<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New POLIWOOD &#8211; Special James Bond/Mumbai edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:06:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/#comment-102816</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4597#comment-102816</guid>
		<description>I hate Daniel Craig...he looks like a constipated Vladimir Putin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate Daniel Craig&#8230;he looks like a constipated Vladimir Putin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marymcl</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/#comment-102813</link>
		<dc:creator>marymcl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4597#comment-102813</guid>
		<description>#13 bogie wheel

Well said. Nor would it be a stretch to say that a significant amount of Leftist thinking derives from a reaction against Christianity. 

I love the contrast between the well-known staple of orthodox Marxism that calls religion the opiate of the people, and Czeslow Milosz&#039;s response - that the real opiate is the idea that there is no life after death, no higher power to answer to, no day of reckoning for the evil that men do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#13 bogie wheel</p>
<p>Well said. Nor would it be a stretch to say that a significant amount of Leftist thinking derives from a reaction against Christianity. </p>
<p>I love the contrast between the well-known staple of orthodox Marxism that calls religion the opiate of the people, and Czeslow Milosz&#8217;s response &#8211; that the real opiate is the idea that there is no life after death, no higher power to answer to, no day of reckoning for the evil that men do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marymcl</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/#comment-102787</link>
		<dc:creator>marymcl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4597#comment-102787</guid>
		<description>@12 No. He didn&#039;t &quot;rather those people had died&quot;.  Idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@12 No. He didn&#8217;t &#8220;rather those people had died&#8221;.  Idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bogie wheel</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/#comment-102776</link>
		<dc:creator>bogie wheel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4597#comment-102776</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Original sin comes into play as well. The idea that the behavior of imaginary people is the responsibility of generations living long after them. Going by YEC thinking, at least some 150 generations.&lt;/i&gt;

This isn&#039;t really what the doctrine of original sin means, even ignoring the &quot;imaginary people&quot; snark.

The Founders believed enough in the practical implications of original sin that they created a system of checks and balances to disperse the power in government among various groups, and to give each branch of the federal govt specific means to restrain the other branches.  If the Founders had subscribed to a view of man as innately good, the Constitution would be a radically different document.

I will agree insofar as the &quot;four legs good, two legs bad&quot; mentality and moral relativism are hallmarks of the contemporary Western Left, but I don&#039;t think these things are primarily outworkings, even distorted ones, of Christianity.  The Left is hugely populated by secularists whose beliefs about man, morality, the universe, and God (or the non-existence thereof), descend variously from Darwin and French and German philosophers.  C.S. Lewis&#039; &quot;The Abolition of Man&quot; does a good job, I think, tracing the consequences of those ideas, which were not rooted in Christianity but stood in direct opposition to it.

The Christian Left is the only segment of the Left that really gives any kind of a sincere rip about what Jesus said.  And to the extent that any of them do parrot the &quot;Judge not&quot; verse, it is in ignorance (or convenient airbrushing) of all the other many, many verses in which Jesus talks about judgment and damnation.  A non-judgmental Jesus is the actual &quot;imaginary person&quot; in this scenario.

The Left has also appropriated a lot of ideas from Eastern philosophy and spiritual traditions, as well as pre-Christian animist beliefs.  

Orthodox Christianity is not only not the ideological fount of the modern Western Left, it is and has always been the natural enemy thereof.  Name the issue -- morality, sexuality, sanctity of life, the place of man in the larger world -- and you will find the two groups inevitably on opposite sides of the divide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Original sin comes into play as well. The idea that the behavior of imaginary people is the responsibility of generations living long after them. Going by YEC thinking, at least some 150 generations.</i></p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t really what the doctrine of original sin means, even ignoring the &#8220;imaginary people&#8221; snark.</p>
<p>The Founders believed enough in the practical implications of original sin that they created a system of checks and balances to disperse the power in government among various groups, and to give each branch of the federal govt specific means to restrain the other branches.  If the Founders had subscribed to a view of man as innately good, the Constitution would be a radically different document.</p>
<p>I will agree insofar as the &#8220;four legs good, two legs bad&#8221; mentality and moral relativism are hallmarks of the contemporary Western Left, but I don&#8217;t think these things are primarily outworkings, even distorted ones, of Christianity.  The Left is hugely populated by secularists whose beliefs about man, morality, the universe, and God (or the non-existence thereof), descend variously from Darwin and French and German philosophers.  C.S. Lewis&#8217; &#8220;The Abolition of Man&#8221; does a good job, I think, tracing the consequences of those ideas, which were not rooted in Christianity but stood in direct opposition to it.</p>
<p>The Christian Left is the only segment of the Left that really gives any kind of a sincere rip about what Jesus said.  And to the extent that any of them do parrot the &#8220;Judge not&#8221; verse, it is in ignorance (or convenient airbrushing) of all the other many, many verses in which Jesus talks about judgment and damnation.  A non-judgmental Jesus is the actual &#8220;imaginary person&#8221; in this scenario.</p>
<p>The Left has also appropriated a lot of ideas from Eastern philosophy and spiritual traditions, as well as pre-Christian animist beliefs.  </p>
<p>Orthodox Christianity is not only not the ideological fount of the modern Western Left, it is and has always been the natural enemy thereof.  Name the issue &#8212; morality, sexuality, sanctity of life, the place of man in the larger world &#8212; and you will find the two groups inevitably on opposite sides of the divide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kellogg</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/#comment-102764</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kellogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4597#comment-102764</guid>
		<description>marymcl, #11

