Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
Well if its dead, then its corpse is blocking the entire liberal yellow brick road. If you’re a “progressive” and you thought that the election last November meant that you were finally going to see your agenda put into place because all of those damnable republicans were out of your way, you have to be pretty disappointed.
Lets check the scoreboard and see how its all turning out:
…With both houses of congress and the executive branch in the hands of liberals, moderates and downright socialists were still have troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, Guantanamo is still open, Health Care is still in the hands of blood sucking insurance profiteers and worse, the whole concept of a single payer public plan has been so soundly rejected that the whole plan for ‘health care reform’ is now redefined to mean something else altogether; ‘cap and trade’ is suffocating while it sits under the humid butt cheeks of the Senate and worst of all, the new messiah has become a laughing stock( laughed at by congress, on live TV, in joint session. ).
Short of an outright coup, there just isn’t any way for the left to get control of more of the government and yet here we are in virtual stalemate. This was not supposed to happen and yet, here we are. Its quite an accomplishment if you think about it and there’s only one reason for it, conservatism still exists and it exists in the right place, in the public itself. I don’t for a second think that conservatism is at work in the halls of government, but I am certain that a large number of the 4th branch of government, (the voting populace) have now rediscovered the simple joy of human liberty and are acting accordingly.
To an extent, it is true that W. has wrecked the social conservative – fiscal conservative alliance. Those of us who are FC finally got fed up with the nanny-state from the right. It does mark an end to the Reagan coalition.
Sarah Palin might be able to reforge it on differing grounds. She’s ok with teaching contraceptives in school (unlike W.) and not teaching creationism. So there might be a smaller government coalition, where we can agree to disagree with our private beliefs.
I just hope this is the high water mark for the liberal left.
Those of us who are FC finally got fed up with the nanny-state from the right.
Look, I’m one of those Republican voters who’s got no problem with gay marriage, pot, or molecular biology, but – what nanny state from the right? What did W do for social cons? It looks to me like he threw out fiscal conservatism for the sake of Wilsonian democracy-spreading, and he managed to keep the social cons pretty much by having all the right enemies. Plus maintaining all the same retrograde, neofascist, etc etc policies wrt to marriage and drugs that Clinton had and Obama has.
…although, speaking as someone with some social-con sympathies, I don’t regard that, nor most of the crap Huckabee favored as a presidential candidate, legitimately part of a social-con agenda. They were nanny-state ideas that happened to be proposed by men claiming to be conservative, but that doesn’t make them social-con.
Sep 16, 2009 - 6:33 am
Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.
PJM Home
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
5 Comments
1. frank martin:Well if its dead, then its corpse is blocking the entire liberal yellow brick road. If you’re a “progressive” and you thought that the election last November meant that you were finally going to see your agenda put into place because all of those damnable republicans were out of your way, you have to be pretty disappointed.
Lets check the scoreboard and see how its all turning out:
…With both houses of congress and the executive branch in the hands of liberals, moderates and downright socialists were still have troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, Guantanamo is still open, Health Care is still in the hands of blood sucking insurance profiteers and worse, the whole concept of a single payer public plan has been so soundly rejected that the whole plan for ‘health care reform’ is now redefined to mean something else altogether; ‘cap and trade’ is suffocating while it sits under the humid butt cheeks of the Senate and worst of all, the new messiah has become a laughing stock( laughed at by congress, on live TV, in joint session. ).
Short of an outright coup, there just isn’t any way for the left to get control of more of the government and yet here we are in virtual stalemate. This was not supposed to happen and yet, here we are. Its quite an accomplishment if you think about it and there’s only one reason for it, conservatism still exists and it exists in the right place, in the public itself. I don’t for a second think that conservatism is at work in the halls of government, but I am certain that a large number of the 4th branch of government, (the voting populace) have now rediscovered the simple joy of human liberty and are acting accordingly.
Sep 15, 2009 - 9:20 am 2. rbj:To an extent, it is true that W. has wrecked the social conservative – fiscal conservative alliance. Those of us who are FC finally got fed up with the nanny-state from the right. It does mark an end to the Reagan coalition.
Sarah Palin might be able to reforge it on differing grounds. She’s ok with teaching contraceptives in school (unlike W.) and not teaching creationism. So there might be a smaller government coalition, where we can agree to disagree with our private beliefs.
I just hope this is the high water mark for the liberal left.
Sep 15, 2009 - 11:36 am 3. bgates:Those of us who are FC finally got fed up with the nanny-state from the right.
Look, I’m one of those Republican voters who’s got no problem with gay marriage, pot, or molecular biology, but – what nanny state from the right? What did W do for social cons? It looks to me like he threw out fiscal conservatism for the sake of Wilsonian democracy-spreading, and he managed to keep the social cons pretty much by having all the right enemies. Plus maintaining all the same retrograde, neofascist, etc etc policies wrt to marriage and drugs that Clinton had and Obama has.
Sep 15, 2009 - 9:35 pm 4. McGehee:Medicare prescription benefit. Biggest new entitlement program since LBJ.
Sep 16, 2009 - 6:30 am 5. McGehee:…although, speaking as someone with some social-con sympathies, I don’t regard that, nor most of the crap Huckabee favored as a presidential candidate, legitimately part of a social-con agenda. They were nanny-state ideas that happened to be proposed by men claiming to be conservative, but that doesn’t make them social-con.
Sep 16, 2009 - 6:33 amSorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.