It would normally be good news for conspiracy theorists that Oliver Stone is working on a George W. Bush biopic to appear before Bush leaves office (don’t hold your breath). But unfortunately the JFK director doesn’t seem to be swinging for his usual fences here, no Johnson behind the Kennedy assassination whispers or anything close: “Stone has said that the film, which will focus on the life and presidency of Bush, won’t be an anti-Bush polemic, but, as he told Daily Variety, ‘a fair, true portrait of the man. How did Bush go from being an alcoholic bum to the most powerful figure in the world?’”
How disappointing. Well, at least he’s calling Bush an “alcoholic bum” – not very PC, but we’ll let that go. It has some attitude of a Twelve Step sort. Look, we should admire Oliver for getting financing for his convoluted political biopics (Nixon?). He’s kind of a business genius.
PJM Home
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
14 Comments
1. Charlie (Colorado):*sigh*
I dunno, Roger. I kind of remember that he said JFK would be a balanced presentation, too. The question is, does he think the explanation involves Skull&Bones, the Trilateral Commission, Prescott Bush’s ties to the Nazis and, of course, the Joooos?
Too bad, too, because “how did Bush go from being an alcoholic bum to the most powerful figure in the world?” would be an interesting story. Writing a decent biography sounds like *way* too much work, but if someone did it, I’d buy it.
Mar 29, 2008 - 8:55 am 2. TerryeL:Gee, I dunno, how did Stone go from being a mentally ill druggie drop out to being a successful mentally ill Hollywood big shot?
Mar 29, 2008 - 9:06 am 3. Lightnin' Hopkins:Another fevered biographical “re-imagining” along the lines of “Nixon” and “The Doors” — “a fair, true portrait of the man” as seen through the eyes of a paranoid cokehead.
I’d rather spend those two hours of my life learning to riverdance or something equally annoying.
Mar 29, 2008 - 11:37 am 4. David Thomson:Oliver Stone’s “Nixon” was doomed to lose money. It was 212 minutes long! Common sense dictates that few people were going to endure such a long experience. Did the investors really give their approval to this extremely high risk undertaking? Were they even consulted? Are they so wealthy that their accountants said it didn’t matter if they lost money on this particular project?
Mar 29, 2008 - 2:22 pm 5. srlucado:An entire generation of filmgoers has grown up since Oliver Stone made a good movie. They barely care who George W. Bush is, let alone Oliver Stone.
Mar 29, 2008 - 7:20 pm 6. Mitch:1. Oliver Stone
2. George W. Bush
3. “A fair, true portrait of the man”
Pick any two.
Mar 29, 2008 - 9:27 pm 7. CT Tom:There are lots of right leaning traders on wall street who quote Gordon Gekko everyday. Bush can now be the Tony Montana or Gordon Gekko for a new generation.
Mar 30, 2008 - 6:00 am 8. rojac:Well, Stone may be a “mentally ill druggie drop out,” but he’s a “mentally ill druggie drop out” who went and fought for his country. Shame we can’t say the same for the president. Where was W during the Tet offensive?
And come to think of it– if a person joins the army, wins a bronze star, gets two purple hearts, graduates from NYU, and wins several acadamy awards…. um, how do you characterize that person as a “drop out”?
Words actually have meaning– that’s their purpose. I’m not an Oliver Stone apologist, nor do I think he is without faults– but I take umbrage at people who sling sloppy and meaningless insults at people. If you’re going to insult someone, try and actually write a decent sentence.
Mar 30, 2008 - 12:10 pm 9. Sally-O:To answer your question, when the Tet Offensive began, W was finishing his last year at Yale. At the time it ended, he was training as a fighter pilot.
And why do you take umbrage at people who sling sloppy and meaningless insults at people?
Mar 30, 2008 - 8:25 pm 10. Buddy Larsen:“…try and actually write a decent sentence” should be, ‘try to actually write a decent sentence’.
Mar 30, 2008 - 10:18 pm 11. Pat Patterson:Wow, deja vue all over again. I could swear Mr. Stone said something similar to “…a fair, true portrait of the man,” during the filming of Alexander. Then proceeded to put his Alexander, the munchkin sized Colin Farrell with a Courtney Love do, on Bucephalus and engage in a joust with an elephant. But I suppose that such fabrications are OK because they advance the story line.
Mar 31, 2008 - 8:39 am 12. Always right:Since when is it accepted that “history” (”biography” could be substituted here) is just as a movie (any movie) protrait it to be? The public won’t know an event or events happening unless they see it on the silverscreen (or TV screen)?
As for “biography” or “autobiography”, nowadays you have to know the author’s political leaning in advance in order to decide if it is worth any s*%#&.
Mar 31, 2008 - 9:10 am 13. Bacon-I Will Miss Thee:Shame we can’t say the same for the president. Where was W during the Tet offensive?
Why is that a shame or do you plan on voting for the only veteran this year? Have you voted for the veteran every year?
Perhaps Bush was hanging out with Obama and the Clintons during Tet, though we all know where Obama and the Clintons were at the time, don’t we?
Mar 31, 2008 - 9:35 pm 14. Buddy Larsen:If i could fly an F-102 Delta Dart all-weather high-altitude interceptor known as the ‘widowmaker’ for its dangerous personality, i’d feel like i could laugh at the president’s service, too.
Apr 1, 2008 - 3:42 pm