<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Day After</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:16:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: стАрик</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/comment-page-5/#comment-8133</link>
		<dc:creator>стАрик</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/?p=353#comment-8133</guid>
		<description>А вы не пробывали зарабатывать в интернете?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>А вы не пробывали зарабатывать в интернете?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patruped:bun biped:rău /</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/comment-page-5/#comment-7528</link>
		<dc:creator>patruped:bun biped:rău /</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/?p=353#comment-7528</guid>
		<description>[...] un articol foarte bun, desi un pic cam lungut si cu citeva referinte despre care nu prea am idee: The Day After Victor Davishanson November 6th, 2008 2:48 am  Reconciliation I wish President-elect Obama well, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] un articol foarte bun, desi un pic cam lungut si cu citeva referinte despre care nu prea am idee: The Day After Victor Davishanson November 6th, 2008 2:48 am  Reconciliation I wish President-elect Obama well, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/comment-page-5/#comment-7496</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/?p=353#comment-7496</guid>
		<description>True comedy. Thanks.

I particularly enjoyed the statement that pretends the nonexistence of Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Bill O&#039;Reilly, James Dobson, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True comedy. Thanks.</p>
<p>I particularly enjoyed the statement that pretends the nonexistence of Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Bill O&#8217;Reilly, James Dobson, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank Miller</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/comment-page-5/#comment-7461</link>
		<dc:creator>frank Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/?p=353#comment-7461</guid>
		<description>VDH--

You remain, as ever, a repository of sanity.

As a Catholic and a determined Zionist. I must ask you to answer the Iranian&#039;s mad goal of genocide.

I know you&#039;ve addressed this before, but it bears repeating.

FM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VDH&#8211;</p>
<p>You remain, as ever, a repository of sanity.</p>
<p>As a Catholic and a determined Zionist. I must ask you to answer the Iranian&#8217;s mad goal of genocide.</p>
<p>I know you&#8217;ve addressed this before, but it bears repeating.</p>
<p>FM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul_Unalaska</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/comment-page-5/#comment-7379</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul_Unalaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/?p=353#comment-7379</guid>
		<description>Jerry,

    Your, &quot;Obama was right..&quot;.  has me thinking back to the town hall meeting in Mel Brook&#039;s, &#039;Blazing Saddles&#039;.  &quot;Howard Johnson is right..&quot;.  No dog at you.  Honest.

    Many people, including myself are concerned with the future of our country.  We&#039;ve a right to be.  Sen. Obama speaks of leadership.  A leader will do, say or approach items even as his/her suboordinates  wouldn&#039;t favor.  Sen. Obama voted &#039;Present&#039; 130 + times in Senate on difficult bills.  97% of the time his voting was for the Democratic angle.  To me, personally, it&#039;s unethical for a President to have this type of record and be considered a &#039;leader.&#039;

    There&#039;s a caveat of other issues but you get my point.  Like many, I had to pick up his books and opposing view&#039;s books as well to get a glimpse of the man, Sen. Obama.  Why?  For no one was forthcoming to speak of (Sen. Obama) or willing to ask these questions (media).  His &#039;hope&#039; and &#039;change&#039; rhetoric is similiar to that of inspirational speaker Tony Robbins.  The difference is Mr. Robbins has applied his concept, which he&#039;s molded after decades of use and kinking to successfully flourish for those interested parties.  Sen. Obama will be applying his never before used techniques to 300 + million people of the strongest nation on earth.  That&#039;s quite a Herculean task.  Hence the foreboding vibe..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry,</p>
<p>    Your, &#8220;Obama was right..&#8221;.  has me thinking back to the town hall meeting in Mel Brook&#8217;s, &#8216;Blazing Saddles&#8217;.  &#8220;Howard Johnson is right..&#8221;.  No dog at you.  Honest.</p>
<p>    Many people, including myself are concerned with the future of our country.  We&#8217;ve a right to be.  Sen. Obama speaks of leadership.  A leader will do, say or approach items even as his/her suboordinates  wouldn&#8217;t favor.  Sen. Obama voted &#8216;Present&#8217; 130 + times in Senate on difficult bills.  97% of the time his voting was for the Democratic angle.  To me, personally, it&#8217;s unethical for a President to have this type of record and be considered a &#8216;leader.&#8217;</p>
<p>    There&#8217;s a caveat of other issues but you get my point.  Like many, I had to pick up his books and opposing view&#8217;s books as well to get a glimpse of the man, Sen. Obama.  Why?  For no one was forthcoming to speak of (Sen. Obama) or willing to ask these questions (media).  His &#8216;hope&#8217; and &#8216;change&#8217; rhetoric is similiar to that of inspirational speaker Tony Robbins.  The difference is Mr. Robbins has applied his concept, which he&#8217;s molded after decades of use and kinking to successfully flourish for those interested parties.  Sen. Obama will be applying his never before used techniques to 300 + million people of the strongest nation on earth.  That&#8217;s quite a Herculean task.  Hence the foreboding vibe..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/comment-page-5/#comment-7371</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/?p=353#comment-7371</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding? Bush and his cronies ran this country into the ground. America is worse off than it was 8 years ago. Criticism from the Left and from any other rational-minded human beings is totally valid and you people re-elected the fool in 2004 and wanted more of the same incompetence a week ago.

