If the price of freedom is eternal vigilance, then the cost of voting Democrat is whatever they decide to charge you for a $15,000 insurance policy. Or five years in jail. Decisions, decisions.
Honestly, for being stupid enough to vote for that crowd, you’re getting off cheap. Then again, I didn’t vote for any of these jokers — so get the hell out of my way.
PJM Home
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
8 Comments
1. rbj:Yet we dare not call it fascism.
Nov 6, 2009 - 6:42 pm 2. Tweets that mention Vodkapundit ยป You Asked for It -- Topsy.com:[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Stephen Green, Mack McGuire. Mack McGuire said: RT @VodkaPundit: Price freedom: Eternal vigilance. Cost voting Dem: Whatever they charge 2 buy insurance.(http://bit.ly/3Wp02a) #TCOT #TLOT [...]
Nov 6, 2009 - 7:03 pm 3. The BoBo:Amen! The problem is that we have only learned of this provision today. Given they plan on voting on it sometime this weekend – and the phone lines are all closed on the weekends – kinda hard to mount a strong defense. Well, I guess when those idiot libbers who voted these nimrods in to office find themselves faced with this decision – we’ll see how smart they feel then!
Nov 6, 2009 - 8:58 pm 4. Casey:Well, rbj, it isn’t fascism, no matter what Jonah Goldberg says…
Nov 6, 2009 - 11:36 pm 5. uberVU - social comments:Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by VodkaPundit: Price of freedom: Eternal vigilance. Cost of voting Democrat: Whatever they charge to buy their insurance.(http://bit.ly/3Wp02a) #TCOT #TLOT…
Nov 7, 2009 - 6:20 am 6. Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Don’t Have Insurance ? PelosiCare Has A $ 15,000 Fine For That:[...] Stephen Green said, anyone who voted for the fools who came up with this plan deserves whatever they get. The [...]
Nov 7, 2009 - 8:17 am 7. rbj:Well Casey, there is no one perfect definition of fascism, and the word has been abused by the Left against Reagan and Bush, but I will quote part of its definition from wikipedia:
“Fascists explicitly promoted their ideology as a “Third Position” between capitalism and communism.[130] Italian Fascism involved corporatism, a political system in which economy is collectively managed by employers, workers and state officials by formal mechanisms at national level.[131] Fascists advocated a new national multi-class economic system that is labeled as either national corporatism, national socialism or national syndicalism.[26] The common aim of all fascist movements was elimination of the autonomy or, in some cases, the existence of large-scale capitalism.[132]
Fascist governments exercised influence over the economy differently than that of communist-led states, in that individual private property was controlled but not nationalized.[133] Nevertheless, like the Soviet Union, fascist states pursued economic policies to strengthen state power and spread ideology, such as consolidating trade unions to be state or party-controlled.[134] ”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism#Economic_policies
Forcing everyone to spend the fruits of their labor on a specific item is definitely strengthening government control over 1/6 of the national economy. Now, if there were only the state run National Health Service, that would be socialism. Fascism allows some private enterprise that is severely regulated.
Thus, I call this health care overhaul fascism. It may be Mussolini-lite fascism, (and is in no way Hitlerian fascism) but it is fascism.
Nov 7, 2009 - 10:27 am 8. arhooley:We need to get the word “REPEAL” to the top of our vocabulary list fast.
Nov 7, 2009 - 12:00 pmSorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.