<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Debate: is it over yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:00:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barry Dauphin</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/#comment-100306</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Dauphin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4293#comment-100306</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The only question is: Is he lying now? Or has he been lying for the last 18 months?&lt;/i&gt;
The only thing is that assumes he actually has a plan rather than being an empty suit. What has he done in public life? Basically nothing except run for office. What are his successes? Winning public office. That&#039;s it. He will provide the flowery cover Dems need to push an agenda, an agenda that is not being discussed publicly. In an ironic way, the financial crisis might be the only thing to slow them down. If the Dems get 60 votes in the Senate, it will not be pretty (for our pocketbooks). The election of 2010 will be a corker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The only question is: Is he lying now? Or has he been lying for the last 18 months?</i><br />
The only thing is that assumes he actually has a plan rather than being an empty suit. What has he done in public life? Basically nothing except run for office. What are his successes? Winning public office. That&#8217;s it. He will provide the flowery cover Dems need to push an agenda, an agenda that is not being discussed publicly. In an ironic way, the financial crisis might be the only thing to slow them down. If the Dems get 60 votes in the Senate, it will not be pretty (for our pocketbooks). The election of 2010 will be a corker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeD</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/#comment-100305</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4293#comment-100305</guid>
		<description>&quot;We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it’s unacceptable. And I will do everything that’s required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table. And it is important that we don’t provide veto power to the United Nations or anyone else in acting in our interests. — Barack Obama 7-Oct-2008&quot;

The only question is: Is he lying now? Or has he been lying for the last 18 months?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it’s unacceptable. And I will do everything that’s required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table. And it is important that we don’t provide veto power to the United Nations or anyone else in acting in our interests. — Barack Obama 7-Oct-2008&#8243;</p>
<p>The only question is: Is he lying now? Or has he been lying for the last 18 months?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pettigrew for President</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/#comment-100304</link>
		<dc:creator>Pettigrew for President</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4293#comment-100304</guid>
		<description>So it begins.  See Dean Reynolds&#039; CBSNews column on travel with Obama.  MSM/press made Obama, but will tear him down when he&#039;s President because he didn&#039;t treat them as well as McCain.  He closes by writing, &quot;in politics, everything that goes around comes around.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it begins.  See Dean Reynolds&#8217; CBSNews column on travel with Obama.  MSM/press made Obama, but will tear him down when he&#8217;s President because he didn&#8217;t treat them as well as McCain.  He closes by writing, &#8220;in politics, everything that goes around comes around.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insufficiently Sensitive</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/#comment-100303</link>
		<dc:creator>Insufficiently Sensitive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4293#comment-100303</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It’s an entirely legitimate issue, but not a magic bullet. McCain could have brought Ayers up last night, but Obama would have given his stock reply and it wouldn’t have been the “game-changer” everyone’s looking for. &lt;/i&gt;

Good God, the association with Ayers by itself is trivial as far as the general public goes - they don&#039;t know who he is, and communism isn&#039;t the boogaboo it was thirty years ago.  

But McCain should forthrightly assert that Obama was brought onto the CAC board by one Bill Ayers, who had figured out how to game the Annenberg Foundation for enormous funds.  Annenberg wanted the money to improve Chicago education.  Obama doled it out instead to organizations of radicals who &#039;organized&#039; communities into ACORN-like groups for political gain, at the children&#039;s expense - piously bleating about &#039;the children&#039; as a smokescreen.  Obama should be taken to account for the self-admitted failure by the CAC to improve the learning of those kids, and should be made to answer why $150,000,000 was diverted from learning to political activists instead.  In the business world, that&#039;s fraud, and Obama still needs to answer for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s an entirely legitimate issue, but not a magic bullet. McCain could have brought Ayers up last night, but Obama would have given his stock reply and it wouldn’t have been the “game-changer” everyone’s looking for. </i></p>
<p>Good God, the association with Ayers by itself is trivial as far as the general public goes &#8211; they don&#8217;t know who he is, and communism isn&#8217;t the boogaboo it was thirty years ago.  </p>
<p>But McCain should forthrightly assert that Obama was brought onto the CAC board by one Bill Ayers, who had figured out how to game the Annenberg Foundation for enormous funds.  Annenberg wanted the money to improve Chicago education.  Obama doled it out instead to organizations of radicals who &#8216;organized&#8217; communities into ACORN-like groups for political gain, at the children&#8217;s expense &#8211; piously bleating about &#8216;the children&#8217; as a smokescreen.  Obama should be taken to account for the self-admitted failure by the CAC to improve the learning of those kids, and should be made to answer why $150,000,000 was diverted from learning to political activists instead.  In the business world, that&#8217;s fraud, and Obama still needs to answer for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmeyert4a</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/#comment-100302</link>
		<dc:creator>jmeyert4a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4293#comment-100302</guid>
		<description>&quot; Nor did he act like a man who really wanted the job. &quot;

That&#039;s IT! At this point, who would?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Nor did he act like a man who really wanted the job. &#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s IT! At this point, who would?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Dauphin</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/#comment-100301</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Dauphin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4293#comment-100301</guid>
		<description>Has anyone seen the David Brooks&#039; commnets about Palin being a cancer on the Republican Party? Silly stuff to be sure, but he&#039;s a &quot;conservative&quot; at NY Times. The NY elite cringes at the sight of Palin. David Remnick was absolutely NY provincial in that prissy way only he can muster (on Charlie Rose show). 

