<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Republic &#8211; Only an Idiot Would Pay for This</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:36:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike K</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89082</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89082</guid>
		<description>I am reading the Cheney biography and the contrast between his life and the phony world of TNR is almost startling. I was a subscriber and sent gift subscriptions to my children for 25 years. I thought it was balanced although leaning left, as several of my children do. I think Foer decided on a new business plan to reverse the decline that had set in about the time I dropped it five years ago. He decided to pander to the nutroots, as the Beauchamp &quot;diaries&quot; and now the Petraeus smear, demonstrate. Look at the left wing blogs and you see the TNR theme. The trouble with that strategy is that the blogs are free and advertisers want eyeballs that are attached to people who might buy something. TNR is doomed.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am reading the Cheney biography and the contrast between his life and the phony world of TNR is almost startling. I was a subscriber and sent gift subscriptions to my children for 25 years. I thought it was balanced although leaning left, as several of my children do. I think Foer decided on a new business plan to reverse the decline that had set in about the time I dropped it five years ago. He decided to pander to the nutroots, as the Beauchamp &#8220;diaries&#8221; and now the Petraeus smear, demonstrate. Look at the left wing blogs and you see the TNR theme. The trouble with that strategy is that the blogs are free and advertisers want eyeballs that are attached to people who might buy something. TNR is doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lem</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89081</link>
		<dc:creator>Lem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89081</guid>
		<description>Here is Andrew Sullivan&#039;s defence of TNR as of last week.

&quot;Read TNR&#039;s accounting. It is as I predicted: honorable and, except for one small inaccuracy, it checks out. All the aspects aggressively challenged by the usual propaganda organs have been verified and corroborated. The military is now conducting its own investigation. Given the record of such formal investigations, I&#039;m not as confident in the Pentagon as I am in TNR. Can we now expect apologies from the people who smeared and maligned the magazine and its soldier-reporter? I doubt it. The attackers are not the kind to acknowledge their own errors.&quot;

Where is Sully now? on vacation of course.

This is just too good for words :)


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is Andrew Sullivan&#8217;s defence of TNR as of last week.</p>
<p>&#8220;Read TNR&#8217;s accounting. It is as I predicted: honorable and, except for one small inaccuracy, it checks out. All the aspects aggressively challenged by the usual propaganda organs have been verified and corroborated. The military is now conducting its own investigation. Given the record of such formal investigations, I&#8217;m not as confident in the Pentagon as I am in TNR. Can we now expect apologies from the people who smeared and maligned the magazine and its soldier-reporter? I doubt it. The attackers are not the kind to acknowledge their own errors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Where is Sully now? on vacation of course.</p>
<p>This is just too good for words <img src='http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cinabar</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89080</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinabar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89080</guid>
		<description>This is mystifying to me.

Instead of fighting (and losing) with the blogs, the MSM should utilize the blogsphere as an adjunct to their reporting.  They could continue to report with their usual limited fact checking then invite the blogs to comment and fact check on their behalf (for free no less).  If the facts pan out then the MSM can continue with a follow-up story.  If the facts cannot be confirmed the MSM can issue a retraction and thank the fact checkers for their diligence.  In turn, the MSM would gain credibility by using the blog experts as their own </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is mystifying to me.</p>
<p>Instead of fighting (and losing) with the blogs, the MSM should utilize the blogsphere as an adjunct to their reporting.  They could continue to report with their usual limited fact checking then invite the blogs to comment and fact check on their behalf (for free no less).  If the facts pan out then the MSM can continue with a follow-up story.  If the facts cannot be confirmed the MSM can issue a retraction and thank the fact checkers for their diligence.  In turn, the MSM would gain credibility by using the blog experts as their own</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedrury</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89079</link>
		<dc:creator>jedrury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89079</guid>
		<description>I agree with Roger. Watching the network news last night and on comes a story about the new wiretap legislation that the president - the lame duck president - &quot;rolled&quot; Reid and Pelosi on and to get a comment the segment reaches out for a comment from the ACLU; a young woman no more than five years out of law school.  Now, there is street cred, huh?