Judging from many of the comments here, you people don&#039;t get it and probably never will. Obama was right, you do take pride in ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding? Bush and his cronies ran this country into the ground. America is worse off than it was 8 years ago. Criticism from the Left and from any other rational-minded human beings is totally valid and you people re-elected the fool in 2004 and wanted more of the same incompetence a week ago.</p>
<p>Judging from many of the comments here, you people don&#8217;t get it and probably never will. Obama was right, you do take pride in ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemesis443</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/comment-page-5/#comment-7350</link>
		<dc:creator>nemesis443</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/?p=353#comment-7350</guid>
		<description>I will give President-elect Obama the necessary respect and hope his election will benefit America, not hurt it. That said, I will do no such thing for the democrat Congress and the bds nuts! I will treat them with the contempt and scorn they have rightly earned! If someone comes up to me and says we should work together when I know for a fact they called Bush Hitler or a war criminal I will tell them f--- off! As for the Congress, they no longer have Bush to hide behind. People will soon understand why this is the lowest rated Congress ever! Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, James Moran, Barney Frank, Chris &quot;Countrywide&quot; Dodd, they are are all corrupt scum and the voters will soon come to regret putting all that power in their hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will give President-elect Obama the necessary respect and hope his election will benefit America, not hurt it. That said, I will do no such thing for the democrat Congress and the bds nuts! I will treat them with the contempt and scorn they have rightly earned! If someone comes up to me and says we should work together when I know for a fact they called Bush Hitler or a war criminal I will tell them f&#8212; off! As for the Congress, they no longer have Bush to hide behind. People will soon understand why this is the lowest rated Congress ever! Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, James Moran, Barney Frank, Chris &#8220;Countrywide&#8221; Dodd, they are are all corrupt scum and the voters will soon come to regret putting all that power in their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrett</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/comment-page-5/#comment-7349</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/?p=353#comment-7349</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read remarks about being the &quot;loyal opposition&quot; and to avoid what would essentially be the Borking of Obama.

First, what does loyal opposition mean?  Loyal to what?  My view, until proven otherwise by actions and not words, is that I will be loyal to America and the Constitution.  I have no loyalty to Obama.  I am not a cult follower (nor would I be if a conservative was elected President).  

Obama is a narcissist, who has openly stated he sees the Constitution as flawed.  He wants a civilian security force that is funded as well as the army.  What for?  To crush dissent?  Obama has not said.  A quick history lesson will tell you that this is not the stuff of free societies.  He raised more money (more than $600 million) than anyone in the history of Presidential campaigns in part by disabling credit card security.  We have no idea where the money came from.  We don&#039;t know where he was born, who paid for his education, what his grades were....  We don&#039;t know much about him at all.

What we do know is that he has made all kinds of statements from &quot;spread the wealth around&quot; to calling for refundable tax credits to punishing the few in the media that had the nerve to ask a few tough questions by eliminating access.  What we do know is Obama has close relationships with repugnant characters like Wright, Rezko, Ayers and Pfleger.  And there is more than I can catalog here now.  All of that makes me uncomfortable.  

Obama should be called out for every dumb policy decision he makes whether it is in a speech, by Executive Order, the appointment of liberal judges or by signing legislation submitted by what I expect will be an insane Reid-Pelosi Congress.

Be prepared to be pummeled when demanding that the Constitution is upheld.  I do not think it is going to be pretty.  Anyone who opposes Obama or the left will be vilified.

