Comments on: PBS’ Big Lie

By: photoncourier.blogspot.com

photoncourier.blogspot.com — Sun, 06 May 2007 01:06:26 +0000

Luther McL…”I’m very well educated, I have learned from the best, and oh…I paid a lot of money for my education…I know Greek/Latin and the basic tenet’s of communism/socialism”

Actually, I seriously doubt that the typical PBS bureaucrat knows Greek/Latin. I suspect that many of these people have had a higher education which consists largely of “social studies” (in the grade school sense of the term), which is something quite different from a rigorous traditional humanities education.

By: Captain Hate

Captain Hate — Sat, 05 May 2007 15:33:10 +0000

Did anybody expect anything different from PBS, the cash playpen for useful fools like Bill Moyers and Tavis Smiley who could never succeed on a level playing field.

By: MarkD

MarkD — Fri, 04 May 2007 19:00:19 +0000

If I weren’t being taxed to pay for it, it would be PBS’s business.

Bias is expected. I suspect cowardice plays a large role as well.

By: Mike K

Mike K — Fri, 04 May 2007 18:09:57 +0000

The ACLU has been swung further left by their contributers and I still think PBS funding has some peculiar connections. The pressure behind PBS and NPR funding comes from groups like Moveon.org. This might be of interest.

By: promoguy

promoguy — Fri, 04 May 2007 04:31:01 +0000

Sandy P, good idea. I’m on my local’s list also.

And I’ll send it back in the postage paid envelope so it costs them a few pennies.

By: Sandy P

Sandy P — Fri, 04 May 2007 03:54:15 +0000

About the time this was going down, I received the fundraising letter for our local station.

Wrote in big red letters, “Islam vs. Islamists”

Cowards, Dhimmis.

I think they’ll get the message.

By: Barrett

Barrett — Fri, 04 May 2007 03:24:12 +0000

Roger, I concur. It is bias the PBS bureaucrats don’t like. (It’s just like Time magazine leaving GWB out of it’s list of most influential people.)

My question is why is the government in the television/broadcasting business at all?

There are plenty of alternatives out there today. We don’t need Uncle Sam’s PBS bureaucrats picking winners and losers. Futhermore, it’s our tax dollars being used to subsidize material that I, for one, often disagree with.

By: Luther McLeod

Luther McLeod — Fri, 04 May 2007 02:55:57 +0000

Actually I think it is beyond money, or grants, or stipends. It has reached the point beyond all that. It has all become very personal and political i.e… this is my life, I dare anyone to invalidate my existence and worth, I’m very well educated, I have learned from the best, and oh…I paid a lot of money for my education…I know Greek/Latin and the basic tenet’s of communism/socialism and to hell with all you plebes who cannot understand the greater good. But where’s my monthly check?

All rot of course. Communism should never have been recognized as a viable method of government. White guilt has driven most, if not all, of our current condition, I could expand, but think it not neccesary for those here. Delete if needed Roger.

By: Mike K

Mike K — Fri, 04 May 2007 00:13:56 +0000

It’s time to have a look at their funding. This has to be about money. The more they say, “It’s not about money….:

By: Anthony (Los Angeles)

Anthony (Los Angeles) — Thu, 03 May 2007 19:27:10 +0000

Bravo, Roger. WETA’s reasons all boil down to “you didn’t toe the line of the dominant left-liberal myth.” The West has no chance to win this war with Salafist Islam as long the “media elite” refuse to confront the truth about our enemy and their own flawed assumptions.