<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Did Obama Mean in 2001?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:41:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DavidN</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=78#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Joe SixGun has his political movements confused. Marxists would never distribute wealth like that. Obama&#039;s plan is to tax those who make lots of money, and redistribute the money to various bureaucrats who couldn&#039;t work in the private sector. The public at large will be out in the cold, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe SixGun has his political movements confused. Marxists would never distribute wealth like that. Obama&#8217;s plan is to tax those who make lots of money, and redistribute the money to various bureaucrats who couldn&#8217;t work in the private sector. The public at large will be out in the cold, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklynn Peterson</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklynn Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=78#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Ron, Ron (Radosh)

Back when we both espoused a socialist philosophy you never were a very careful reader or listener.  Here, if you&#039;d objectively and carefully studied the 2001 WBEZ-FM transcript you&#039;d have seen how carefully the consitutional law lecturer Barack Obama explained &quot;redistributive change.&quot;  

Early in the program he refers to the Warren Court being reluctant to saddle local school boards with the costs of implementing court-ordered desegreation policies.  

Near the end, in reply to yet another reader question, he explains essentially the same limits with a new set of words.

It&#039;s clear to me that The One was referring not to &quot;redistributive change&quot; of bucks from mythical Joe the Plumber to some lumpen prolitariat.  He was expressing quite objectively that the Warren Supreme Court hesitated to order &quot;redistributive change&quot; among or between government organizations such as school boards, counties, cities, states, etc.

I find less socialism in Obama&#039;s 2001 transcript than in the recent &quot;Bailout Bill&quot; passed by decidedly capitalist legislators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, Ron (Radosh)</p>
<p>Back when we both espoused a socialist philosophy you never were a very careful reader or listener.  Here, if you&#8217;d objectively and carefully studied the 2001 WBEZ-FM transcript you&#8217;d have seen how carefully the consitutional law lecturer Barack Obama explained &#8220;redistributive change.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Early in the program he refers to the Warren Court being reluctant to saddle local school boards with the costs of implementing court-ordered desegreation policies.  </p>
<p>Near the end, in reply to yet another reader question, he explains essentially the same limits with a new set of words.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear to me that The One was referring not to &#8220;redistributive change&#8221; of bucks from mythical Joe the Plumber to some lumpen prolitariat.  He was expressing quite objectively that the Warren Supreme Court hesitated to order &#8220;redistributive change&#8221; among or between government organizations such as school boards, counties, cities, states, etc.</p>
<p>I find less socialism in Obama&#8217;s 2001 transcript than in the recent &#8220;Bailout Bill&#8221; passed by decidedly capitalist legislators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purl Gurl</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Purl Gurl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=78#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Gaffe Prices embarrasses me, &quot;Thanks for your testimonial. You have humility and love, and a healthy sense of pride. You are a role model for our communities, and our country’s future as well.&quot;

Gaffe! I am no different than others. I am truly a simple Okie girl, a simple person like everyone else.

My medicine animal, Coyote, teaches humility. However, no person needs a medicine animal to learn of the great value of humility.

Role model, well, our family started life on a rural Oklahoma farm. We were very poor. A good work ethic clearly is a must if to escape poverty. We worked our fingers to the bone for decades and today enjoy comfortable wealth. We still work very hard. We firmly believe hard work is the key to success.

Adding to my role model, alone, I am a retired English professor and public school teacher. Presenting a good role model is very important when teaching our American children.

Pride, yes, we are very proud. We are living the American Dream because of our humility, honesty and especially our hard work. People, through hard work, earn pride. You do not need to be wealthy to be proud nor does being poor take away your pride. Personal pride is discovered and earned through simply being a good person, a hard working person. Pride comes from being a good persona and a productive member of our society.

Our hard work and success is not a new story. Our story is an old one and is the story of the many. We are no different than others, we are no better nor any less than other honest hard working people.

Thank you for your kind words. Your words are refreshing in these often hostile blogs.