In case you haven&#039;t figured it out, we are playing with the political thugs from Chicago.  Conservatives can spin it down the high road, if that virtue means something.  I am not saying that conservatives should lie or be unethical.  Let&#039;s leave that as part of the SOP for the Democrats.  But you can get beaten up pretty good if you are not willing to defend yourself or take the fight to the bully.  Rahm doesn&#039;t plan on taking prisoners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read remarks about being the &#8220;loyal opposition&#8221; and to avoid what would essentially be the Borking of Obama.</p>
<p>First, what does loyal opposition mean?  Loyal to what?  My view, until proven otherwise by actions and not words, is that I will be loyal to America and the Constitution.  I have no loyalty to Obama.  I am not a cult follower (nor would I be if a conservative was elected President).  </p>
<p>Obama is a narcissist, who has openly stated he sees the Constitution as flawed.  He wants a civilian security force that is funded as well as the army.  What for?  To crush dissent?  Obama has not said.  A quick history lesson will tell you that this is not the stuff of free societies.  He raised more money (more than $600 million) than anyone in the history of Presidential campaigns in part by disabling credit card security.  We have no idea where the money came from.  We don&#8217;t know where he was born, who paid for his education, what his grades were&#8230;.  We don&#8217;t know much about him at all.</p>
<p>What we do know is that he has made all kinds of statements from &#8220;spread the wealth around&#8221; to calling for refundable tax credits to punishing the few in the media that had the nerve to ask a few tough questions by eliminating access.  What we do know is Obama has close relationships with repugnant characters like Wright, Rezko, Ayers and Pfleger.  And there is more than I can catalog here now.  All of that makes me uncomfortable.  </p>
<p>Obama should be called out for every dumb policy decision he makes whether it is in a speech, by Executive Order, the appointment of liberal judges or by signing legislation submitted by what I expect will be an insane Reid-Pelosi Congress.</p>
<p>Be prepared to be pummeled when demanding that the Constitution is upheld.  I do not think it is going to be pretty.  Anyone who opposes Obama or the left will be vilified.</p>
<p>In case you haven&#8217;t figured it out, we are playing with the political thugs from Chicago.  Conservatives can spin it down the high road, if that virtue means something.  I am not saying that conservatives should lie or be unethical.  Let&#8217;s leave that as part of the SOP for the Democrats.  But you can get beaten up pretty good if you are not willing to defend yourself or take the fight to the bully.  Rahm doesn&#8217;t plan on taking prisoners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Riser</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/comment-page-5/#comment-7332</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Riser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/?p=353#comment-7332</guid>
		<description>To E.B. up there. It is unfair to call Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin, and Sean Hannity &#039;propagandists&#039; since all of them are admitted and unabashed conservative pundits who promote an unapologetically conservative agenda, which means they&#039;re generally in agreement with and supportive of Republican politicians--albeit not always and not exclusively, since Republican politicians often say and do things counter to conservatism. Limbaugh, Malkin, and Hannity would be propagandists, however, if they claimed an objective viewpoint while surreptiously doing all they could to promote a given candidate or issue. You know, like Newsweek, NYT, LAT, WaPo, NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, AP, Reuters...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To E.B. up there. It is unfair to call Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin, and Sean Hannity &#8216;propagandists&#8217; since all of them are admitted and unabashed conservative pundits who promote an unapologetically conservative agenda, which means they&#8217;re generally in agreement with and supportive of Republican politicians&#8211;albeit not always and not exclusively, since Republican politicians often say and do things counter to conservatism. Limbaugh, Malkin, and Hannity would be propagandists, however, if they claimed an objective viewpoint while surreptiously doing all they could to promote a given candidate or issue. You know, like Newsweek, NYT, LAT, WaPo, NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, AP, Reuters&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deguello</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/the-day-after-2/comment-page-5/#comment-7329</link>
		<dc:creator>deguello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/?p=353#comment-7329</guid>
		<description>Hey poltroon! I mean Hanson! How about we start naming abortion mills, condom distribution centers, welfare offices, and methadone clinics after Obama?What are you doing writing about the Spartans? It&#039;s surreal;like an alcoholic writing about the Volstead act!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey poltroon! I mean Hanson! How about we start naming abortion mills, condom distribution centers, welfare offices, and methadone clinics after Obama?What are you doing writing about the Spartans? It&#8217;s surreal;like an alcoholic writing about the Volstead act!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