Catch the financials from the Times and other newspapers and read how their classified ad revenues are cascading. There is no money for green eye shade fact checkers.

Thanks to  Craigslist and others for their falling revs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Roger. Watching the network news last night and on comes a story about the new wiretap legislation that the president &#8211; the lame duck president &#8211; &#8220;rolled&#8221; Reid and Pelosi on and to get a comment the segment reaches out for a comment from the ACLU; a young woman no more than five years out of law school.  Now, there is street cred, huh?</p>
<p>Catch the financials from the Times and other newspapers and read how their classified ad revenues are cascading. There is no money for green eye shade fact checkers.</p>
<p>Thanks to  Craigslist and others for their falling revs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarryD</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89078</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89078</guid>
		<description>As Eric S. Raymond puts it &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus&#039;s_Law&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

Because blogs allow feedback (the comments section), the principal functions in the blogosphere.  Blogs that have a large and varied readership, not only get errors fixed quickly, but because some of the readers have subject matter expertise in the topic, the story can get additional research and leads.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Eric S. Raymond puts it <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus's_Law" rel="nofollow">&#8220;given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Because blogs allow feedback (the comments section), the principal functions in the blogosphere.  Blogs that have a large and varied readership, not only get errors fixed quickly, but because some of the readers have subject matter expertise in the topic, the story can get additional research and leads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insufficiently Sensitive</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89077</link>
		<dc:creator>Insufficiently Sensitive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89077</guid>
		<description>The mendacious yarns of &#039;Scott Thomas&#039; were plunked into the magazine without a thought of fact-checking.  It is as if Franklin Foer had found a surrogate in uniform to parrot his own  opinions about the beasts in the US military - why check, when the opinions are correct?  Foer cut his own throat by loudly claiming that the stories were confirmed, even in the face of plenty of contrary evidence.

Maybe TNR can reinvent itself as Red Star or some such heroic bastion of progressive truth.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mendacious yarns of &#8216;Scott Thomas&#8217; were plunked into the magazine without a thought of fact-checking.  It is as if Franklin Foer had found a surrogate in uniform to parrot his own  opinions about the beasts in the US military &#8211; why check, when the opinions are correct?  Foer cut his own throat by loudly claiming that the stories were confirmed, even in the face of plenty of contrary evidence.</p>
<p>Maybe TNR can reinvent itself as Red Star or some such heroic bastion of progressive truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim maguire</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89076</link>
		<dc:creator>tim maguire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89076</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m disappointed at how this is working out. I subscribed to TNR for several years and let it lapse not because I don&#039;t value them but because I don&#039;t have time to read them.

It&#039;s hard to find a liberal publication that displays much sense or fairness, and TNR was one of the rare ones that attempted some balance and honesty on partisan issues. But worse even than publishing Beauchamp, they defended the story when they had reason to believe it was not true and, as Ace detailed, they pulled a little bait and switch in the defense. That is unforgivable.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m disappointed at how this is working out. I subscribed to TNR for several years and let it lapse not because I don&#8217;t value them but because I don&#8217;t have time to read them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to find a liberal publication that displays much sense or fairness, and TNR was one of the rare ones that attempted some balance and honesty on partisan issues. But worse even than publishing Beauchamp, they defended the story when they had reason to believe it was not true and, as Ace detailed, they pulled a little bait and switch in the defense. That is unforgivable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lem</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89075</link>
		<dc:creator>Lem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89075</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just the MSM.

The spectacle of Barry Bonds &quot;breaking&quot; the all time home run record when evidence exist that he has cheated is disturbing to me.

There is got to be a way to make it right.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just the MSM.</p>
<p>The spectacle of Barry Bonds &#8220;breaking&#8221; the all time home run record when evidence exist that he has cheated is disturbing to me.</p>
<p>There is got to be a way to make it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Goodfellow</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89074</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Goodfellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 06:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/08/06/the-new-republic-only-an-idiot-would-pay-for-this/#comment-89074</guid>
		<description>Ironically the Weekly World News is shutting down.  Probably due to too much competition in the fake news arena I suspect.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically the Weekly World News is shutting down.  Probably due to too much competition in the fake news arena I suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
