fortysomething female colleague that comes with a $45,000 raise and brings her yearly salary to about $190,000, tax free. Now imagine that the couple has been photographed at a nudist beach–him wearing nothing but a baseball cap.
The latest sordid twist in l’affaire Wolfowitz? Not at all. This is the story of G
Apr 24, 2007 - 4:44 pm 2. jane m:Sorry, here’s the link for the aforementioned posting:
http://medienkritik.typepad.com/
Apr 24, 2007 - 4:47 pm 3. Terrye:If these people do not make an effort to deal with the corruption in organizations like the World Bank and the UN the American people might eventually get to the place where they just don’t want to support them anymore. I think that if the US leaves Iraq there might well follow a desire to leave other things as well. People are tired of the ingrates.
Apr 24, 2007 - 5:42 pm 4. jweaver:I am glad more are coming around to see Wolfowitz as the victim he is. It seems there are so many of these fine gentleman who are abused over their support for the war and past political battles with the left. Wolfowitz, much like Bolton deserves our praise and thanks.
Apr 24, 2007 - 6:07 pm 5. mrbill:Last I had read they new all about this ahead of time and approved of it. He has had this “friend” for over 6 years and I would think they were aware of it. It was not some office romance like Bills.
Im hearing its due to him holding some of these “members” feet to the fire on performing and doing what they say they are going to do.
Plus he has been getting results, which likely wont go over well in some of the despotic countries. They dont like the populace to have a life other than what they can control.
Apr 24, 2007 - 6:26 pm 6. aaron:Whenever Wolfowitz’s character and qualifications are questioned, I like to bring back the FULL transcript of the 2003 Vanity Fair interview.
Apr 24, 2007 - 6:53 pm 7. Barrett:The duplicity is stupifying. Is it not jane m?
It’s too bad that people do not investigate the facts before they make judgements. We have a tendency to believe the sound bite headlines, which are often not true. The MSM counts on the laziness of its audience. (I actually think Dan Rather thought he could get away unchallenged with his forged documents. Remember, he later said the charge was true even if the documents were false – the best of investigative reporting.)
Terrye, I am all for throwing the UN out of New York. The real estate could be put to better use.
You can’t say anything bad about a member nation so all you can do is reinforce the status quo, no matter how terrible. The UN was supposed to be a place where the diplomatic isolation of a wayward country would help bring it back into the fold without war. Darfur anyone?
It’s now the ultimate in poltical correctness – which illustrates what a PC world will get you.
Apr 24, 2007 - 8:53 pm 8. Sandy P:PC world, or a microcosm of the way the world is?
We are different. And that’s what drives them nuts.
As a counterpoint, over at Marginal Revolution, IIRC, is a post w/back up as to why Wolfie should go.
Apr 24, 2007 - 10:07 pm 9. Mikey:After the Oil for Food fiasco, I have this gut feeling that all of these organizations have serious corruption issues. It’s just too easy – approve the loan to The Most Glorious Tinhorn, President for Life of Kerblotzia and receive a nice thank-you note bearing the numbers for the Cayman Island account you wanted.
Seriously, are all of these international organizations created just to transfer US tax dollars to a series of thuggish dictaotrs and european bureaucrats?
Apr 25, 2007 - 6:41 am 10. Lem:Send me the money! I’ll spend it all in the uSA and its dependencies!
There is no smoking gun Fox points out, but the Wolf hunt continues. As the Gonzales & Rove matters prove
Apr 25, 2007 - 7:31 am 11. srlucado:The European media can’t help but bad-mouth any American conservative they can find.
That’s okay; it’s good practice for the day when their new Muslim masters order Eurocrats to denounce America–just before being beheaded.
Apr 25, 2007 - 8:21 am 12. Always right:Hard for me to imagine that Paul Wolfowitz (for that matter, other “Bushies”) went into his current job with both eyes shut.
How do they imagine that one guy alone can affect the wholesale changes needed to overhaul these dinasors (the same for John Bolton at his UN stint)? Yet if you (in this case, Wolfie) make changes at the personnel level, first thing the rest of us hear is “cronyism” with a capital c.
There’s gotta be some “Bush’s fault” somewhere. Or us Americans are just too naive.
Apr 25, 2007 - 9:54 am 13. Steven Mitchell:“If these people do not make an effort to deal with the corruption in organizations like the World Bank and the UN the American people might eventually get to the place where they just don’t want to support them anymore. ”
Man, I wish! I’ve been hoping for that since the late 70’s.
Apr 25, 2007 - 9:55 am 14. Lem:Is it me or is there lately a rash of people in the news worried to death about loosing their jobs?
From Rosie, Imus & Kaity to Gonzales, Wolfie & Rove.
Whatever happened to ? “take this job and shove it.”
Apr 25, 2007 - 12:30 pm 15. sigmund, carl and alfred:Seems to me this is a game of high stakes chicken.
The long knives have not appeared, and for good reason.
If Wolfowitz is forced out, he will sue. The World Bank does not want their dirty laundry and long history of corruption, aired.
Apr 25, 2007 - 1:33 pm