<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama: the Kissinger Blunder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:06:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ex-democrat</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99831</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99831</guid>
		<description>Roger - that video&#039;s been taken down - supposedly for copyright violation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger &#8211; that video&#8217;s been taken down &#8211; supposedly for copyright violation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Dreamer</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99682</link>
		<dc:creator>California Dreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99682</guid>
		<description>Perhaps this could be called progress since we are now fussing over whether the nominal corporate rate in Ireland is 11 or 12.5%, but we still need to note that the enterprise zone that has driven Ireland&#039;s growth has had a 10% rate for some time with the expected results.  And all of these rates are 1/3 of the US rate.

So now that Greenie has done his drive-by post with the Kossacks&#039; shallow talking points, will he be picking up the gauntlet to answer the basic question of how BO will improve the business climate in the US by raising the tax rate to be more &quot;fair&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this could be called progress since we are now fussing over whether the nominal corporate rate in Ireland is 11 or 12.5%, but we still need to note that the enterprise zone that has driven Ireland&#8217;s growth has had a 10% rate for some time with the expected results.  And all of these rates are 1/3 of the US rate.</p>
<p>So now that Greenie has done his drive-by post with the Kossacks&#8217; shallow talking points, will he be picking up the gauntlet to answer the basic question of how BO will improve the business climate in the US by raising the tax rate to be more &#8220;fair&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Dreamer</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99680</link>
		<dc:creator>California Dreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99680</guid>
		<description>We seem to be making some progress even if it is due to a drive-by post by some Kossack who can cut and paste.

At least we are now discussing whether the &quot;nominal&quot; corporate tax rate was misquoted at 11% instead of 12.5% with a big exception of 10% in the enterprise zone that has driven much of the growth in Ireland, especially in technology companies.  Both rates are about 1/3 of the US rate, but BO is not satisfied that the US rate is &quot;fair&quot;.

So will Greenie be picking up the gauntlet to answer the question that Edan has abandoned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We seem to be making some progress even if it is due to a drive-by post by some Kossack who can cut and paste.</p>
<p>At least we are now discussing whether the &#8220;nominal&#8221; corporate tax rate was misquoted at 11% instead of 12.5% with a big exception of 10% in the enterprise zone that has driven much of the growth in Ireland, especially in technology companies.  Both rates are about 1/3 of the US rate, but BO is not satisfied that the US rate is &#8220;fair&#8221;.</p>
<p>So will Greenie be picking up the gauntlet to answer the question that Edan has abandoned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greenie</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99667</link>
		<dc:creator>Greenie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99667</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure Roger really understands this one.  If you parse Dr. K&#039;s language, it&#039;s clear he&#039;s not disagreeing with BO.  Hitchens agrees here:  http://www.slate.com/id/2201140/.

Just to be fair, Roger, you might want to mention at McCain&#039;s gaffes (not that I think he&#039;s a sleazy liar or anything).  

He was wrong about his vote on the Marines in Lebanon (they were there before he got to Congress).

He was wrong about the nominal corporate tax rate in Ireland (it&#039;s higher).

He was wrong about Reagan&#039;s unconditional willingness to negotiate with Brezhnev (he was).

He was when he stated Pakistan was a failed state when Musharraf came to power (it wasn&#039;t).

He was wrong when he referred to the leader of Pakistan as &quot;Qadari&quot; instead of Asif Ali Zardari.

As for that video -- now that&#039;s sleazy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure Roger really understands this one.  If you parse Dr. K&#8217;s language, it&#8217;s clear he&#8217;s not disagreeing with BO.  Hitchens agrees here:  <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2201140/" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2201140/</a>.</p>
<p>Just to be fair, Roger, you might want to mention at McCain&#8217;s gaffes (not that I think he&#8217;s a sleazy liar or anything).  </p>
<p>He was wrong about his vote on the Marines in Lebanon (they were there before he got to Congress).</p>
<p>He was wrong about the nominal corporate tax rate in Ireland (it&#8217;s higher).</p>
<p>He was wrong about Reagan&#8217;s unconditional willingness to negotiate with Brezhnev (he was).</p>
<p>He was when he stated Pakistan was a failed state when Musharraf came to power (it wasn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>He was wrong when he referred to the leader of Pakistan as &#8220;Qadari&#8221; instead of Asif Ali Zardari.</p>
<p>As for that video &#8212; now that&#8217;s sleazy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edan Naud</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99661</link>
		<dc:creator>Edan Naud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99661</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry to be such a disappointment to you California Dreamer.  But as Mr. Rumsfeld said &quot;...you have to go to war with the army you have...&quot;  My interest is foreign policy and military history not economics, but you asked me to respond, so I did.  My mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to be such a disappointment to you California Dreamer.  But as Mr. Rumsfeld said &#8220;&#8230;you have to go to war with the army you have&#8230;&#8221;  My interest is foreign policy and military history not economics, but you asked me to respond, so I did.  My mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Dreamer</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99660</link>
		<dc:creator>California Dreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99660</guid>
		<description>So now you are going to switch to the argument that things aren&#039;t that bad under Bush and expect that I will switch in response?  You are truly hopeless.  I cannot have a battle of wits with an unarmed man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now you are going to switch to the argument that things aren&#8217;t that bad under Bush and expect that I will switch in response?  You are truly hopeless.  I cannot have a battle of wits with an unarmed man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edan Naud</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99659</link>
		<dc:creator>Edan Naud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99659</guid>
		<description>Please give me a number.  How many businesses have we lost under king george II&#039;s reign, and if you could give me a source for your info it would be helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please give me a number.  How many businesses have we lost under king george II&#8217;s reign, and if you could give me a source for your info it would be helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hermie</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99658</link>
		<dc:creator>hermie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99658</guid>
		<description>Also, Obama still has his claim that we will be energy self-sufficient in 10 years if we elect him.

