<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Ron Paul peaked?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:51:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sparkie</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89777</link>
		<dc:creator>sparkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89777</guid>
		<description>I think Newt ought to continue speaking about conservative principles, without necessarily running  himself.

He is a good speaker with a strong grasp of many of the issues today, but he is unelectable, I believe.

The same thing ought to be done by other presidential aspirants, regardless of whether they win the nomination or not, they still ought to care enough about conservative victory in America that they continue speaking, but now supporting the primary winner and the general principles of conservatism.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Newt ought to continue speaking about conservative principles, without necessarily running  himself.</p>
<p>He is a good speaker with a strong grasp of many of the issues today, but he is unelectable, I believe.</p>
<p>The same thing ought to be done by other presidential aspirants, regardless of whether they win the nomination or not, they still ought to care enough about conservative victory in America that they continue speaking, but now supporting the primary winner and the general principles of conservatism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkD</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89776</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89776</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say the switch to Newt is the small government conservatives who were for Ron Paul on that issue only.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say the switch to Newt is the small government conservatives who were for Ron Paul on that issue only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy Larsen</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89775</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy Larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89775</guid>
		<description>Newt sure does have a good handle on the culture and the historical forces operating on it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt sure does have a good handle on the culture and the historical forces operating on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LouMinatti</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89774</link>
		<dc:creator>LouMinatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 02:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89774</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul is a punchline. He has little support, but the support he does have is annoyingly loud. It does seem very odd that so-called liberals are fond of Paul because he battles against the dreaded &quot;neocons&quot;. Do these people know that David Duke and the Stormfront people are also firmly in the Ron Paul camp?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul is a punchline. He has little support, but the support he does have is annoyingly loud. It does seem very odd that so-called liberals are fond of Paul because he battles against the dreaded &#8220;neocons&#8221;. Do these people know that David Duke and the Stormfront people are also firmly in the Ron Paul camp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomson</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89773</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89773</guid>
		<description>I am afraid that Newt Gingrich is bitter because he is no longer a top player in the political arena. Might he subconsciously wish to &quot;punish&quot; the GOP because of his second rate status? In back of Newt&#039;s mind, is he saying? &quot;If I can&#039;t have the presidency---then no Republican can have it!&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am afraid that Newt Gingrich is bitter because he is no longer a top player in the political arena. Might he subconsciously wish to &#8220;punish&#8221; the GOP because of his second rate status? In back of Newt&#8217;s mind, is he saying? &#8220;If I can&#8217;t have the presidency&#8212;then no Republican can have it!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Rosen</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89772</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89772</guid>
		<description>... and John Bolton for the other one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and John Bolton for the other one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Rosen</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89771</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89771</guid>
		<description>But David, I would love to see Newt take an important national security post (NSC or Sec. of State?) in the Giuliani administration.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But David, I would love to see Newt take an important national security post (NSC or Sec. of State?) in the Giuliani administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomson</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89770</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89770</guid>
		<description>I sense that Newt Gingrich can only cause damage.  He is wasting everyone&#039;s time.  He seems to be on an ego trip.  I doubt very much if Gingrich will ever poll above 4%.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sense that Newt Gingrich can only cause damage.  He is wasting everyone&#8217;s time.  He seems to be on an ego trip.  I doubt very much if Gingrich will ever poll above 4%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rinkuhero</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89769</link>
		<dc:creator>rinkuhero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/14/has-ron-paul-peaked/#comment-89769</guid>
		<description>Two things:

1) http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/articles/ron-paul-now-at-five-percent-new-hampshire.html

2) Remember the margin of error. These polls typically poll around 400 people, which gives them a margin of error of about 3% plus or minus.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things:</p>
<p>1) <a href="http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/articles/ron-paul-now-at-five-percent-new-hampshire.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/articles/ron-paul-now-at-five-percent-new-hampshire.html</a></p>
<p>2) Remember the margin of error. These polls typically poll around 400 people, which gives them a margin of error of about 3% plus or minus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
