Yes, I read “United in Hate” by Jamie Glazov. Verily this book should be studied more than simply read, it’s crucial to the understanding of today’s far-left liberal, and liberal in general, mind, in relation to the Islamic threat to our civilization.

Expect something very different from Ann Coulter. Although, as I conservative, I like and admire Ms. Coulter, hers is not my style, and sincerely I only tried once one of her books and found it desultory and not well written, did not finish it, and donated it to Goodwill. I prefer to hear her talk.

But Glazov is a brainy guy, a genius perhaps, and his book brings new light to the baffling subject in question: that liberal that hates and works against his own great country that nurtures and provides him with the stage for his own success (Ward Churchill, Reverend Wright, Noam Chomsky, Jane Fonda, Sean Penn, and on, and on, and on).

“United in Hate” draws heavily from a famous classic, which I also ordered and am finishing now, one great book that was recommended by the late President Eisenhower, “The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movement” by Eric Hoffer. Glazov even uses the “true believer” term throughout his new book.
http://www.amazon.com/True-Believer-Thoughts-Movements-Perennial/dp/0060505915/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1238204910&sr=1-1

The willing tools who support the Cohen side of the argument, would do well to read Tony Cordesman’s analysis of an Iran-Israel nuclear exchange.

The short version?

This would mean, Cordesman suggests, some 16 million to 28 million Iranians dead within 21 days, and between 200,000 and 800,000 Israelis dead within the same time frame. The total of deaths beyond 21 days could rise very much higher, depending on civil defense and public health facilities, where Israel has a major advantage.

Cordesman assumes that Iran, with less than 30 nuclear warheads in the period after 2010, would aim for the main population centers of Tel Aviv and Haifa, while Israel would have more than 200 warheads and far better delivery systems, including cruise missiles launched from its 3 Dolphin-class submarines.

The very short version ?

Cordesman spells out that the real stakes in the crisis that is building over Iran’s nuclear ambitions would certainly include the end of Persian civilization, quite probably the end of Egyptian civilization, and the end of the Oil Age. This would also mean the end of globalization and the extraordinary accretions in world trade and growth and prosperity that are hauling hundreds of millions of Chinese and Indians and others out of poverty.

The rest is foolish posturing.

He is not alone. He belongs to the same Jewish tribe as America-Number-One-Hater Noam Chomsky, and Castro-Friend Steven Spielberg. They are many more in between.

Learn this to be a mental malady, in the strictest sense of the word. They must hate the hand that feeds them, so as to mask self-loathing and self-contempt, and a deep feeling of frustration. Justification is soon brought in, for how can you explain hating what nurtures you, allows your freedom to blossom, but by a perverted sense of justifying the opposite.

Recent typical example. Yesterday in the O’Reilly factor, Fox contributor and left loony Dr. Hill, in a discussion about the drug war in Mexico, totally placed the blame on the US for “exploiting” the masses and the poor in Mexico that then do not have any other choice than to lash out with drug trafficking. Talk about perverted logic.

Yes, there must be blame for the US consuming the drugs, even for arms going south, but to ascribe blame for something obviously the result of Mexican’s societal choices is to force yourself to find a scapegoat.

Likewise, Obama et al, believes the grievance of the Arabs is because they were also “exploited” by capitalists (white capitalists of course) trumping what even Obama Bin Laden tells us in every video, that this fight is not one caused by exploitation of any sort, but simply by Quoranic guidance against the Kafir.