http://greensrealworld.blogspot.com/2009/05/what-his-gitmo-speech-reveals-about.html

real nice…starting the process…that’s a good one.

“and putting suspected terrorist in high security prisons.”

the vast majority of the country’s national gang leaders are in one prison,housed in the same building..the same unit.pelican bay SHU.guess what…. these “shot callers”still control the gangs……despite the strictest security imaginable……they still order murders.so you think bringing terrorists here is a good idea?

“He has also made public his view on water boarding as an unethical form of torture.”

which is why he retained the right to use it….when he feels like it.

“Obama has gone to Europe to apologize for America’s last 8 years.”

which america was this?

“The lack of action in Afghanistan and the offensive approach to war with Iraq lost all empathy for the 9/11 attacks. It set us back.”

i could care less about people’s ‘empathy’ when all they offer is empty platitudes.
if you think commiting additional conventional land forces to afganistan was a good idea…well then your among the smallest minority of the informed.
a bunch of dead tango’s is not’a set back’……it is progress.

And Obama is full of bovine excerement. Cheney, facts. I’m waiting for your point-by-point refutation of his speeech – since you know so damn much.

Enlighten us – really – show us some facts. Your opinion? well, ust like anuses, everybody’s got one, and yours smells.

Nice try.

The idea that the GOP needs a terror attack wasn’t mine. I was just passing on this gem:
In his first interview as the chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party, Dennis Milligan told a reporter that America needs to be attacked by terrorists so that people will appreciate the work that President Bush has done to protect the country.

Cheney appears to be pursuing the same ‘logic’.

@63. shaui-jan:

that comment encapsualates so much ignorance…..so succinctly…i am at a loss for words…good job.

I really can’t take credit – it was an ‘inside’ job.

@65. twolaneflash:

Thinking and arguing with honesty and clarity is not the way of liberals. The compulsion of the left to generate emotional conflict filled with fear, uncertainty, and doubt, then to call that an honorable argument. The Alinsky rules for radicals are only effective against the ignorant and gullible.

I’m quite sure that Cheney’s remarks were intended to generate emotional conflict filled with fear, uncertainty, and doubt. It would be willfully dishonest to call Cheney’s an honorable argument based on your criteria.

You make this too easy. Cheney is preying on the worst fears and prejudices of the people and all you can do is complain that Obama wants to restore the rule of law. Ignorant and gullible? Keep up the demonstration. You’re doing it right.

Peace.

DS

PS – Have fun hunting with Cheney!

North Korea’s nuclear test today just shows once more Obama is out of his depth.

Cheney had it all wrong.

Keeping things simple.