Okpulot Taha
Choctaw Nation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaffe Prices embarrasses me, &#8220;Thanks for your testimonial. You have humility and love, and a healthy sense of pride. You are a role model for our communities, and our country’s future as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gaffe! I am no different than others. I am truly a simple Okie girl, a simple person like everyone else.</p>
<p>My medicine animal, Coyote, teaches humility. However, no person needs a medicine animal to learn of the great value of humility.</p>
<p>Role model, well, our family started life on a rural Oklahoma farm. We were very poor. A good work ethic clearly is a must if to escape poverty. We worked our fingers to the bone for decades and today enjoy comfortable wealth. We still work very hard. We firmly believe hard work is the key to success.</p>
<p>Adding to my role model, alone, I am a retired English professor and public school teacher. Presenting a good role model is very important when teaching our American children.</p>
<p>Pride, yes, we are very proud. We are living the American Dream because of our humility, honesty and especially our hard work. People, through hard work, earn pride. You do not need to be wealthy to be proud nor does being poor take away your pride. Personal pride is discovered and earned through simply being a good person, a hard working person. Pride comes from being a good persona and a productive member of our society.</p>
<p>Our hard work and success is not a new story. Our story is an old one and is the story of the many. We are no different than others, we are no better nor any less than other honest hard working people.</p>
<p>Thank you for your kind words. Your words are refreshing in these often hostile blogs.</p>
<p>Okpulot Taha<br />
Choctaw Nation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaffe Prices</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaffe Prices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=78#comment-95</guid>
		<description>P.S.

To: Purl Gurl

Thanks for your testimonial. You have humility and love, and a healthy sense of pride. You are a role model for our communities, and our country&#039;s  future  as well. 

Others (like Joe) have a surplus of sarcasm, bitterness, resentment, vindictiveness, cynicism, and criminal (tax scheme) rackets to offer, and little else, to substitute for a soul. No matter how much government is corrupted by tax revenue and spending, they clamor for more. always more.

Also, The platform of Democrat party includes not just support for abortions, but government &lt;i&gt;funding&lt;/i&gt; for &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; abortions. Media won&#039;t ask him about it. Margaret Sanger would be proud.

&quot;Have pity on those, the hopeless sinner, there ain&#039;t no hiding place from the father of creation.&quot; &quot;Them a&#039; pirate&quot; -Robert Marley, and Ini Kamosi, respectively</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.</p>
<p>To: Purl Gurl</p>
<p>Thanks for your testimonial. You have humility and love, and a healthy sense of pride. You are a role model for our communities, and our country&#8217;s  future  as well. </p>
<p>Others (like Joe) have a surplus of sarcasm, bitterness, resentment, vindictiveness, cynicism, and criminal (tax scheme) rackets to offer, and little else, to substitute for a soul. No matter how much government is corrupted by tax revenue and spending, they clamor for more. always more.</p>
<p>Also, The platform of Democrat party includes not just support for abortions, but government <i>funding</i> for <i>all</i> abortions. Media won&#8217;t ask him about it. Margaret Sanger would be proud.</p>
<p>&#8220;Have pity on those, the hopeless sinner, there ain&#8217;t no hiding place from the father of creation.&#8221; &#8220;Them a&#8217; pirate&#8221; -Robert Marley, and Ini Kamosi, respectively</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaffe Prices</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaffe Prices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=78#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Hey Joe, if thats  your &lt;i&gt;reeel&lt;/i&gt; name, This was policy in Alaska. Before Gov. Palin took office. the  difference is that the Chicago machine bribes people with &lt;i&gt;taxpayer&lt;/i&gt; money.


The corruption in Chicago is probably worse, and not improved since the days of Bugs Moran, Frank Nitty, and alCapone, except that those three bribed with their own money. Stroger, ward heeler of Chicago, used tax revenue as a system of patronage to fill gummit jobs with loyal lackeys, who return the favor by paying back a portion of their salary at the legal donation limit (back) to Stroger, 

The good news is that Bugs Moran, Frank Nitty, alCapone, and Stroger will all be voting in the November election.

Democrat party is organized crime with massive P.R. Ubamas is responsible for NO &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; whatsoever, in Chicago, in Springfield Illinois, or U. S. Senate. Name one. Unless by &quot;Reform&quot; you mean, (is code for), &lt;b&gt; more government&lt;/b&gt;. And I think that you do.

