Ron Radosh

Email This to a Friend

* Your name:

* Your email address:

* Your friend's name:

* Your friend's email address:

Message:

* Required Fields

October 30th, 2008 11:11 am

Will the Real Barack Obama Stand Up?

As we reach the final days before the election, there has been much speculation about what Barack Obama actually stands for. Is he a closet radical, hiding his true agenda under a facade of moderation and pragmatism? Or is he a centrist, a man who opportunistically used radical connections to start his political ascent, only to ditch them when he got to real political power and influence?

Many analysts have already commented and given their answers. At NRO, Stanley Kurtz, who has done yeoman work uncovering Obama’s past in Chicago, makes the case that Obama was a solid radical of the far Left. On Frontpagemag.com, my friend David Horowitz notes that “for his entire adult life, Obama’s closest political allies have been pro-Soviet progressives like state senator Alice Palmer who chose Obama as the politically appropriate figure whom she chose to inherit her state senate seat; or anti-American radicals like Bill Ayers,” and of course, others like Louis Farrakhan and Rev. Jeremiah Wright.  Horowitz concludes that Obama is “a life-long radical posing as a political liberal to win the trust of a larger constituency.”

On the other hand, the MSM media has echoed Obama’s narrative that he is a mainstream centrist figure on economic policy, foreign policy and domestic policy.  Key advisors to his campaign reflect this stance and are doing their best to convince voters that their positions reflect those of candidate Obama.  Dennis Ross, a man whose defense of Israel and concern for its future is well known, is a major advisor on the Middle East. In the past few days, Ross has returned to Florida to campaign before the Jewish community. Apparently the revelations about the refusal of the Los Angeles Times to release the video they hold about Obama’s presence at and participation in the going away party for the Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi has aroused doubts about Obama’s commitment to Israel among older Jewish voters.  Ross is now there to reassure Florida’s Jews about Obama’s love for Israel and shore up their vote.  

The question, then, is who is the real Obama? What will he do when he governs?  Will he  govern from the Center, using these same advisors and refusing to move the nation to the Left. But if his real views are those of the Chicago Obama, the man who made the now famous radio interview arguing for redistribution of wealth as a valid legislative goal, will he and the  Democratic majority in both houses of Congress pass the most extreme legislative agenda  that goes way beyond LBJ’s Great Society?

I frankly do not know which Obama will turn up. We will only learn that soon after his inauguration. I do not, however, hold any doubts as to what he once believed.  Most people have not noticed this, but in a few interviews, Obama has said that in the 1980’s, he attended the Socialist Scholars Conferences held yearly at Cooper Union. That sounds like a scholarly assembly of intellectuals who approach their fields from a socialist perspective. Its innocuous name, however, is more than misleading.

I know this, because I was a founder of the original Socialist Scholars Conference, a group started in the 70’s by actual Marxist and socialist scholars, that discussed intellectual issues. The group held a few meetings, and it soon faded into oblivion. A decade later, its name was taken over by a new group that held meetings that were anything but scholarly. They were, in fact, an assembly of left-wing activists from extreme far Left to moderate Left, with panels galore on political issues and activism, without much scholarship of any kind being discussed. In 1983, for example, after my book on the Rosenberg case came out, they convened a panel to attack it from various perspectives- a panel to which I was not asked to participate or given any chance to answer the slanders presented to the audience.  This was not an example of how scholars discuss serious and controversial works. There were also sessions attacking Israel, with no panels defending the Jewish state. I could continue, but the point is clear. I have often wondered which panels Obama attended, and what he got out of the meetings? No one has bothered to ask him.

 

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

3 Comments

1. dan:

i agree; it’s hard to tell which obama will show up. his past is clear, from his mother to ayers, but who knows? perhaps he’ll be overwhelmed by the grace of the office and his better intentions will predominate. i doubt it, but who knows.

i’m more concerned about the massive subversion that an obama presidency will bring about in the “permanent government,” among other aspects of US institutional life. not that various degrees of subversion haven’t already been routinized, but imagine what a chief executive obama will allow to occur simply as repayment for prior support. he could even continually denounce them, sincerely or otherwise, and yet federal employment law would virtually prohibit their ouster once they were in there. this could have devestating long-term effects – like termites through the first crack in the foundation that you don’t notice until your dining room caves in.

Oct 30, 2008 - 12:01 pm 2. cfbleachers:

Ron, who knows? The point I return to each and every time, is that it was the duty of our information stream…who hold a quasi-public trust..to ask.

They have not. They have shirked their responsibility to this nation. Worse, they have been part and parcel of an active coverup, a conspiracy of silence and misdirection.

To me, this is the greater sin. Senator Obama can be anything he wants to be and run for any office for which he has the appropriate credentials, he can espouse any view and can hold dear any ideals.

We, however, are entitled to know what those are. And not just from the mouths of the candidate, any candidate…not just Senator Obama.

When we are denied facts, when we are handed propaganda, half-truths, distortions and lies by the entrusted guardians of our information, we have stolen from us the ability to self-govern this land of ours.

Senator Obama has not been pressed to define or distinguish the ideologies he has encountered along the way, how they influenced him and precisely where he parts company with them.

This discussion would be fruitful for everyone, most especially Senator Obama, if he indeed seeks to drift significantly more toward the center. In the absence of such dialogue, in the void left in the wake of the conspiracy of silence, one simply cannot make the argument that there is any such drift.

Nothing can grow in that vacuum, least of all an attribution of intent that has not a shred of prior history to support it. Stanley Kurtz is absolutely right on the money once again. This is not about some “gotcha” moment of attachment to bogeyman words, it is an attempt to fill a gaping hole in the belief system and worldview of a candiate for President of the United States.

He has never been given the opportunity to respond and clarify and he has chosen, for whatever reason, not to volunteer information that addresses these issues.

The Obama/Biden ticket has shown no interest in resolving this black hole. Very few questions go in and absolutely nothing comes back out. We are left to assume. That’s unfortunate and that’s unfair. To everyone.

Oct 30, 2008 - 1:45 pm 3. David Thomson:

“We will only learn that soon after his inauguration”

Barack Obama’s inauguration? Let’s drop a chill pill. This election is not over. John McCain can still pull this out.

“Ross is now there to reassure Florida’s Jews about Obama’s love for Israel and shore up their vote.”

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Dennis Ross undoubtably has the best intentions. Nonetheless, that’s simply not enough. The dude’s head is not on straight. He unwittingly is responsible for the murders of countless Israelis. Is this naive guy really endorsing Obama? If so, American Jews should be voting for John McCain in this election!

Oct 31, 2008 - 10:34 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments:
 

Ron Radosh

Author Photo

Pages

Archives

Books