If I had been Dan Rather – and been so humiliated for flagrantly lying on national television and then losing my job for it – I probably would have just gone away or tried to do some kind of penance to feel good about myself.
But then I’m not… obviously… Dan Rather.
Dan is back today to criticize Katie Couric for “dumbing down” the news – lying being, I suppose, intelligent. But never mind, Dan decries this new trend in “tarting up” news and opines that it is behind the declining ratings for CBS. No, Dan, what’s behind the declining ratings is that no one needs the evening news anymore, no matter who is delivering it. The evening news is pernicious. It assumes people are too stupid to go find the news themselves when they want it and must have it spoon fed to them by some pompous ass, male or female.
And now I must go because I vowed never to write another word about Dan Rather. Paris Hilton is more interesting – and more newsworthy.
PJM Home
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
7 Comments
1. scott:Yes,she start signing off “Courage” if she wants to sound smart.
Jun 12, 2007 - 1:29 pm 2. MikeD:Poor “Kenneth” still doesn’t have the frequency!
“Paris Hilton is more interesting – and more newsworthy.”
Brighter too.
Jun 12, 2007 - 1:49 pm 3. Lem:They tried to make me go to rehab, I said No, No, No.
Dan Rather
Jun 12, 2007 - 2:04 pm 4. Steven Mitchell:Roger, I want to congratulate you on being the first person to find a productive use of Paris Hilton, whom previously I have studiously and carefully ignored.
Jun 12, 2007 - 2:29 pm 5. navyone:Rather, Brokaw, Williams, Cronkite, Jennings, Rooney, Gibson et al, all painful to watch. I don’t need a guy with a newsy voice telling me how to view the world. That is why I go to blogs, many of them, in several languages. My generation will bury the network news, and the newspaper and the news magazine for that matter. It is not a revolution, that word is overused. Simply, they had a corner on the information market. Not anymore.
Jun 12, 2007 - 5:19 pm 6. jedrury:Roger and NavyOne:
You are right. Now, which network will be the first to dump the evening news.
The Washpo was recently lamenting the crash of local prime time news. If it bleeds, it leads journalism is dead. Advertisers fleeing.
Check out what Tony Blair said yesterday about the new “impact journalism” in Britain which has supplanted impact for truth. The weeping and crying from the Independent and Guardian were heard all over the net.
Remarkable what one smart, truthful, gutsy pol with a world cred can do as he walks off the stage. Instead of a Dick Nixon exit, he invents his own finale and leaves the wounded press lords reeling.
Jun 13, 2007 - 6:52 am 7. Hermie:Roger, the problem wasn’t that he was nationally humiliated and lost his job…CBS backed him up and whitewashed the fake documents fiasco.
Although we know better, he was allowed to leave without being raked over the coals by his employers. He still maintains his claims that the documents were legit because CBS would not admit he blew it big time due to his rabid anti-Bush bias. (CBS’ culture is anti-GOP, Anti-Bush, so Rather’s fake documents were considered a legitimate means of trying to sway the electorate.)
Being allowed to leave ‘with dignity’ is not always the right thing to do, especially when the person who has done wrong does not repent, and his enablers will not admit there was wrongdoing.
Jun 13, 2007 - 10:03 am