Circumstances might shift the dynamic of the election, and McCain has come back before, but the signs are not good here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone seen the David Brooks&#8217; commnets about Palin being a cancer on the Republican Party? Silly stuff to be sure, but he&#8217;s a &#8220;conservative&#8221; at NY Times. The NY elite cringes at the sight of Palin. David Remnick was absolutely NY provincial in that prissy way only he can muster (on Charlie Rose show). </p>
<p>Circumstances might shift the dynamic of the election, and McCain has come back before, but the signs are not good here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodger S.</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/#comment-100299</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodger S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4293#comment-100299</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true it&#039;s not over, but it isn&#039;t encouraging. 

I would rather my desire that McCain win be replaced with some confidence he has a fighting chance other than telling me how some people, apparently the sleepy ones that are too busy to have paid much if any attention up to this point, will give The One a second look...

... and be miraculously shaken to their boots to the point of voting for McCain.  

It&#039;s not my wits that are at issue, it is the sleepy one&#039;s wits. And a slow grinding down may not be enough to put people into shock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true it&#8217;s not over, but it isn&#8217;t encouraging. </p>
<p>I would rather my desire that McCain win be replaced with some confidence he has a fighting chance other than telling me how some people, apparently the sleepy ones that are too busy to have paid much if any attention up to this point, will give The One a second look&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; and be miraculously shaken to their boots to the point of voting for McCain.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not my wits that are at issue, it is the sleepy one&#8217;s wits. And a slow grinding down may not be enough to put people into shock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomson</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/#comment-100298</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4293#comment-100298</guid>
		<description>&quot;McCain could have brought Ayers up last night&quot;

He could have also mentioned Barney Frank.  The Massachusetts congressman should have been cited around three or four times.  Bill Ayers is not the only miscreant that threatens the Obama campaign!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;McCain could have brought Ayers up last night&#8221;</p>
<p>He could have also mentioned Barney Frank.  The Massachusetts congressman should have been cited around three or four times.  Bill Ayers is not the only miscreant that threatens the Obama campaign!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter G</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/#comment-100297</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4293#comment-100297</guid>
		<description>Rich Lowry in The Corner says what I&#039;ve been trying to say, but he says it better:

Capitulation   [Rich Lowry]

&quot;It should be the word of the day. Here&#039;s the New York Times on capitulation in the financial context, a &quot;term of art to describe what happens when even the bullish holdouts, the unflagging optimists, throw up their hands and join the stampede out of the market.&quot; A lot of conservatives are throwing up theirs hands today, driven into depression by last night&#039;s debate. But let&#039;s keep our wits about us, as Mark Steyn recommends. One more thought on Ayers. It&#039;s an entirely legitimate issue, but not a magic bullet. McCain could have brought Ayers up last night, but Obama would have given his stock reply and it wouldn&#039;t have been the &quot;game-changer&quot; everyone&#039;s looking for. And if McCain had repeatedly returned to Ayers, it would have seemed weird and off-key. I think McCain made a pretty good substantive case against Obama, and he lived to fight another day. Palin will presumably continue to make the hot-button case against Obama (and it will get attention because the media&#039;s so obsessed with her), while McCain hits Obama on the issues and experience. Absent some major outside event or a big Obama mistake, they&#039;re going to have to try to grind down his lead in the next couple of weeks. I tend to believe that voters are going to take a serious second look at Obama sometime between now and election day and grapple with whether they&#039;re really comfortable making him president. So this thing&#039;s not over. Are the odds long? Sure, but they always were.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich Lowry in The Corner says what I&#8217;ve been trying to say, but he says it better:</p>
<p>Capitulation   [Rich Lowry]</p>
<p>&#8220;It should be the word of the day. Here&#8217;s the New York Times on capitulation in the financial context, a &#8220;term of art to describe what happens when even the bullish holdouts, the unflagging optimists, throw up their hands and join the stampede out of the market.&#8221; A lot of conservatives are throwing up theirs hands today, driven into depression by last night&#8217;s debate. But let&#8217;s keep our wits about us, as Mark Steyn recommends. One more thought on Ayers. It&#8217;s an entirely legitimate issue, but not a magic bullet. McCain could have brought Ayers up last night, but Obama would have given his stock reply and it wouldn&#8217;t have been the &#8220;game-changer&#8221; everyone&#8217;s looking for. And if McCain had repeatedly returned to Ayers, it would have seemed weird and off-key. I think McCain made a pretty good substantive case against Obama, and he lived to fight another day. Palin will presumably continue to make the hot-button case against Obama (and it will get attention because the media&#8217;s so obsessed with her), while McCain hits Obama on the issues and experience. Absent some major outside event or a big Obama mistake, they&#8217;re going to have to try to grind down his lead in the next couple of weeks. I tend to believe that voters are going to take a serious second look at Obama sometime between now and election day and grapple with whether they&#8217;re really comfortable making him president. So this thing&#8217;s not over. Are the odds long? Sure, but they always were.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkO</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/10/07/the-debate-is-it-over-yet/#comment-100295</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4293#comment-100295</guid>
		<description>I caught only the quip about &quot;hair plugs&quot; during the dull insurance part, and even then McDuck had to allow as how he may need them.  I no longer think he will be tougher with Putin than The One.  What a disaster of an election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught only the quip about &#8220;hair plugs&#8221; during the dull insurance part, and even then McDuck had to allow as how he may need them.  I no longer think he will be tougher with Putin than The One.  What a disaster of an election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