He&#039;d rather those people had died? Such a withered and twisted soul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marymcl, #11</p>
<p>He&#8217;d rather those people had died? Such a withered and twisted soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marymcl</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/#comment-102763</link>
		<dc:creator>marymcl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4597#comment-102763</guid>
		<description>The thing I found most offensive about &quot;Munich&quot; was the scene at the very end, where the two men meet on the Brooklyn waterfront with the towers of the World Trade Center across the river behind them. I&#039;m not Jewish, but I lived in Borough Park for a time years ago, and it struck me how baldly accusatory that set up was - as if to say to the orthodox community &quot;You did this. You brought this on the rest of us&quot;. Contemptible.

When &quot;Schindler&#039;s List&quot; came out, I was singing its praises to a a Jewish friend, who was unimpressed. &quot;These Hollywood Jews,&quot; he said. &quot;It takes them 50 years to make a movie about the Holocaust and when they do, the hero&#039;s a Nazi.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I found most offensive about &#8220;Munich&#8221; was the scene at the very end, where the two men meet on the Brooklyn waterfront with the towers of the World Trade Center across the river behind them. I&#8217;m not Jewish, but I lived in Borough Park for a time years ago, and it struck me how baldly accusatory that set up was &#8211; as if to say to the orthodox community &#8220;You did this. You brought this on the rest of us&#8221;. Contemptible.</p>
<p>When &#8220;Schindler&#8217;s List&#8221; came out, I was singing its praises to a a Jewish friend, who was unimpressed. &#8220;These Hollywood Jews,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It takes them 50 years to make a movie about the Holocaust and when they do, the hero&#8217;s a Nazi.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricpic</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/#comment-102762</link>
		<dc:creator>ricpic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4597#comment-102762</guid>
		<description>Clearly Spielberg has tremendous moviemaking expertise and the energy to actualize his dream projects. That said there is something jarringly and permanently jejune about his &quot;vision,&quot; for lack of a better word. The man never grew up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly Spielberg has tremendous moviemaking expertise and the energy to actualize his dream projects. That said there is something jarringly and permanently jejune about his &#8220;vision,&#8221; for lack of a better word. The man never grew up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/#comment-102760</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4597#comment-102760</guid>
		<description>Roger has never read Ian Fleming or seen a Bond film in the &#039;60s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger has never read Ian Fleming or seen a Bond film in the &#8217;60s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roc B.</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/#comment-102759</link>
		<dc:creator>Roc B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4597#comment-102759</guid>
		<description>With respect to QoS, check out the &quot;proposed theme song&quot; for the film...it makes fun of the new movie in a similar vain as the points of your review...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMoJRLStD9c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect to QoS, check out the &#8220;proposed theme song&#8221; for the film&#8230;it makes fun of the new movie in a similar vain as the points of your review&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMoJRLStD9c" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMoJRLStD9c</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New Bond - God Save the Queen! : The Pink Flamingo</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/29/new-poliwood-special-james-bondmumbai-edition/#comment-102755</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Bond - God Save the Queen! : The Pink Flamingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4597#comment-102755</guid>
		<description>[...] Simon on the you know what that the new &#8220;James Bond&#8221; has become.  Once upon a time James Bond was a man&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Simon on the you know what that the new &#8220;James Bond&#8221; has become.  Once upon a time James Bond was a man&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