Go ahead, name one piece of &quot;reform&quot; that does not involve ubamas bagging (taxpayer) money to pay off ward heelers back in Illinois. Go ahead, I&#039;ll wait. Name one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joe, if thats  your <i>reeel</i> name, This was policy in Alaska. Before Gov. Palin took office. the  difference is that the Chicago machine bribes people with <i>taxpayer</i> money.</p>
<p>The corruption in Chicago is probably worse, and not improved since the days of Bugs Moran, Frank Nitty, and alCapone, except that those three bribed with their own money. Stroger, ward heeler of Chicago, used tax revenue as a system of patronage to fill gummit jobs with loyal lackeys, who return the favor by paying back a portion of their salary at the legal donation limit (back) to Stroger, </p>
<p>The good news is that Bugs Moran, Frank Nitty, alCapone, and Stroger will all be voting in the November election.</p>
<p>Democrat party is organized crime with massive P.R. Ubamas is responsible for NO <b>Reform</b> whatsoever, in Chicago, in Springfield Illinois, or U. S. Senate. Name one. Unless by &#8220;Reform&#8221; you mean, (is code for), <b> more government</b>. And I think that you do.</p>
<p>Go ahead, name one piece of &#8220;reform&#8221; that does not involve ubamas bagging (taxpayer) money to pay off ward heelers back in Illinois. Go ahead, I&#8217;ll wait. Name one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 11B40</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>11B40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=78#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Greetings:

Do despots ever present themselves as &quot;I am the best despot available&quot;?  Don&#039;t think so.  Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Uncle Ho, Pol Pot were all offering social justice via asset redistribution.  I often wonder if despots delude themselves first and then their followers/victims or vice versa.  Are they able to admit, even to themselves that it is the power they want and need.  I think that psychology amply demonstrates that most people don&#039;t know what&#039;s really driving them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings:</p>
<p>Do despots ever present themselves as &#8220;I am the best despot available&#8221;?  Don&#8217;t think so.  Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Uncle Ho, Pol Pot were all offering social justice via asset redistribution.  I often wonder if despots delude themselves first and then their followers/victims or vice versa.  Are they able to admit, even to themselves that it is the power they want and need.  I think that psychology amply demonstrates that most people don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s really driving them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purl Gurl</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Purl Gurl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=78#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Only true surprise I find about American presidential elections this year is a vast majority of Obama supporters are adamantly bent on rendering America a pseudo Marxist nation. This call for rendering America a socialist welfare nation by Obama and his supporters, this truly does surprise me.

Quite ironic an American Indian, like me, an American Indian who has every right to &quot;hate&quot; America, is fighting to defend our Spirit of America, fighting to defend our American ideals, fighting to defend our founding principles of Freedom and Democracy.

Appears there is a Free Lunch in life, appears half or more of Americans expect a Free Lunch paid for by hard working successful Americans.

Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! Give me all I want for free, I am an American! Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! I do not have to work for a living, I am an American!

Gimme my welfare check, Barack!

When I was born, my peoples, we Indians, were not granted American citizenship, were not granted a right to vote. We fought long and hard for citizenship and a right to vote. We won.

Today, Americans are fighting for welfare checks in their mailboxes.

I believe I will pack up my family, head back to our Indian lands, then lead a life of honest hard work, of independence and of pride.

Our family enjoys pride, we will never become welfare recipients; we always have and always will earn our lunch.

Okpulot Taha
Choctaw Nation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only true surprise I find about American presidential elections this year is a vast majority of Obama supporters are adamantly bent on rendering America a pseudo Marxist nation. This call for rendering America a socialist welfare nation by Obama and his supporters, this truly does surprise me.</p>
<p>Quite ironic an American Indian, like me, an American Indian who has every right to &#8220;hate&#8221; America, is fighting to defend our Spirit of America, fighting to defend our American ideals, fighting to defend our founding principles of Freedom and Democracy.</p>
<p>Appears there is a Free Lunch in life, appears half or more of Americans expect a Free Lunch paid for by hard working successful Americans.</p>
<p>Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! Give me all I want for free, I am an American! Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! I do not have to work for a living, I am an American!</p>
<p>Gimme my welfare check, Barack!</p>
<p>When I was born, my peoples, we Indians, were not granted American citizenship, were not granted a right to vote. We fought long and hard for citizenship and a right to vote. We won.</p>
<p>Today, Americans are fighting for welfare checks in their mailboxes.</p>
<p>I believe I will pack up my family, head back to our Indian lands, then lead a life of honest hard work, of independence and of pride.</p>
<p>Our family enjoys pride, we will never become welfare recipients; we always have and always will earn our lunch.</p>
<p>Okpulot Taha<br />
Choctaw Nation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=78#comment-91</guid>
		<description>a few years ago, I saw a video of Obama at a sit-down session, very informal, about income tax and the rich.  He said (I paraphrase) that his father had &quot;enough&quot; money.