Sorry Barry, but there is no way in 10 years that we&#039;ll be able to replace or convert every car, truck, plane ship, train, factory, etc, so that we won&#039;t need to import oil. Especially since you are again, saying that we don’t need to drill and you don&#039;t want nuclear; and your running mate says that there will be no coal plants built either. At least McCain knows that additional drilling is part of a transition to nuclear and alternatives. BTW, Obama didn’t have too much to say about Reid&#039;s attempt to block oil shale processing...another way to make ourselves energy self-sufficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Obama still has his claim that we will be energy self-sufficient in 10 years if we elect him.</p>
<p>Sorry Barry, but there is no way in 10 years that we&#8217;ll be able to replace or convert every car, truck, plane ship, train, factory, etc, so that we won&#8217;t need to import oil. Especially since you are again, saying that we don’t need to drill and you don&#8217;t want nuclear; and your running mate says that there will be no coal plants built either. At least McCain knows that additional drilling is part of a transition to nuclear and alternatives. BTW, Obama didn’t have too much to say about Reid&#8217;s attempt to block oil shale processing&#8230;another way to make ourselves energy self-sufficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Dreamer</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99656</link>
		<dc:creator>California Dreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99656</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t speak to the earlier Roger, but the current version makes a lot of sense here.

One more college try:  There was no mention of quality of life, Iraq or any other war in my original question, so please try to stay on point.

If business tax rates, labor costs, insurance costs or regulatory burdens are not the reason businesses are leaving the US, what is?  I hear BO whine about the losses often, but I never, ever hear him say what he would do to keep them.  All of his policies make the business environment worse!

His idea of helping businesses seems to be to use taxpayer money to crowd them out of the green technology, health insurance and other industries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t speak to the earlier Roger, but the current version makes a lot of sense here.</p>
<p>One more college try:  There was no mention of quality of life, Iraq or any other war in my original question, so please try to stay on point.</p>
<p>If business tax rates, labor costs, insurance costs or regulatory burdens are not the reason businesses are leaving the US, what is?  I hear BO whine about the losses often, but I never, ever hear him say what he would do to keep them.  All of his policies make the business environment worse!</p>
<p>His idea of helping businesses seems to be to use taxpayer money to crowd them out of the green technology, health insurance and other industries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edan Naud</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99655</link>
		<dc:creator>Edan Naud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/09/26/obama-the-kissinger-blunder/#comment-99655</guid>
		<description>Sorry California Dreamer I don&#039;t agree with your assessment.  You did what we should do in Iraq, declare victory and leave the field of combat.  What I had hoped to convey was the idea that tax rate doesn&#039;t equal companies staying or quality of life.  It is part of the equation but there are other things to consider.  On a side note my main reason for being here is I loved Roger Simon&#039;s early books and then I discovered this.  I not sure when the alien life forms took you all over but I don&#039;t think the early Roger Simon would recognize the later pod person Roger Simon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry California Dreamer I don&#8217;t agree with your assessment.  You did what we should do in Iraq, declare victory and leave the field of combat.  What I had hoped to convey was the idea that tax rate doesn&#8217;t equal companies staying or quality of life.  It is part of the equation but there are other things to consider.  On a side note my main reason for being here is I loved Roger Simon&#8217;s early books and then I discovered this.  I not sure when the alien life forms took you all over but I don&#8217;t think the early Roger Simon would recognize the later pod person Roger Simon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
