Michael Ledeen bitch slaps George Soros over the billionaire’s slapping by the mullahs.
But here’s a thought that came into my paranoid mystery writer’s brain …. What if it turns out after all these years that Soros himself was a CIA agent under deep, deep cover? I know it sounds crazy, but what else better explains the financier’s bizarre behavior and opinions – followed by the current arrest in Tehran? [You have gone off the deep end.-ed. With or without a diving board?]





PJM Home




Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
12 Comments
1. Buddy Larsen:okay okay, i get it i get it –but, izzat the GOOD CIA or the BAD CIA ???
May 23, 2007 - 2:36 pm 2. Lem:Roger you are in trouble my friend.
It’s plamely clear that you have outed a CIA undercover agent
You lucky Gonzales is busy not resigning.
May 23, 2007 - 2:39 pm 3. Buddy Larsen:Simon’d be done fer if Johnny RENO was still in town
May 23, 2007 - 2:59 pm 4. Webutante:A CIA agent with deep, deep ties to Halliburton. And zee plot thickens….
May 23, 2007 - 8:00 pm 5. Sgt. Mom:Myself, I’ve always thought that the CIA is itself a CIA plot!
That at the very center and heart of it is about half a dozen very shrewd, uber-competant, devious people who have perpetuated the stereotype of the bungling, officious, incompetent CIA as a cover. They have carried out this brilliantly devious plan for decades, in order to disarm suspicion!
Every news report about a bungled operation, or a disaffected and incompetant underling is a cover for a complex and sophisticated long-range plan…
It’s wierdly reassuring to think this… at least it gives credit for intelligence at an intellegence agency.
May 24, 2007 - 5:41 am 6. Roger:Sgt. Mom, I have had the exact same sort of reassuring thought myself. [That makes two delusional people. -ed. I guess.]
May 24, 2007 - 5:58 am 7. Sgt. Mom:Great minds think alike!!
May 24, 2007 - 6:10 am 8. Buddy Larsen:Sgt Mom, Roger, that’s what they want you think. The truth is, over that half-dozen hyper-geniuses, there’s three ludicrous incompetents. Hey, I used “ludicrous” without thinking of the rapper! Ahrg, no i didn’t
May 24, 2007 - 8:03 am 9. Sgt. Mom:But the three ludicrous incompetents are all part of the CIA’s CIA front! That’s what is so diabolical about this scheme! It’s the old Percy Blakeney “Scarlet Pimpernel” ploy on a grand institutional scale!
May 24, 2007 - 8:09 am 10. Buddy Larsen:So, the CIA is a “front” for…the CIA! Ahh…yes…now i’m starting to get it–
May 24, 2007 - 10:10 am 11. triticale::-\
C.I.A.
May 25, 2007 - 3:01 pm 12. Rarivette:Speaking as someone who was never in Afghanistan while the Soviets were experiencing their own turmoil, and with no direct information that Mr. Soros had anything to do with the downfall of the Soviet Union by supplying critical private funding for special non-existent projects, it would be an extreme surprise to find out he was actually conducting himself in a manner promoting disinformation all while secretly supporting administration goals. But this is not the case as we all must realize since he is his own man and would never cooperate with the destabilization of foreign governments. And anyone who implies Mr. Soros is indeed some kind of secret agent is fantasizing. I have never met, spoken with nor worked with the man in any capacity and cannot state anything about him one way or the other. And I doubt anyone in any intelligence position ever had contact with him at all either. Ever. There is question as to whether he even exists. Does that clear it up?
May 26, 2007 - 8:21 pm