The thing is, one&#039;s wages/money, in a capitalist system, is one&#039;s own property.  Remember &quot;property rights&quot;?

In Obama&#039;s world, there should be harsh restrictions on &#039;property rights.&#039;  

Well, I guess the Americans will find out how narrow the restrictions will be.  Especially after Obama has appointed a couple of Supreme Court judges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a few years ago, I saw a video of Obama at a sit-down session, very informal, about income tax and the rich.  He said (I paraphrase) that his father had &#8220;enough&#8221; money.</p>
<p>The thing is, one&#8217;s wages/money, in a capitalist system, is one&#8217;s own property.  Remember &#8220;property rights&#8221;?</p>
<p>In Obama&#8217;s world, there should be harsh restrictions on &#8216;property rights.&#8217;  </p>
<p>Well, I guess the Americans will find out how narrow the restrictions will be.  Especially after Obama has appointed a couple of Supreme Court judges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeSixGunSixPackTheProAmericanPlumber</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeSixGunSixPackTheProAmericanPlumber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=78#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Sarah Palin is a Marxist
Alaska: America&#039;s Socialist State

Sarah Palin&#039;s home state of Alaska is the MOST Socialist state in these United States, and she&#039;s proud of it!

Alaska has no income or sales tax!
That&#039;s because it imposes huge levies on the oil companies that lease its oil fields.
First the state government takes it&#039;s hefty cut, then it redistributes the wealth, cutting a four-figure annual check to every man, woman, and child in the state.  
Sarah Palin was happy to increase this year’s check by $1200, bringing the per-person total to $3,269, helping her maintain her popularity as Governor.
 
I wonder how that&#039;s not &quot;buying&quot; votes?  

Sarah Palin is proud of her states&#039; collective wealth-redistribution scheme.
Sarah Palin said, 
“We’re set up, unlike other states in the union, 
where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. 
So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.” 

Right out of the Karl Marx play book!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin is a Marxist<br />
Alaska: America&#8217;s Socialist State</p>
<p>Sarah Palin&#8217;s home state of Alaska is the MOST Socialist state in these United States, and she&#8217;s proud of it!</p>
<p>Alaska has no income or sales tax!<br />
That&#8217;s because it imposes huge levies on the oil companies that lease its oil fields.<br />
First the state government takes it&#8217;s hefty cut, then it redistributes the wealth, cutting a four-figure annual check to every man, woman, and child in the state.<br />
Sarah Palin was happy to increase this year’s check by $1200, bringing the per-person total to $3,269, helping her maintain her popularity as Governor.</p>
<p>I wonder how that&#8217;s not &#8220;buying&#8221; votes?  </p>
<p>Sarah Palin is proud of her states&#8217; collective wealth-redistribution scheme.<br />
Sarah Palin said,<br />
“We’re set up, unlike other states in the union,<br />
where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources.<br />
So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.” </p>
<p>Right out of the Karl Marx play book!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomson</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/10/27/what-did-obama-mean-in-2001/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=78#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I am going to make it real simple: just how important are abortion and the other cultural war issues to you?  Let&#039;s stop playing games.  It is time for the self deception to cease.  Numerous center-left individuals are trying to pretend that Barack Obama is not really dangerous---because he is on their side in the cultural wars raging within the United States.  Where do your priorities lie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to make it real simple: just how important are abortion and the other cultural war issues to you?  Let&#8217;s stop playing games.  It is time for the self deception to cease.  Numerous center-left individuals are trying to pretend that Barack Obama is not really dangerous&#8212;because he is on their side in the cultural wars raging within the United States.  Where do your priorities lie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
