7:56 PM EDT: Hurricane Ike’s eye is now fully visible on short-range Houston radar. It’s strengthening, too: Ike has an eye now, and that eye is contracting. Winds are up to 110 mph. Ike’s odds of attaining Category 3 status have increased — though the media is still overemphasizing this point. It’s the surge that matters, not the category.
And the surge is continuing to roll in: at the entrance to Galveston Bay, the tide should be going out, but instead the water level is still rising, now above nine feet. By the time we get to “low tide,” it may be at 10 feet. And then the tide will start to come in — and with it, the heart of Ike’s storm surge. Remember, we’re still 6+ hours away from landfall!
I think the general public, nationwide, is going to be stunned and confused when a “Category 2″ or “weak Category 3″ hurricane causes the sort of catastrophic damage that Ike is going to cause. I just saw, on my muted TV, Bill O’Reilly promoting a segment called “Hurricane Hype.” Huh?? That might have been an interesting topic during Edouard, Fay, Gustav or Hanna — but now? Tonight? When the real deal is bearing down on the coastline? The national news media has no freakin’ clue what’s going on. Hopefully the folks in Texas, at least, understand what’s coming.
Anyway, Alan Sullivan’s last two updates sum things up:
Update: 6:00 PM EDT: Ike is taking a wobble to the west, as I suspected it might when it got to this part of the Gulf. The great gyre is running out of sea-room, and trying to stay over water. So it is certain now: landfall will be southwest of Galveston, and the worst of the surge will pile into the Houston area. Everything has gone exactly wrong for Houston this time. It’s payback for Rita’s last minute swerve away.
Update: 7:30 PM EDT: The huge ring is contracting and forming a proper eye. Actually the storm is getting weaker — less total energy is being released. But approaching this concave coast, Ike is restructuring to fit the shape of the obstacle. It is common for tropical cyclones to intensify prior to landfall here. I have been hoping the loss of convective energy would compensate and keep intensity from increasing markedly. Everything has gone exactly wrong for Houston this time, as though Ike were payback for Rita’s last-minute swerve away, three years ago.
In a way, 2008’s Gustav-Ike duo is almost a mirror image of 2005’s Katrina-Rita duo. Three years ago, the “New Orleans” storm was the calamity, whereas the “Houston” storm turned aside, and catastrophe was averted. This time around, it was the “New Orleans” storm that spared us a full-on catastrophe, whereas the “Houston” storm is going to be very, very bad (albeit, like Katrina, not a literal “worst-case scenario”).
P.S. Dr. Jeff Masters quantifies Sullivan’s point that “actually the storm is getting weaker — less total energy is being released.” Masters writes:
Hurricane Ike is hours away from landfall on the upper Texas coast, and is already generating huge storm surges in Texas and Lousiana. Although still of Category 2 strength, Ike remains larger and more powerful than Category 5 Katrina or Category 5 Rita. As I discussed in yesterday’s blog entry, a good measure of the storm surge potential is Integrated Kinetic Energy (IKE). Ike’s Integrated Kinetic Energy has fallen from 149 Terajoules this morning to 124 at 3:30 pm EDT this afternoon. However, this is still larger than the total energy Katrina had at landfall, and Ike’s storm surge potential rates a 5.1 on a scale of 1 to 6.
Meanwhile, in response to a question from a commenter (”Alan, less total energy, but wouldn’t it be more energy in the area near the eye, which would pass near Galvston and Houston? Also, that could increase the storm surge?”), Sullivan writes:
Brian, the tightening means worse winds in those locations, especially Houston metro. I don’t think it will alter the surge much unless central pressure also falls, which I do not expect. This is a mechanical effect of friction with the coast, not a real strengthening of the storm.





PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
4 Comments
1. Ubu Roi:The only saving grace is that we’re not below sea level. Otherwise, this is looking pretty grim. I wish I had a clue how many did not evacuate from Clear Lake. Really worried for my cousin in Baytown, 77523. Evac information is out of date at Harris County Office of Emergency Management.
There’s some serious “stuck on stupid” going on here, and it’s a collective failure of the public, the media, and the government.
Heard idiot talking heads on TV talking about people trapped on a church roof by the surge in Montgomery County. Try Matagorda, Montgomery is north of Houston. There was some speculation about the storm surge in Dallas, too. There was some speculation that the storm seemed to have “stopped.” They can’t tell a wobble to the west or a contracting eyewall from actual movement?
Don’t trust these idiots doing standups for information, get it from people who have a clue.
Sep 12, 2008 - 5:14 pm 2. Ironman:Linked your posts at another blog
http://thenextright.com/ironman/if-you-thought-energy-was-a-big-issue-this-summer
The impact to the energy markets could be severe and not short lived
Sep 12, 2008 - 5:22 pm 3. Leland:Power starting to go down near me. Less than a mile away, and I’m 35 miles inland (Atascocita). Staying up now looking for Tornados.
In comparing Gustav/Ike to Katrina/Rite, don’t forget we just had Eduardo as well.
Sep 12, 2008 - 5:42 pm 4. Hucbald:One thing to remember with, “worst case scenarios” is that they are all theoretical. One of the doomsday scenarios I learned with FEMA was a cat 5 ditting NO at just the right angle. The problem is, due to the Mississippi river delta, early interaction with land would prevent all but an unprecedented super-storm from maintaining its integrity as a cat 5. Look what Katrina did, and it’s obvious that much less than worst case in the theoretical sense can be worst case in a practical one, or at least close enough to it.
The chances of a real worst case ever happening are so small as to vanish into nothingness, but Ike will be practically indistinguishable from what you’d imagine a worst case being, I think, unfortunately.
This is probably a historic storm, again, unfortunately.
Sep 12, 2008 - 6:21 pm