November 13th, 2009 12:24 pm

The Week in Blogs — The Links!

As seen on PJTV, here are this week’s picks:

Stomach churning reactions.

Good question.

Cheap, even for a Congressman.

Signed, Let Down on the Left.

They don’t call’em czars for nothin’.

Uh

There is a doctor in the house senate.

Not if it’s a prank call.

Uh…” again, times infinity.

Find out what it all means on PJTV.

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

7 Comments

1. Garrett:

Was Gibbs in a coma 5 years ago? Or does he just think the rest of us were?

Nov 15, 2009 - 6:28 am 2. Common Sense:

I am very worried about the number of voting people in this Country who are unable to discern cause and effect relationships between governmental policies and the quality of their lives. How much freedom do “We the People” have to lose before the majority realises who is best serving our interests? Thanks for continuing to rebut the lies and misrepresentations EVERY WEEK!

Nov 15, 2009 - 8:51 am 3. jon:

Re: Good question.

The question of political correctness is one that really needs to be addressed in this case, for two reasons.

First, not getting rid of a soldier who was off his rocker was a bad idea, in the easy realm of 20/20 hindsight. Not getting rid of him because it would look bad only makes it look worse now. Equality and political correctness aren’t necessarily at odds, but in this case safety and political correctness were.

And second, it is looking more and more as if Major Hasan was subjected to very un-PC behavior by other soldiers around him. Scratching “Arab” into his car, calling him a “raghead” and other things should not have been tolerated, no matter how much it would be “politically correct” to suggest that those other soldiers should have not done that.

Was it a workplace shooting with terrorist undertones or a terrorist shooting with workplace undertones? I don’t really give a damn, since the guy was clearly a bastard who deserves what justice will dole out to him. Maybe it’s not a good idea to pick on someone’s ethnicity and religion to the point where he snaps. If the stories about his treatment in the Army are true, this guy’s story will contain some element of twisted righteousness to go along with his murderous insanity. No, that doesn’t justify diddly squat. Nothing can justify what he did. But it shouldn’t be ignored, either.

Nov 15, 2009 - 9:38 am 4. arhooley:

jon, why so equivocating?

Maybe it’s not a good idea to pick on someone’s ethnicity and religion to the point where he snaps.

Come on, run that ball down the field.

Nov 15, 2009 - 10:41 am 5. McGehee:

Equality and political correctness aren’t necessarily at odds

Why is political correctness even a consideration? Who the meep cares whether something is at odds with it?

(Jon, apparently.)

Nov 15, 2009 - 11:42 am 6. Cold Fury » “These are some seriously deranged people”:

[...] (Via VP) [...]

Nov 15, 2009 - 11:43 am 7. jon:

Run that ball down the field? I’m not going to. There just isn’t any real way that the victims deserved what happened, even if every single one of them was hanging Hasan in effigy, pissing in his coffee, scratching “Jesus Saves” into the hood of his car, and calling him every name in the book and doing almost everything in their power to make his life a living hell. There are better means to deal with issues than using a gun, as any and everyone knows. Still, the dude did snap. I can freely speculate on responsibility without taking anything away from Hasan’s full culpability for what happened.

Hasan was, from what I’ve read, a nutjob sociopath, but even nutjob sociopath coworkers shouldn’t be treated inhumanely. They should, however, lose their jobs if they can’t do them according to workplace rules. The same goes for those who will be investigated into their conduct in the months leading up to this killing spree. Provided, of course, there was misbehavior. If it was a case where abusive behavior was continuing for a long time, there may or may not be paper trails and witnesses to that, and some people who should have fired Hasan and others will lose their positions of authority. That’s just how things are, how things should be, and how things will be for as long as we give a crap about treating people equally. Supervisors should control their subordinates when they’re out of line, and if they don’t they don’t get to keep their jobs. That’s true where I work, in the military, and in most other places where workplace rules dictate that people don’t treat each other like crap.

Nov 15, 2009 - 12:32 pm

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.


Stephen Green

Author Photo

Archives